We develop a novel optimization method for quantization-aware training (QAT). Specifically, we show that convex, piecewise-affine regularization (PAR) can effectively induce neural network weights to cluster towards discrete values. We minimize PAR-regularized loss functions using an aggregate proximal stochastic gradient method (AProx) and prove that it enjoys last-iterate convergence. Our approach provides an interpretation of the straight-through estimator (STE), a widely used heuristic for QAT, as the asymptotic form of PARQ. We conduct experiments to demonstrate that PARQ obtains competitive performance on convolution- and transformer-based vision tasks.

We study the problem of symmetric matrix completion, where the goal is to reconstruct a positive semidefinite matrix $X^\star \in \mathbb{R}^{d\times d}$ of rank-$r$, parameterized by $UU^{\top}$, from only a subset of its observed entries. We show that the vanilla gradient descent (GD) with small initialization provably converges to the ground truth $X^\star$ without requiring any explicit regularization. This convergence result holds true even in the over-parameterized scenario, where the true rank $r$ is unknown and conservatively over-estimated by a search rank $r’\gg r$. The existing results for this problem either require explicit regularization, a sufficiently accurate initial point, or exact knowledge of the true rank $r$. In the over-parameterized regime where $r’\geq r$, we show that, with $\widetilde\Omega(dr^9)$ observations, GD with an initial point $\|U_0\| \leq O(\epsilon)$ converges near-linearly to an $\epsilon$-neighborhood of $X^\star$. Consequently, smaller initial points result in increasingly accurate solutions. Surprisingly, neither the convergence rate nor the final accuracy depends on the over-parameterized search rank $r’$, and they are only governed by the true rank $r$. In the exactly-parameterized regime where $r’=r$, we further enhance this result by proving that GD converges at a faster rate to achieve an arbitrarily small accuracy $\epsilon>0$, provided the initial point satisfies $\|U_0\| = O(1/d)$. At the crux of our method lies a novel weakly-coupled leave-one-out analysis, which allows us to establish the global convergence of GD, extending beyond what was previously possible using the classical leave-one-out analysis.

In this work, we study the performance of sub-gradient method (SubGM) on a natural nonconvex and nonsmooth formulation of low-rank matrix recovery with $\ell_1$-loss, where the goal is to recover a low-rank matrix from a limited number of measurements, a subset of which may be grossly corrupted with noise. We study a scenario where the rank of the true solution is unknown and over-estimated instead. The over-estimation of the rank gives rise to an over-parameterized model in which there are more degrees of freedom than needed. Such over-parameterization may lead to overfitting, or adversely affect the performance of the algorithm. We prove that a simple SubGM with small initialization is agnostic to both over-parameterization and noise in the measurements. In particular, we show that small initialization nullifies the effect of over-parameterization on the performance of SubGM, leading to an exponential improvement in its convergence rate. Moreover, we provide the first unifying framework for analyzing the behavior of SubGM under both outlier and Gaussian noise models, showing that SubGM converges to the true solution, even under arbitrarily large and arbitrarily dense noise values, and, perhaps surprisingly, even if the globally optimal solutions do not correspond to the ground truth. At the core of our results is a robust variant of restricted isometry property, called Sign-RIP, which controls the deviation of the sub-differential of the $\ell_1$-loss from that of an ideal, expected loss. As a byproduct of our results, we consider a subclass of robust low-rank matrix recovery with Gaussian measurements, and show that the number of required samples to guarantee the global convergence of SubGM is independent of the over-parameterized rank.

This work characterizes the effect of depth on the optimization landscape of linear regression, showing that, despite their nonconvexity, deeper models have more desirable optimization landscape. We consider a robust and over-parameterized setting, where a subset of measurements are grossly corrupted with noise, and the true linear model is captured via an $N$-layer diagonal linear neural network. On the negative side, we show that this problem does not have a benign landscape: given any $N\geq 1$, with constant probability, there exists a solution corresponding to the ground truth that is neither local nor global minimum. However, on the positive side, we prove that, for any $N$-layer model with $N\geq 2$, a simple sub-gradient method becomes oblivious to such “problematic” solutions; instead, it converges to a balanced solution that is not only close to the ground truth but also enjoys a flat local landscape, thereby eschewing the need for “early stopping”. Lastly, we empirically verify that the desirable optimization landscape of deeper models extends to other robust learning tasks, including deep matrix recovery and deep ReLU networks with $\ell_1$-loss.