EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Isaac Dykeman
dblp:210/5424
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 75% Multimedia systems and quality of experience · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Visualization and visual analytics
interaction design |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Applying Pragmatics Principles for Interaction with Visual Analytics · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2018 |
Multimedia systems and quality of experience › user interaction
interaction techniques and input |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Applying Pragmatics Principles for Interaction with Visual Analytics · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2018 |
Visualization and visual analytics › interaction techniques
natural language interface |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Applying Pragmatics Principles for Interaction with Visual Analytics · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2018 |
Visualization and visual analytics
usability and user experience research |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Applying Pragmatics Principles for Interaction with Visual Analytics · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pragmatics principles · 0.3natural language processing · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Applying Pragmatics Principles for Interaction with Visual AnalyticsabstractInteractive visual data analysis is most productive when users can focus on answering the questions they have about their data, rather than focusing on how to operate the interface to the analysis tool. One viable approach to engaging users in interactive conversations with their data is a natural language interface to visualizations. These interfaces have the potential to be both more expressive and more accessible than other interaction paradigms. We explore how principles from language pragmatics can be applied to the flow of visual analytical conversations, using natural language as an input modality. We evaluate the effectiveness of pragmatics support in our system Evizeon, and present design considerations for conversation interfaces to visual analytics tools. Enamul Hoque Prince, Vidya Setlur, Melanie Tory, Isaac Dykeman |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 4 |