Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shogo Murai
dblp:211/2849
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 72% Algorithms and data structures · 28% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Graph algorithms and graph theory
centrality |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Sensitivity Analysis of Centralities on Unweighted Networks · WWW 2019 Theoretically and Empirically High Quality Estimation of Closeness Centrality · ICDM 2017 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory
graph similarity |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Estimating Walk-Based Similarities Using Random Walk · WWW 2019 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › random walk
random-walk similarity |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Estimating Walk-Based Similarities Using Random Walk · WWW 2019 |
Algorithms and data structures
randomized algorithms |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Theoretically and Empirically High Quality Estimation of Closeness Centrality · ICDM 2017 |
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms › sampling
sampling-based estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Theoretically and Empirically High Quality Estimation of Closeness Centrality · ICDM 2017 |
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining |
0.2 | 2 | 2019 | Sensitivity Analysis of Centralities on Unweighted Networks · WWW 2019 Estimating Walk-Based Similarities Using Random Walk · WWW 2019 |
Data mining
network analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Sensitivity Analysis of Centralities on Unweighted Networks · WWW 2019 |
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining › network structure analysis
node similarity |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Estimating Walk-Based Similarities Using Random Walk · WWW 2019 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
network analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Theoretically and Empirically High Quality Estimation of Closeness Centrality · ICDM 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sensitivity analysis · 0.8random walk · 0.8personalized pagerank · 0.8sampling-based estimation · 0.3relative error bounds · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | A Scaling Law for Syn2real Transfer: How Much Is Your Pre-training Effective?
Hiroaki Mikami, Kenji Fukumizu, Shogo Murai, Shuji Suzuki, Yuta Kikuchi, Taiji Suzuki, Shin-ichi Maeda, Kohei Hayashi |
ECML/PKDD (3) | 3 |
| 2019 | Estimating Walk-Based Similarities Using Random WalkabstractMeasuring similarities between vertices is an important task in network analysis, which has numerous applications. One major approach to define a similarity between vertices is by accumulating weights of walks between them that encompasses personalized PageRank (PPR) and Katz similarity. Although many effective methods for PPR based on efficient simulation of random walks have been proposed, these techniques cannot be applied to other walk-based similarity notions because the random walk interpretation is only valid for PPR. Shogo Murai, Yuichi Yoshida |
WWW | 1 |
| 2019 | Sensitivity Analysis of Centralities on Unweighted NetworksabstractRevealing important vertices is a fundamental task in network analysis. As such, many indicators have been proposed for doing so, which are collectively called centralities. However, the abundance of studies on centralities blurs their differences. Shogo Murai, Yuichi Yoshida |
WWW | 1 |
| 2017 | Theoretically and Empirically High Quality Estimation of Closeness CentralityabstractIn the field of network analysis, centrality values of graph nodes, which represents the importance of nodes, have been widely studied. In this paper, we focus on one of the most basic centrality measures: closeness centrality. Since the exact computation of closeness centrality for all nodes of a network is prohibitively costly for massive networks, algorithms for estimating closeness centrality have been studied. In previous works, theoretical bounds on relative error have been improved. However, for complex networks such as social networks, empirical estimation qualities have hardly been improved since the sampling-based algorithm was proposed. In this paper, we propose simple and highly scalable algorithms for estimating closeness centrality of undirected networks. Our algorithms have theoretically and empirically better estimation quality than previous ones. As a result, our algorithms achieve strong quality guarantees and experimentally small relative errors at the same time. Also, our algorithms can be extended to strongly connected directed networks. Moreover, we can apply our algorithms to weighted centrality, in which nodes may have different weight, with slight modification. Shogo Murai |
ICDM | 1 |