Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Isaac Dykeman

dblp:210/5424 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 75% Multimedia systems and quality of experience · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics
interaction design
0.312018
Applying Pragmatics Principles for Interaction with Visual Analytics · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2018
Multimedia systems and quality of experience › user interaction
interaction techniques and input
0.312018
Applying Pragmatics Principles for Interaction with Visual Analytics · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2018
Visualization and visual analytics › interaction techniques
natural language interface
0.312018
Applying Pragmatics Principles for Interaction with Visual Analytics · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2018
Visualization and visual analytics
usability and user experience research
0.312018
Applying Pragmatics Principles for Interaction with Visual Analytics · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pragmatics principles · 0.3natural language processing · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Applying Pragmatics Principles for Interaction with Visual Analytics
abstract
Interactive visual data analysis is most productive when users can focus on answering the questions they have about their data, rather than focusing on how to operate the interface to the analysis tool. One viable approach to engaging users in interactive conversations with their data is a natural language interface to visualizations. These interfaces have the potential to be both more expressive and more accessible than other interaction paradigms. We explore how principles from language pragmatics can be applied to the flow of visual analytical conversations, using natural language as an input modality. We evaluate the effectiveness of pragmatics support in our system Evizeon, and present design considerations for conversation interfaces to visual analytics tools.
Enamul Hoque Prince, Vidya Setlur, Melanie Tory, Isaac Dykeman
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.4