Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Richard Kurle
dblp:210/2562
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 39% Language models and text generation · 13% Generative modeling · 12% |
Topics — the 22 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
1.3 | 3 | 2021 | Latent Matters: Learning Deep State-Space Models · NeurIPS 2021 Learning Hierarchical Priors in VAEs · NeurIPS 2019 Multi-Source Neural Variational Inference · AAAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | On the detrimental effect of invariances in the likelihood for variational inference · NeurIPS 2022 Continual Learning with Bayesian Neural Networks for Non-Stationary Data · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian filtering
kalman filtering |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Latent Matters: Learning Deep State-Space Models · NeurIPS 2021 Normalizing Kalman Filters for Multivariate Time Series Analysis · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | xLSTM 7B: A Recurrent LLM for Fast and Efficient Inference · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | xLSTM 7B: A Recurrent LLM for Fast and Efficient Inference · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › neural language model
recurrent neural network language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | xLSTM 7B: A Recurrent LLM for Fast and Efficient Inference · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
state space model |
0.9 | 2 | 2020 | Deep Rao-Blackwellised Particle Filters for Time Series Forecasting · NeurIPS 2020 Normalizing Kalman Filters for Multivariate Time Series Analysis · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.8 | 3 | 2022 | On the detrimental effect of invariances in the likelihood for variational inference · NeurIPS 2022 Deep Explicit Duration Switching Models for Time Series · NeurIPS 2021 Multi-Source Neural Variational Inference · AAAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
approximate bayesian inference |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | On the detrimental effect of invariances in the likelihood for variational inference · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
mean-field approximation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | On the detrimental effect of invariances in the likelihood for variational inference · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis
bayesian filtering and smoothing |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Latent Matters: Learning Deep State-Space Models · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
deep state space model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Latent Matters: Learning Deep State-Space Models · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › dynamical system
switching state-space model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Deep Explicit Duration Switching Models for Time Series · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
time series modeling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Deep Explicit Duration Switching Models for Time Series · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Continual Learning with Bayesian Neural Networks for Non-Stationary Data · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Normalizing Kalman Filters for Multivariate Time Series Analysis · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › sequential monte carlo
particle filtering |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Deep Rao-Blackwellised Particle Filters for Time Series Forecasting · NeurIPS 2020 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › SLAM
rao-blackwellized particle filter |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Deep Rao-Blackwellised Particle Filters for Time Series Forecasting · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › prior modeling
hierarchical prior |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning Hierarchical Priors in VAEs · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
latent representation learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning Hierarchical Priors in VAEs · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
invariance |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | On the detrimental effect of invariances in the likelihood for variational inference · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis
time series forecasting |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Normalizing Kalman Filters for Multivariate Time Series Analysis · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
constrained optimization · 0.9xLSTM architecture · 0.9invariance gap analysis · 0.6evidence lower bound analysis · 0.6recurrent neural network · 0.5monte carlo inference · 0.5amortised variational inference · 0.5variational inference · 0.4normalizing flow · 0.4auxiliary variable approach · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | xLSTM 7B: A Recurrent LLM for Fast and Efficient InferenceabstractRecent breakthroughs in solving reasoning, math and coding problems with Large Language Models (LLMs) have been enabled by investing substantial computation budgets at inference time. Therefore, inference speed is one of the most critical properties of LLM architectures, and there is a growing need for LLMs that are efficient and fast at inference. Recently, LLMs built on the xLSTM architecture have emerged as a powerful alternative to Transformers, offering linear compute scaling with sequence length and constant memory usage, both highly desirable properties for efficient inference. However, such xLSTM-based LLMs have yet to be scaled to larger models and assessed and compared with respect to inference speed and efficiency. In this work, we introduce xLSTM 7B, a 7-billion-parameter LLM that combines xLSTM’s architectural benefits with targeted optimizations for fast and efficient inference. Our experiments demonstrate that xLSTM 7B achieves performance on downstream tasks comparable to other similar-sized LLMs, while providing significantly faster inference speeds and greater efficiency compared to Llama- and Mamba-based LLMs. These results establish xLSTM 7B as the fastest and most efficient 7B LLM, offering a solution for tasks that require large amounts of test-time computation. Our work highlights xLSTM’s potential as a foundational architecture for methods building on heavy use of LLM inference. Our model weights, model code and training code are open-source. Model: https://huggingface.co/NX-AI/xLSTM-7b Code: https://github.com/NX-AI/xlstm and https://github.com/NX-AI/xlstm-jax. Maximilian Beck, Korbinian Pöppel, Phillip Lippe, Richard Kurle, Patrick M. Blies, Günter Klambauer, Sebastian Böck, Sepp Hochreiter |
ICML | 4 |
| 2022 | On the detrimental effect of invariances in the likelihood for variational inferenceabstractVariational Bayesian posterior inference often requires simplifying approximations such as mean-field parametrisation to ensure tractability. However, prior work has associated the variational mean-field approximation for Bayesian neural networks with underfitting in the case of small datasets or large model sizes. In this work, we show that invariances in the likelihood function of over-parametrised models contribute to this phenomenon because these invariances complicate the structure of the posterior by introducing discrete and/or continuous modes which cannot be well approximated by Gaussian mean-field distributions. In particular, we show that the mean-field approximation has an additional gap in the evidence lower bound compared to a purpose-built posterior that takes into account the known invariances. Importantly, this invariance gap is not constant; it vanishes as the approximation reverts to the prior. We proceed by first considering translation invariances in a linear model with a single data point in detail. We show that, while the true posterior can be constructed from a mean-field parametrisation, this is achieved only if the objective function takes into account the invariance gap. Then, we transfer our analysis of the linear model to neural networks. Our analysis provides a framework for future work to explore solutions to the invariance problem. Richard Kurle, Ralf Herbrich, Tim Januschowski, Yuyang Wang 0001, Jan Gasthaus |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | Deep Explicit Duration Switching Models for Time SeriesabstractMany complex time series can be effectively subdivided into distinct regimes that exhibit persistent dynamics. Discovering the switching behavior and the statistical patterns in these regimes is important for understanding the underlying dynamical system. We propose the Recurrent Explicit Duration Switching Dynamical System (RED-SDS), a flexible model that is capable of identifying both state- and time-dependent switching dynamics. State-dependent switching is enabled by a recurrent state-to-switch connection and an explicit duration count variable is used to improve the time-dependent switching behavior. We demonstrate how to perform efficient inference using a hybrid algorithm that approximates the posterior of the continuous states via an inference network and performs exact inference for the discrete switches and counts. The model is trained by maximizing a Monte Carlo lower bound of the marginal log-likelihood that can be computed efficiently as a byproduct of the inference routine. Empirical results on multiple datasets demonstrate that RED-SDS achieves considerable improvement in time series segmentation and competitive forecasting performance against the state of the art. Abdul Fatir Ansari, Konstantinos Benidis, Richard Kurle, Ali Caner Türkmen, Harold Soh, Alexander J. Smola, Yuyang Wang 0001, Tim Januschowski |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2021 | Latent Matters: Learning Deep State-Space ModelsabstractDeep state-space models (DSSMs) enable temporal predictions by learning the underlying dynamics of observed sequence data. They are often trained by maximising the evidence lower bound. However, as we show, this does not ensure the model actually learns the underlying dynamics. We therefore propose a constrained optimisation framework as a general approach for training DSSMs. Building upon this, we introduce the extended Kalman VAE (EKVAE), which combines amortised variational inference with classic Bayesian filtering/smoothing to model dynamics more accurately than RNN-based DSSMs. Our results show that the constrained optimisation framework significantly improves system identification and prediction accuracy on the example of established state-of-the-art DSSMs. The EKVAE outperforms previous models w.r.t. prediction accuracy, achieves remarkable results in identifying dynamical systems, and can furthermore successfully learn state-space representations where static and dynamic features are disentangled. Alexej Klushyn, Richard Kurle, Maximilian Soelch 0001, Botond Cseke, Patrick van der Smagt |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2020 | Continual Learning with Bayesian Neural Networks for Non-Stationary Data
Richard Kurle, Botond Cseke, Alexej Klushyn, Patrick van der Smagt, Stephan Günnemann |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2020 | Normalizing Kalman Filters for Multivariate Time Series AnalysisabstractThis paper tackles the modelling of large, complex and multivariate time series panels in a probabilistic setting. To this extent, we present a novel approach reconciling classical state space models with deep learning methods. By augmenting state space models with normalizing flows, we mitigate imprecisions stemming from idealized assumptions in state space models. The resulting model is highly flexible while still retaining many of the attractive properties of state space models, e.g., uncertainty and observation errors are properly accounted for, inference is tractable, sampling is efficient, good generalization performance is observed, even in low data regimes. We demonstrate competitiveness against state-of-the-art deep learning methods on the tasks of forecasting real world data and handling varying levels of missing data. Emmanuel de Bézenac, Syama Sundar Rangapuram, Konstantinos Benidis, Michael Bohlke-Schneider, Richard Kurle, Lorenzo Stella, Hilaf Hasson, Patrick Gallinari, Tim Januschowski |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2020 | Deep Rao-Blackwellised Particle Filters for Time Series ForecastingabstractThis work addresses efficient inference and learning in switching Gaussian linear dynamical systems using a Rao-Blackwellised particle filter and a corresponding Monte Carlo objective. To improve the forecasting capabilities, we extend this classical model by conditionally linear state-to-switch dynamics, while leaving the partial tractability of the conditional Gaussian linear part intact. Furthermore, we use an auxiliary variable approach with a decoder-type neural network that allows for more complex non-linear emission models and multivariate observations. We propose a Monte Carlo objective that leverages the conditional linearity by computing the corresponding conditional expectations in closed-form and a suitable proposal distribution that is factorised similarly to the optimal proposal distribution. We evaluate our approach on several popular time series forecasting datasets as well as image streams of simulated physical systems. Our results show improved forecasting performance compared to other deep state-space model approaches. Richard Kurle, Syama Sundar Rangapuram, Emmanuel de Bézenac, Stephan Günnemann, Jan Gasthaus |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | Multi-Source Neural Variational InferenceabstractLearning from multiple sources of information is an important problem in machine-learning research. The key challenges are learning representations and formulating inference methods that take into account the complementarity and redundancy of various information sources. In this paper we formulate a variational autoencoder based multi-source learning framework in which each encoder is conditioned on a different information source. This allows us to relate the sources via the shared latent variables by computing divergence measures between individual source’s posterior approximations. We explore a variety of options to learn these encoders and to integrate the beliefs they compute into a consistent posterior approximation. We visualise learned beliefs on a toy dataset and evaluate our methods for learning shared representations and structured output prediction, showing trade-offs of learning separate encoders for each information source. Furthermore, we demonstrate how conflict detection and redundancy can increase robustness of inference in a multi-source setting. Richard Kurle, Stephan Günnemann, Patrick van der Smagt |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2019 | Learning Hierarchical Priors in VAEsabstractWe propose to learn a hierarchical prior in the context of variational autoencoders to avoid the over-regularisation resulting from a standard normal prior distribution. To incentivise an informative latent representation of the data, we formulate the learning problem as a constrained optimisation problem by extending the Taming VAEs framework to two-level hierarchical models. We introduce a graph-based interpolation method, which shows that the topology of the learned latent representation corresponds to the topology of the data manifold---and present several examples, where desired properties of latent representation such as smoothness and simple explanatory factors are learned by the prior. Alexej Klushyn, Nutan Chen, Richard Kurle, Botond Cseke, Patrick van der Smagt |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2018 | Metrics for Deep Generative ModelsabstractNeural samplers such as variational autoencoders (VAEs) or generative adversarial networks (GANs) approximate distributions by transforming samples from a simple random source—the latent space—to samples from a more complex distribution represented by a dataset. While the manifold hypothesis implies that a dataset contains large regions of low density, the training criterions of VAEs and GANs will make the latent space densely covered. Consequently points that are separated by low-density regions in observation space will be pushed together in latent space, making stationary distances poor proxies for similarity. We transfer ideas from Riemannian geometry to this setting, letting the distance between two points be the shortest path on a Riemannian manifold induced by the transformation. The method yields a principled distance measure, provides a tool for visual inspection of deep generative models, and an alternative to linear interpolation in latent space. In addition, it can be applied for robot movement generalization using previously learned skills. The method is evaluated on a synthetic dataset with known ground truth; on a simulated robot arm dataset; on human motion capture data; and on a generative model of handwritten digits. Nutan Chen, Alexej Klushyn, Richard Kurle, Xueyan Jiang, Justin Bayer, Patrick van der Smagt |
AISTATS | 3 |