Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ritwick Chaudhry

dblp:211/4019 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Graph learning · 36% Image recognition and object detection · 36% Video understanding and tracking · 18%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph convolutional network
0.512021
Scene Graph Embeddings Using Relative Similarity Supervision · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.512021
Scene Graph Embeddings Using Relative Similarity Supervision · AAAI 2021
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object discovery
0.512021
Track, Check, Repeat: An EM Approach to Unsupervised Tracking · CVPR 2021
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
object tracking
0.512021
Track, Check, Repeat: An EM Approach to Unsupervised Tracking · CVPR 2021
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object discovery
unsupervised object discovery
0.512021
Track, Check, Repeat: An EM Approach to Unsupervised Tracking · CVPR 2021
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
image retrieval
0.512021
Scene Graph Embeddings Using Relative Similarity Supervision · AAAI 2021
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › image retrieval
semantic image retrieval
0.512021
Scene Graph Embeddings Using Relative Similarity Supervision · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.112021
Scene Graph Embeddings Using Relative Similarity Supervision · AAAI 2021
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene understanding › dynamic 3d scene understanding
RGB-D video understanding
0.112021
Track, Check, Repeat: An EM Approach to Unsupervised Tracking · CVPR 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

triple sampling · 1.0ranking loss · 1.0graph convolutional network · 1.0contrastive learning · 1.0optical flow · 0.5expectation-maximization · 0.5ensemble learning · 0.5data augmentation · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Scene Graph Embeddings Using Relative Similarity Supervision
abstract
Scene graphs are a powerful structured representation of the underlying content of images, and embeddings derived from them have been shown to be useful in multiple downstream tasks. In this work, we employ a graph convolutional network to exploit structure in scene graphs and produce image embeddings useful for semantic image retrieval. Different from classification-centric supervision traditionally available for learning image representations, we address the task of learning from relative similarity labels in a ranking context. Rooted within the contrastive learning paradigm, we propose a novel loss function that operates on pairs of similar and dissimilar images and imposes relative ordering between them in embedding space. We demonstrate that this Ranking loss, coupled with an intuitive triple sampling strategy, leads to robust representations that outperform well-known contrastive losses on the retrieval task. In addition, we provide qualitative evidence of how retrieved results that utilize structured scene information capture the global context of the scene, different from visual similarity search.
Paridhi Maheshwari, Ritwick Chaudhry, Vishwa Vinay
AAAI2
2021 Track, Check, Repeat: An EM Approach to Unsupervised Tracking
abstract
We propose an unsupervised method for detecting and tracking moving objects in 3D, in unlabelled RGB-D videos. The method begins with classic handcrafted techniques for segmenting objects using motion cues: we estimate optical flow and camera motion, and conservatively segment regions that appear to be moving independently of the background. Treating these initial segments as pseudo-labels, we learn an ensemble of appearance-based 2D and 3D detectors, under heavy data augmentation. We use this ensemble to detect new instances of the "moving" type, even if they are not moving, and add these as new pseudo-labels. Our method is an expectation-maximization algorithm, where in the expectation step we fire all modules and look for agreement among them, and in the maximization step we re-train the modules to improve this agreement. The constraint of ensemble agreement helps combat contamination of the generated pseudo-labels (during the E step), and data augmentation helps the modules generalize to yetunlabelled data (during the M step). We compare against existing unsupervised object discovery and tracking methods, using challenging videos from CATER and KITTI, and show strong improvements over the state-of-the-art.
Adam W. Harley, Yiming Zuo 0001, Ayush Mangal, Shubhankar Potdar, Ritwick Chaudhry, Katerina Fragkiadaki
CVPR6
2020 LEAF-QA: Locate, Encode & Attend for Figure Question Answering
abstract
We introduce LEAF-QA, a comprehensive dataset of 250,000 densely annotated figures/charts, constructed from real-world open data sources, along with 2 million question-answer (QA) pairs querying the structure and semantics of these charts. LEAF-QA highlights the problem of multimodal QA, which is notably different from conventional visual QA (VQA), and has recently gained interest in the community. Furthermore, LEAF-QA is significantly more complex than previous attempts at chart QA, viz. FigureQA and DVQA, which present only limited variations in chart data. LEAF-QA being constructed from real-world sources, requires a novel architecture to enable question answering. To this end, LEAF-Net, a deep architecture involving chart element localization, question and answer encoding in terms of chart elements, and an attention network is proposed. Different experiments are conducted to demonstrate the challenges of QA on LEAF-QA. The proposed architecture, LEAF-Net also considerably advances the current state-of-the-art on FigureQA and DVQA.
Ritwick Chaudhry, Pranav Maneriker, Prann Bansal, Ajay Joshi
WACV1
2019 ICDAR 2019 Competition on Harvesting Raw Tables from Infographics (CHART-Infographics)
abstract
This work summarizes the results of the first Competition on Harvesting Raw Tables from Infographics (ICDAR 2019 CHART-Infographics). The complex process of automatic chart recognition is divided into multiple tasks for the purpose of this competition, including Chart Image Classification (Task 1), Text Detection and Recognition (Task 2), Text Role Classification (Task 3), Axis Analysis (Task 4), Legend Analysis (Task 5), Plot Element Detection and Classification (Task 6.a), Data Extraction (Task 6.b), and End-to-End Data Extraction (Task 7). We provided a large synthetic training set and evaluated submitted systems using newly proposed metrics on both synthetic charts and manually-annotated real charts taken from scientific literature. A total of 8 groups registered for the competition out of which 5 submitted results for tasks 1-5. The results show that some tasks can be performed highly accurately on synthetic data, but all systems did not perform as well on real world charts. The data, annotation tools, and evaluation scripts have been publicly released for academic use.
Kenny Davila, Bhargava Urala Kota, Srirangaraj Setlur, Venu Govindaraju, Chris Tensmeyer, Ritwick Chaudhry
ICDAR7
2019 AB Initio Tomography With Object Heterogeneity and Unknown Viewing Paramete
Arunabh Ghosh, Ritwick Chaudhry, Ajit Rajwade 0001
ICIP2
2018 Modeling Hint-Taking Behavior and Knowledge State of Students with Multi-Task Learning
Harvineet Singh, Shiv Kumar Saini, Ritwick Chaudhry, Pradeep Dogga
EDM3