Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arthur Brazinskas

dblp:210/2317 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Language models and text generation · 82% Generative modeling · 13% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 5%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
opinion summarization
1.432021
Learning Opinion Summarizers by Selecting Informative Reviews · EMNLP (1) 2021
Few-Shot Learning for Opinion Summarization · EMNLP (1) 2020
Unsupervised Opinion Summarization as Copycat-Review Generation · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization
0.922021
Learning Opinion Summarizers by Selecting Informative Reviews · EMNLP (1) 2021
Few-Shot Learning for Opinion Summarization · EMNLP (1) 2020
Information retrieval › text summarization
opinion summarization
0.612022
Beyond Opinion Mining: Summarizing Opinions of Customer Reviews · SIGIR 2022
Information retrieval
text summarization
0.612022
Beyond Opinion Mining: Summarizing Opinions of Customer Reviews · SIGIR 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder
0.412020
Unsupervised Opinion Summarization as Copycat-Review Generation · ACL 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
0.112021
Learning Opinion Summarizers by Selecting Informative Reviews · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
conditional language model
0.112020
Few-Shot Learning for Opinion Summarization · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
controllable text generation
0.112020
Unsupervised Opinion Summarization as Copycat-Review Generation · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation
0.112020
Unsupervised Opinion Summarization as Copycat-Review Generation · ACL 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

few-shot learning · 1.0variational inference · 0.6controllable text generation · 0.6auto-encoding · 0.6policy gradient · 0.5amortized variational inference · 0.5pointer-generator · 0.4hierarchical variational autoencoder · 0.4fine-tuning · 0.4conditional transformer language model · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Small Language Models Improve Giants by Rewriting Their Outputs
abstract
Giorgos Vernikos, Arthur Brazinskas, Jakub Adamek, Jonathan Mallinson, Aliaksei Severyn, Eric Malmi. Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Giorgos Vernikos, Arthur Brazinskas, Jakub Adámek, Jonathan Mallinson, Aliaksei Severyn, Eric Malmi
EACL (1)2
2023 Interactive-Chain-Prompting: Ambiguity Resolution for Crosslingual Conditional Generation with Interaction
abstract
Jonathan Pilault, Xavier Garcia, Arthur Bražinskas, Orhan Firat. Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and the 3rd Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2023.
Jonathan Pilault, Xavier Garcia, Arthur Brazinskas, Orhan Firat
IJCNLP (1)3
2022 Beyond Opinion Mining: Summarizing Opinions of Customer Reviews
abstract
Customer reviews are vital for making purchasing decisions in the Information Age. Such reviews can be automatically summarized to provide the user with an overview of opinions. In this tutorial, we present various aspects of opinion summarization that are useful for researchers and practitioners. First, we will introduce the task and major challenges. Then, we will present existing opinion summarization solutions, both pre-neural and neural. We will discuss how summarizers can be trained in the unsupervised, few-shot, and supervised regimes. Each regime has roots in different machine learning methods, such as auto-encoding, controllable text generation, and variational inference. Finally, we will discuss resources and evaluation methods and conclude with the future directions. This three-hour tutorial will provide a comprehensive overview over major advances in opinion summarization. The listeners will be well-equipped with the knowledge that is both useful for research and practical applications.
Reinald Kim Amplayo, Arthur Brazinskas, Yoshi Suhara, Xiaolan Wang 0001, Bing Liu 0001
SIGIR2
2021 Learning Opinion Summarizers by Selecting Informative Reviews
abstract
Opinion summarization has been traditionally approached with unsupervised, weaklysupervised and few-shot learning techniques.In this work, we collect a large dataset of summaries paired with user reviews for over 31,000 products, enabling supervised training.However, the number of reviews per product is large (320 on average), making summarization -and especially training a summarizerimpractical.Moreover, the content of many reviews is not reflected in the human-written summaries, and, thus, the summarizer trained on random review subsets hallucinates.In order to deal with both of these challenges, we formulate the task as jointly learning to select informative subsets of reviews and summarizing the opinions expressed in these subsets.The choice of the review subset is treated as a latent variable, predicted by a small and simple selector.The subset is then fed into a more powerful summarizer.For joint training, we use amortized variational inference and policy gradient methods.Our experiments demonstrate the importance of selecting informative reviews resulting in improved quality of summaries and reduced hallucinations.
Arthur Brazinskas, Mirella Lapata, Ivan Titov 0001
EMNLP (1)1
2020 Unsupervised Opinion Summarization as Copycat-Review Generation
abstract
Opinion summarization is the task of automatically creating summaries that reflect subjective information expressed in multiple documents, such as product reviews.While the majority of previous work has focused on the extractive setting, i.e., selecting fragments from input reviews to produce a summary, we let the model generate novel sentences and hence produce abstractive summaries.Recent progress in summarization has seen the development of supervised models which rely on large quantities of document-summary pairs.Since such training data is expensive to acquire, we instead consider the unsupervised setting, in other words, we do not use any summaries in training.We define a generative model for a review collection which capitalizes on the intuition that when generating a new review given a set of other reviews of a product, we should be able to control the "amount of novelty" going into the new review or, equivalently, vary the extent to which it deviates from the input.At test time, when generating summaries, we force the novelty to be minimal, and produce a text reflecting consensus opinions.We capture this intuition by defining a hierarchical variational autoencoder model.Both individual reviews and the products they correspond to are associated with stochastic latent codes, and the review generator ("decoder") has direct access to the text of input reviews through the pointergenerator mechanism.Experiments on Amazon and Yelp datasets, show that setting at test time the review's latent code to its mean, allows the model to produce fluent and coherent summaries reflecting common opinions.
Arthur Brazinskas, Mirella Lapata, Ivan Titov 0001
ACL1
2020 Few-Shot Learning for Opinion Summarization
abstract
Opinion summarization is the automatic creation of text reflecting subjective information expressed in multiple documents, such as user reviews of a product.The task is practically important and has attracted a lot of attention.However, due to the high cost of summary production, datasets large enough for training supervised models are lacking.Instead, the task has been traditionally approached with extractive methods that learn to select text fragments in an unsupervised or weakly-supervised way.Recently, it has been shown that abstractive summaries, potentially more fluent and better at reflecting conflicting information, can also be produced in an unsupervised fashion.However, these models, not being exposed to actual summaries, fail to capture their essential properties.In this work, we show that even a handful of summaries is sufficient to bootstrap generation of the summary text with all expected properties, such as writing style, informativeness, fluency, and sentiment preservation.We start by training a conditional Transformer language model to generate a new product review given other available reviews of the product.The model is also conditioned on review properties that are directly related to summaries; the properties are derived from reviews with no manual effort.In the second stage, we fine-tune a plug-in module that learns to predict property values on a handful of summaries.This lets us switch the generator to the summarization mode.We show on Amazon and Yelp datasets that our approach substantially outperforms previous extractive and abstractive methods in automatic and human evaluation.
Arthur Brazinskas, Mirella Lapata, Ivan Titov 0001
EMNLP (1)1
2018 Embedding Words as Distributions with a Bayesian Skip-gram Model
abstract
We introduce a method for embedding words as probability densities in a low-dimensional space. Rather than assuming that a word embedding is fixed across the entire text collection, as in standard word embedding methods, in our Bayesian model we generate it from a word-specific prior density for each occurrence of a given word. Intuitively, for each word, the prior density encodes the distribution of its potential ‘meanings’. These prior densities are conceptually similar to Gaussian embeddings of ėwcitevilnis2014word. Interestingly, unlike the Gaussian embeddings, we can also obtain context-specific densities: they encode uncertainty about the sense of a word given its context and correspond to the approximate posterior distributions within our model. The context-dependent densities have many potential applications: for example, we show that they can be directly used in the lexical substitution task. We describe an effective estimation method based on the variational autoencoding framework. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our embedding technique on a range of standard benchmarks.
Arthur Brazinskas, Serhii Havrylov, Ivan Titov 0001
COLING1