Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nilah M. Ioannidis

dblp:211/6151 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0001-9628-8229ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.722020
Predicting target genes of non-coding regulatory variants with IRT · Bioinform. 2020
FIRE: functional inference of genetic variants that regulate gene expression · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
regulatory variant interpretation
0.412020
Predicting target genes of non-coding regulatory variants with IRT · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › functional genomics
eQTL mapping
0.422020
FIRE: functional inference of genetic variants that regulate gene expression · Bioinform. 2017
Predicting target genes of non-coding regulatory variants with IRT · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation › regulatory variant interpretation
regulatory variant prediction
0.312017
FIRE: functional inference of genetic variants that regulate gene expression · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genome-wide association study
0.112020
Predicting target genes of non-coding regulatory variants with IRT · Bioinform. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random forest · 0.7machine learning · 0.4feature analysis · 0.4genomic annotation · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Predicting target genes of non-coding regulatory variants with IRT
abstract
SUMMARY: Interpreting genetic variants of unknown significance (VUS) is essential in clinical applications of genome sequencing for diagnosis and personalized care. Non-coding variants remain particularly difficult to interpret, despite making up a large majority of trait associations identified in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) analyses. Predicting the regulatory effects of non-coding variants on candidate genes is a key step in evaluating their clinical significance. Here, we develop a machine-learning algorithm, Inference of Connected expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) (IRT), to predict the regulatory targets of non-coding variants identified in studies of eQTLs. We assemble datasets using eQTL results from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project and learn to separate positive and negative pairs based on annotations characterizing the variant, gene and the intermediate sequence. IRT achieves an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.799 using random cross-validation, and 0.700 for a more stringent position-based cross-validation. Further evaluation on rare variants and experimentally validated regulatory variants shows a significant enrichment in IRT identifying the true target genes versus negative controls. In gene-ranking experiments, IRT achieves a top-1 accuracy of 50% and top-3 accuracy of 90%. Salient features, including GC-content, histone modifications and Hi-C interactions are further analyzed and visualized to illustrate their influences on predictions. IRT can be applied to any VUS of interest and each candidate nearby gene to output a score reflecting the likelihood of regulatory effect on the expression level. These scores can be used to prioritize variants and genes to assist in patient diagnosis and GWAS follow-up studies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Codes and data used in this work are available at https://github.com/miaecle/eQTL_Trees. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Zhenqin Wu, Nilah M. Ioannidis, James Zou 0001, Russell Schwartz
Bioinform.2
2017 FIRE: functional inference of genetic variants that regulate gene expression
abstract
MOTIVATION: Interpreting genetic variation in noncoding regions of the genome is an important challenge for personal genome analysis. One mechanism by which noncoding single nucleotide variants (SNVs) influence downstream phenotypes is through the regulation of gene expression. Methods to predict whether or not individual SNVs are likely to regulate gene expression would aid interpretation of variants of unknown significance identified in whole-genome sequencing studies. RESULTS: We developed FIRE (Functional Inference of Regulators of Expression), a tool to score both noncoding and coding SNVs based on their potential to regulate the expression levels of nearby genes. FIRE consists of 23 random forests trained to recognize SNVs in cis-expression quantitative trait loci (cis-eQTLs) using a set of 92 genomic annotations as predictive features. FIRE scores discriminate cis-eQTL SNVs from non-eQTL SNVs in the training set with a cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.807, and discriminate cis-eQTL SNVs shared across six populations of different ancestry from non-eQTL SNVs with an AUC of 0.939. FIRE scores are also predictive of cis-eQTL SNVs across a variety of tissue types. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: FIRE scores for genome-wide SNVs in hg19/GRCh37 are available for download at https://sites.google.com/site/fireregulatoryvariation/. CONTACT: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Nilah M. Ioannidis, Joe R. Davis, Marianne K. DeGorter, Nicholas B. Larson, Shannon K. McDonnell, Amy J. French, Alexis J. Battle, Trevor J. Hastie, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Stephen B. Montgomery, Carlos D. Bustamante, Weiva Sieh, Alice S. Whittemore
Bioinform.1