Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander Buyval

dblp:210/9830 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Autonomous driving · 44% Robot navigation and mapping · 44% Efficient and distributed learning · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception
0.312018
Realtime Vehicle and Pedestrian Tracking for Didi Udacity Self-Driving Car Challenge · ICRA 2018
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
sensor fusion
0.312018
Realtime Vehicle and Pedestrian Tracking for Didi Udacity Self-Driving Car Challenge · ICRA 2018
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › hardware acceleration
GPU acceleration
0.112018
Realtime Vehicle and Pedestrian Tracking for Didi Udacity Self-Driving Car Challenge · ICRA 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sensor fusion · 0.3image processing · 0.3GPU computing · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 The Architecture of the Self-Driving Car Project at Innopolis University
abstract
This paper describes the software and hardware platform used by the Innopolis University team to conduct investigations in the field of self-driving vehicles. The paper also describes basic technical solutions and the grounds for decisions for each key subsystems: localization, route planning, control, object perception and prediction of their behavior. The developed software and hardware platform was implemented for KAMAZ truck and KIA electric car navigation in various navigation scenarios. The article presents the results of testing of the platform for both of those vehicles.
Alexander Buyval, Aidar Gabdullin, Salimzhan Gafurov, Roman Fedorenko, Maxim Lyubimov
DeSE1
2018 Model Predictive Path Integral Control for Car Driving with Dynamic Cost Map
Alexander Buyval, Aidar Gabdullin, Alexandr Klimchik
ICINCO (1)1
2018 Road sign detection and localization based on camera and lidar data
abstract
This paper presents a method for classification and localization of road signs in a 3D space, which is done with a help of neural network and point cloud obtained from a laser range finder (LIDAR). In addition, to accomplish this task and train the neural network (which is based on Faster-RCNN architecture) a dataset was collected. The trained convolutional network is used as a part of ROS node which fuses the obtained classification, data from the camera and lidar measurements. The output of the system is a set of images with bounding boxes and point clouds, corresponding to real signs on the road. The introduced method was tested and performed well on a dataset acquired from a self-driving car during different road conditions.
Alexander Buyval, Aidar Gabdullin, Maxim Lyubimov
ICMV1
2018 Realtime Vehicle and Pedestrian Tracking for Didi Udacity Self-Driving Car Challenge
abstract
The efficiency and execution time of a road scene evaluation subsystem directly influences a self-driving car's control effectiveness. This article presents a novel approach to fuse data from various sensors (camera, LIDAR, radar, IMU) for pedestrian and vehicle tracking. Our approach, thanks to modern methods of image processing and power of GPU for LIDAR processing, achieves 25Hz update frequency for tracking. The system has been tested on the DiDi-Udacity Self-Driving Challenge datasets.
Alexander Buyval, Aidar Gabdullin, Ruslan Mustafin, Ilya Shimchik
ICRA1
2017 Deriving overtaking strategy from nonlinear model predictive control for a race car
abstract
Car racing control is often assumed to take place in isolation, although the greatest strategic challenges arise in the presence of other cars. Our solution uses a combined nonlinear system model which includes the four-wheeled vehicle dynamics model and point-mass model of its opponent car. This proposed combined model allows the optimal control scheme to automatically find an overtaking strategy. The FORCES code generation tool to handle the consequent computational complexity of the Nonlinear Model Predictive Controller (NMPC). We demonstrate the practicality of the suggested method by performing real-time control in a racing simulation software.
Alexander Buyval, Aidar Gabdullin, Ruslan Mustafin, Ilya Shimchik
IROS1
2016 Comparative analysis of ROS-based monocular SLAM methods for indoor navigation
abstract
This paper presents a comparison of four most recent ROS-based monocular SLAM-related methods: ORB-SLAM, REMODE, LSD-SLAM, and DPPTAM, and analyzes their feasibility for a mobile robot application in indoor environment. We tested these methods using video data that was recorded from a conventional wide-angle full HD webcam with a rolling shutter. The camera was mounted on a human-operated prototype of an unmanned ground vehicle, which followed a closed-loop trajectory. Both feature-based methods (ORB-SLAM, REMODE) and direct SLAMrelated algorithms (LSD-SLAM, DPPTAM) demonstrated reasonably good results in detection of volumetric objects, corners, obstacles and other local features. However, we met difficulties with recovering typical for offices homogeneously colored walls, since all of these methods created empty spaces in a reconstructed sparse 3D scene. This may cause collisions of an autonomously guided robot with unfeatured walls and thus limits applicability of maps, which are obtained by the considered monocular SLAM-related methods for indoor robot navigation.
Alexander Buyval, Ilya Afanasyev 0001, Evgeni Magid
ICMV1