Ensuring the long-term reproducibility of data analyses requires results stability tests to verify that analysis results remain within acceptable variation bounds despite inevitable software updates and hardware evolutions. This paper introduces a numerical variability approach for results stability tests, which determines acceptable variation bounds using random rounding of floating-point calculations. By applying the resulting stability test tofMRIPrep, a widely-used neuroimaging tool, we show that the test is sensitive enough to detect subtle updates in image processing methods while remaining specific enough to accept numerical variations within a reference version of the application. This result contributes to enhancing the reliability and reproducibility of data analyses by providing a robust and flexible method for stability testing.

Numerical stability is a crucial requirement of reliable scientific computing. However, despite the pervasiveness of Python in data science, analyzing large Python programs remains challenging due to the lack of scalable numerical analysis tools available for this language. To fill this gap, we developed PyTracer, a profiler to quantify numerical instability in Python applications. PyTracertransparently instruments Python code to produce numerical traces and visualize them interactively in a Plotly dashboard. We designed PyTracerto be agnostic to numerical noise model, allowing for numerical profiling through Monte-Carlo Arithmetic, random rounding, random data perturbation, or structured noise for a particular application. We illustrate PyTracer's capabilities by testing the numerical stability of key functions in both SciPy and Scikit-learn, two dominant Python libraries for mathematical modeling. Through these evaluations, we demonstrate PyTraceras a scalable, automated, and generic framework for numerical profiling in Python.

Mondrian Forests are a powerful data stream classification method, but their large memory footprint makes them ill-suited for low-resource platforms such as connected objects. We explored using reduced-precision floating-point representations to lower memory consumption and evaluated its effect on classification performance. We applied the Mondrian Forest implementation provided by OrpailleCC, a C++ collection of data stream algorithms, to two canonical datasets in human activity recognition: Recofit and Banos et al. Results show that the precision of floating-point values used by tree nodes can be reduced from 64 bits to 8 bits with no significant difference in F1 score. In some cases, reduced precision was shown to improve classification performance, presumably due to its regularization effect. We conclude that numerical precision is a relevant hyperparameter in the Mondrian Forest, and that commonly-used double precision values may not be necessary for optimal performance. Future work will evaluate the generalizability of these findings to other data stream classifiers.

Replicability, the ability to replicate scientific findings, is a prerequisite for scientific discovery and clinical utility. Troublingly, we are in the midst of a replicability crisis. A key to replicability is that multiple measurements of the same item (e.g., experimental sample or clinical participant) under fixed experimental constraints are relatively similar to one another. Thus, statistics that quantify the relative contributions of accidental deviations-such as measurement error-as compared to systematic deviations-such as individual differences-are critical. We demonstrate that existing replicability statistics, such as intra-class correlation coefficient and fingerprinting, fail to adequately differentiate between accidental and systematic deviations in very simple settings. We therefore propose a novel statistic, discriminability, which quantifies the degree to which an individual's samples are relatively similar to one another, without restricting the data to be univariate, Gaussian, or even Euclidean. Using this statistic, we introduce the possibility of optimizing experimental design via increasing discriminability and prove that optimizing discriminability improves performance bounds in subsequent inference tasks. In extensive simulated and real datasets (focusing on brain imaging and demonstrating on genomics), only optimizing data discriminability improves performance on all subsequent inference tasks for each dataset. We therefore suggest that designing experiments and analyses to optimize discriminability may be a crucial step in solving the replicability crisis, and more generally, mitigating accidental measurement error.

The rate of progress in human neurosciences is limited by the inability to easily apply a wide range of analysis methods to the plethora of different datasets acquired in labs around the world. In this work, we introduce a framework for creating, testing, versioning and archiving portable applications for analyzing neuroimaging data organized and described in compliance with the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS). The portability of these applications (BIDS Apps) is achieved by using container technologies that encapsulate all binary and other dependencies in one convenient package. BIDS Apps run on all three major operating systems with no need for complex setup and configuration and thanks to the comprehensiveness of the BIDS standard they require little manual user input. Previous containerized data processing solutions were limited to single user environments and not compatible with most multi-tenant High Performance Computing systems. BIDS Apps overcome this limitation by taking advantage of the Singularity container technology. As a proof of concept, this work is accompanied by 22 ready to use BIDS Apps, packaging a diverse set of commonly used neuroimaging algorithms.