Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shogo Murai

dblp:211/2849 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 72% Algorithms and data structures · 28%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory
centrality
0.722019
Sensitivity Analysis of Centralities on Unweighted Networks · WWW 2019
Theoretically and Empirically High Quality Estimation of Closeness Centrality · ICDM 2017
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory
graph similarity
0.412019
Estimating Walk-Based Similarities Using Random Walk · WWW 2019
Graph algorithms and graph theory › random walk
random-walk similarity
0.412019
Estimating Walk-Based Similarities Using Random Walk · WWW 2019
Algorithms and data structures
randomized algorithms
0.312017
Theoretically and Empirically High Quality Estimation of Closeness Centrality · ICDM 2017
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms › sampling
sampling-based estimation
0.312017
Theoretically and Empirically High Quality Estimation of Closeness Centrality · ICDM 2017
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining
0.222019
Sensitivity Analysis of Centralities on Unweighted Networks · WWW 2019
Estimating Walk-Based Similarities Using Random Walk · WWW 2019
Data mining
network analysis
0.112019
Sensitivity Analysis of Centralities on Unweighted Networks · WWW 2019
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining › network structure analysis
node similarity
0.112019
Estimating Walk-Based Similarities Using Random Walk · WWW 2019
Graph algorithms and graph theory
network analysis
0.112017
Theoretically and Empirically High Quality Estimation of Closeness Centrality · ICDM 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sensitivity analysis · 0.8random walk · 0.8personalized pagerank · 0.8sampling-based estimation · 0.3relative error bounds · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 A Scaling Law for Syn2real Transfer: How Much Is Your Pre-training Effective?
Hiroaki Mikami, Kenji Fukumizu, Shogo Murai, Shuji Suzuki, Yuta Kikuchi, Taiji Suzuki, Shin-ichi Maeda, Kohei Hayashi
ECML/PKDD (3)3
2019 Estimating Walk-Based Similarities Using Random Walk
abstract
Measuring similarities between vertices is an important task in network analysis, which has numerous applications. One major approach to define a similarity between vertices is by accumulating weights of walks between them that encompasses personalized PageRank (PPR) and Katz similarity. Although many effective methods for PPR based on efficient simulation of random walks have been proposed, these techniques cannot be applied to other walk-based similarity notions because the random walk interpretation is only valid for PPR.
Shogo Murai, Yuichi Yoshida
WWW1
2019 Sensitivity Analysis of Centralities on Unweighted Networks
abstract
Revealing important vertices is a fundamental task in network analysis. As such, many indicators have been proposed for doing so, which are collectively called centralities. However, the abundance of studies on centralities blurs their differences.
Shogo Murai, Yuichi Yoshida
WWW1
2017 Theoretically and Empirically High Quality Estimation of Closeness Centrality
abstract
In the field of network analysis, centrality values of graph nodes, which represents the importance of nodes, have been widely studied. In this paper, we focus on one of the most basic centrality measures: closeness centrality. Since the exact computation of closeness centrality for all nodes of a network is prohibitively costly for massive networks, algorithms for estimating closeness centrality have been studied. In previous works, theoretical bounds on relative error have been improved. However, for complex networks such as social networks, empirical estimation qualities have hardly been improved since the sampling-based algorithm was proposed. In this paper, we propose simple and highly scalable algorithms for estimating closeness centrality of undirected networks. Our algorithms have theoretically and empirically better estimation quality than previous ones. As a result, our algorithms achieve strong quality guarantees and experimentally small relative errors at the same time. Also, our algorithms can be extended to strongly connected directed networks. Moreover, we can apply our algorithms to weighted centrality, in which nodes may have different weight, with slight modification.
Shogo Murai
ICDM1