Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Simkin

dblp:211/1007 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 44% Computational complexity · 16% Information theory · 16%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational complexity › counting problems
approximate counting and sampling
0.812024
Sampling, Counting, and Large Deviations for Triangle-Free Graphs Near the Critical Density · FOCS 2024
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › statistical physics models
hard-core model
0.812024
Sampling, Counting, and Large Deviations for Triangle-Free Graphs Near the Critical Density · FOCS 2024
Information theory › probability theory
large deviations
0.812024
Sampling, Counting, and Large Deviations for Triangle-Free Graphs Near the Critical Density · FOCS 2024
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics
probabilistic combinatorics
0.812024
Sampling, Counting, and Large Deviations for Triangle-Free Graphs Near the Critical Density · FOCS 2024
Algorithms and data structures
randomized algorithms
0.612022
A Lower Bound for the n-queens Problem · SODA 2022
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms
randomized greedy algorithm
0.612022
A Lower Bound for the n-queens Problem · SODA 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hypergraph hard-core model · 0.8approximate sampling · 0.8approximate counting · 0.8random greedy algorithm · 0.6absorbing method · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Sampling, Counting, and Large Deviations for Triangle-Free Graphs Near the Critical Density
abstract
We study the following combinatorial counting and sampling problems: can we sample from the Erdős-Rényi random graph$G(n,p)$conditioned on triangle-freeness? Can we approximate (either algorithmically or with a formula) the probability that$G(n,p)$is triangle-free? These are prototypical instances of forbidden substructure problems ubiquitous in combinatorics. The algorithmic questions are instances of approximate sampling and counting for a hypergraph hard-core model. Estimating the probability that$G(n,p)$has no triangles is a fundamental question in probabilistic combinatorics and one that has led to the development of many important tools in the field. Through the work of several authors, the asymnpotics of the logarithm of this probability are known if$p=o(n^{-1/2})$or if$p=\omega(n^{-1/2})$. The regime$p=\Theta(n^{-1/2})$is more mysterious, as this range witnesses a dramatic change in the the typical structural properties of$G(n,p)$conditioned on triangle-freeness. As we show, this change in structure has a profound impact on the performance of sampling algorithms. We give two different efficient sampling algorithms for this problem (and complementary approximate counting algorithms), one that is efficient when$p < c/\sqrt{n}$and one that is efficient when$p > C/\sqrt{n}$for constants$c, C > 0$. The latter algorithm involves a new approach for dealing with large defects in the setting of sampling from low-temperature spin models. Our algorithmic results can be used to give an asymptotic formula for the logarithm of the probability$G(n,p)$is triangle-free when$p < c/\sqrt{n}$. This algorithmic approach to large deviation problems in random graphs is very different than the known approaches in the suBCRitical regime$p=o(n^{-1/2})$(based on the Poisson paradigm) and in the supercritical regime$p=\omega(n^{-1/2})$(based on regularity lemmas or hypergraph containers); in fact, to the best of our knowledge, no asymptotic formula for the log probability in the regime$p=\Theta(n^{-1/2})$was even conjectured previously.
Matthew Jenssen, Will Perkins 0001, Aditya Potukuchi, Michael Simkin
FOCS4
2022 A Lower Bound for the n-queens Problem
abstract
The n-queens puzzle is to place n mutually non-attacking queens on an n × n chessboard. We present a simple two stage randomized algorithm to construct such configurations. In the first stage, a random greedy algorithm constructs an approximate toroidal n-queens configuration. In this well-known variant the diagonals wrap around the board from left to right and from top to bottom. We show that with high probability this algorithm succeeds in placing (1–o(1))n queens on the board. In the second stage, the method of absorbers is used to obtain a complete solution to the non-toroidal problem. By counting the number of choices available at each step of the random greedy algorithm we conclude that there are more than ((1–o(1)) ne–3)n solutions to the n-queens problem. This proves a conjecture of Rivin, Vardi, and Zimmerman in a strong form. Recently, using different methods, Bowtell and Keevash proved the same lower bound for the toroidal problem, giving an independent proof of the result.
Michael Simkin, Zur Luria
SODA1