Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chengsong Huang
dblp:211/1188
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0009-1812-4515ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 6 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 23% Representation and self-supervised learning · 20% Graph learning · 16% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
confidence calibration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Taming Overconfidence in LLMs: Reward Calibration in RLHF · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph foundation model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GOFA: A Generative One-For-All Model for Joint Graph Language Modeling · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph foundation model
graph language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GOFA: A Generative One-For-All Model for Joint Graph Language Modeling · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Taming Overconfidence in LLMs: Reward Calibration in RLHF · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward design
reward calibration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Taming Overconfidence in LLMs: Reward Calibration in RLHF · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
self-supervised representation learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GOFA: A Generative One-For-All Model for Joint Graph Language Modeling · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
document understanding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | TableVLM: Multi-modal Pre-training for Table Structure Recognition · ACL (1) 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning › agent planning
embodied planning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On Grounded Planning for Embodied Tasks with Language Models · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning › masked modeling
masked visual-language modeling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | TableVLM: Multi-modal Pre-training for Table Structure Recognition · ACL (1) 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training
multimodal pretraining |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | TableVLM: Multi-modal Pre-training for Table Structure Recognition · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › document understanding › table recognition
table structure recognition |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | TableVLM: Multi-modal Pre-training for Table Structure Recognition · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
distant supervision |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Revisiting the Negative Data of Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Revisiting the Negative Data of Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | On Grounded Planning for Embodied Tasks with Language Models · AAAI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reward modeling · 0.9proximal policy optimization · 0.9next-word prediction · 0.9instruction fine-tuning · 0.9graph neural network · 0.9transformer encoder-decoder · 0.7table encoding · 0.7masked visual-language modeling · 0.7iterative decoding · 0.7negative data sampling · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | GOFA: A Generative One-For-All Model for Joint Graph Language ModelingabstractFoundation models, such as Large Language Models (LLMs) or Large Vision Models (LVMs), have emerged as one of the most powerful tools in the respective fields. However, unlike text and image data, graph data do not have a definitive structure, posing great challenges to developing a Graph Foundation Model (GFM). For example, current attempts at designing general graph models either transform graph data into a language format for LLM-based prediction or still train a GNN model with LLM as an assistant. The former can handle unlimited tasks, while the latter captures graph structure much better---yet, no existing work can achieve both simultaneously. In this paper, we first identify three key desirable properties of a GFM: self-supervised pretraining, fluidity in tasks, and graph awareness. To account for these properties, we extend the conventional language modeling to the graph domain and propose a novel generative graph language model GOFA. The model interleaves randomly initialized GNN layers into a frozen pre-trained LLM so that the semantic and structural modeling abilities are organically combined. GOFA is pre-trained on newly proposed graph-level next-word prediction, question-answering, structural understanding, and information retrieval tasks to obtain the above GFM properties. The pre-trained model is further instruction fine-tuned to obtain the task-solving ability. Our GOFA model is evaluated on various downstream datasets unseen during the pre-training and fine-tuning phases, demonstrating a strong ability to solve structural and contextual problems in zero-shot scenarios. The code is available at https://github.com/JiaruiFeng/GOFA. Lecheng Kong, Jiarui Feng, Hao Liu 0057, Chengsong Huang, Jiaxin Huang 0001, Muhan Zhang |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2025 | Taming Overconfidence in LLMs: Reward Calibration in RLHFabstractLanguage model calibration refers to the alignment between the confidence of the model and the actual performance of its responses.
While previous studies point out the overconfidence phenomenon in Large Language Models (LLMs) and show that LLMs trained with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) are overconfident with a more sharpened output probability, in this study, we reveal that RLHF tends to lead models to express verbalized overconfidence in their own responses. We investigate the underlying cause of this overconfidence and demonstrate that reward models used for Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) exhibit inherent biases towards high-confidence scores regardless of the actual quality of responses. Building upon this insight, we propose two PPO variants: PPO-M: $\underline{PPO}$ with Calibrated Reward $\underline{M}$odeling and PPO-C: $\underline{PPO}$ with Calibrated Reward $\underline{C}$alculation. PPO-M integrates explicit confidence scores in reward model training, which calibrates reward models
to better capture the alignment between response quality and verbalized confidence. PPO-C adjusts the reward score during PPO based on the difference between the current reward and the moving average of past rewards. Both PPO-M and PPO-C can be seamlessly integrated into the current PPO pipeline and do not require additional golden labels. We evaluate our methods on both $\texttt{Llama3-8B}$ and $\texttt{Mistral-7B}$ across six diverse datasets including multiple-choice and open-ended generation. Experiment results demonstrate that both of our methods can reduce calibration error and maintain performance comparable to standard PPO. We further show that they do not compromise model capabilities in open-ended conversation settings. Jixuan Leng, Chengsong Huang, Banghua Zhu, Jiaxin Huang 0001 |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2023 | On Grounded Planning for Embodied Tasks with Language ModelsabstractLanguage models (LMs) have demonstrated their capability in possessing commonsense knowledge of the physical world, a crucial aspect of performing tasks in everyday life. However, it remains unclear whether they have the capacity to generate grounded, executable plans for embodied tasks. This is a challenging task as LMs lack the ability to perceive the environment through vision and feedback from the physical environment. In this paper, we address this important research question and present the first investigation into the topic. Our novel problem formulation, named G-PlanET, inputs a high-level goal and a data table about objects in a specific environment, and then outputs a step-by-step actionable plan for a robotic agent to follow. To facilitate the study, we establish an evaluation protocol and design a dedicated metric, KAS, to assess the quality of the plans. Our experiments demonstrate that the use of tables for encoding the environment and an iterative decoding strategy can significantly enhance the LMs' ability in grounded planning. Our analysis also reveals interesting and non-trivial findings. Bill Y. Lin, Chengsong Huang, Qian Liu 0033, Wenda Gu, Sam Sommerer, Xiang Ren 0001 |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2023 | TableVLM: Multi-modal Pre-training for Table Structure RecognitionabstractTables are widely used in research and business, and are suitable for human consumption, but not easily machine-processable, particularly when tables are present in images.One of the main challenges to extracting data from images of tables is to accurately recognize table structures, especially for complex tables with cross rows and columns.In this study, we propose a novel multi-modal pre-training model for table structure recognition, named TableVLM.With a two-stream multi-modal transformer-based encoder-decoder architecture, TableVLM learns to capture rich table structure-related features by multiple carefullydesigned unsupervised objectives inspired by the notion of masked visual-language modeling.To pre-train this model, we also created a dataset, called ComplexTable, which consists of 1, 000K samples to be released publicly.Experiment results show that the model built on pre-trained TableVLM can improve the performance up to 1.97% in tree-editing-distancescore on ComplexTable. Leiyuan Chen, Chengsong Huang, Xiaoqing Zheng, Jinshu Lin, Xuanjing Huang 0001 |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2021 | Revisiting the Negative Data of Distantly Supervised Relation ExtractionabstractChenhao Xie, Jiaqing Liang, Jingping Liu, Chengsong Huang, Wenhao Huang, Yanghua Xiao. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021. Chenhao Xie 0002, Jiaqing Liang, Chengsong Huang, Yanghua Xiao |
ACL/IJCNLP (1) | 4 |
| 2021 | WebKE: Knowledge Extraction from Semi-structured Web with Pre-trained Markup Language ModelabstractThe World Wide Web contains rich up-to-date information for knowledge graph construction. However, most current relation extraction techniques are designed for free text and thus do not handle well semi-structured web content. In this paper, we propose a novel multi-phase machine reading framework, called WebKE. It processes the web content on different granularity by first detecting areas of interest at DOM tree node level and then extracting relational triples for each area. We also propose HTMLBERT as an encoder the web content. It is a pre-trained markup language model that fully leverages the visual layout information and DOM-tree structure, without the need of hand engineered features. Experimental results show that the proposed approach outperforms state-of- the-art methods by a considerable gain. The source code is available at https://github.com/redreamality/webke. Chenhao Xie 0002, Jiaqing Liang, Chengsong Huang, Yanghua Xiao |
CIKM | 4 |