Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jana Ebler
dblp:211/6651
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-0382-3702ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
de bruijn graph |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | BubbleGun: enumerating bubbles and superbubbles in genome graphs · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
genome assembly |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | BubbleGun: enumerating bubbles and superbubbles in genome graphs · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › genome analysis
genome graph |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | BubbleGun: enumerating bubbles and superbubbles in genome graphs · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genomic variant analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Genotyping inversions and tandem duplications · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › structural variation
structural variant genotyping |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Genotyping inversions and tandem duplications · Bioinform. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
bloom filter · 0.6split alignments · 0.3maximum likelihood estimation · 0.3breakpoint-spanning read pairs · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | BubbleGun: enumerating bubbles and superbubbles in genome graphsabstractMOTIVATION: With the fast development of sequencing technology, accurate de novo genome assembly is now possible even for larger genomes. Graph-based representations of genomes arise both as part of the assembly process, but also in the context of pangenomes representing a population. In both cases, polymorphic loci lead to bubble structures in such graphs. Detecting bubbles is hence an important task when working with genomic variants in the context of genome graphs. RESULTS: Here, we present a fast general-purpose tool, called BubbleGun, for detecting bubbles and superbubbles in genome graphs. Furthermore, BubbleGun detects and outputs runs of linearly connected bubbles and superbubbles, which we call bubble chains. We showcase its utility on de Bruijn graphs and compare our results to vg's snarl detection. We show that BubbleGun is considerably faster than vg especially in bigger graphs, where it reports all bubbles in less than 30 min on a human sample de Bruijn graph of around 2 million nodes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: BubbleGun is available and documented as a Python3 package at https://github.com/fawaz-dabbaghieh/bubble_gun under MIT license. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Fawaz Dabbaghie, Jana Ebler, Tobias Marschall |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2017 | Genotyping inversions and tandem duplicationsabstractMOTIVATION: Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) has enabled studying structural genomic variants (SVs) such as duplications and inversions in large cohorts. SVs have been shown to play important roles in multiple diseases, including cancer. As costs for NGS continue to decline and variant databases become ever more complete, the relevance of genotyping also SVs from NGS data increases steadily, which is in stark contrast to the lack of tools to do so. RESULTS: We introduce a novel statistical approach, called DIGTYPER (Duplication and Inversion GenoTYPER), which computes genotype likelihoods for a given inversion or duplication and reports the maximum likelihood genotype. In contrast to purely coverage-based approaches, DIGTYPER uses breakpoint-spanning read pairs as well as split alignments for genotyping, enabling typing also of small events. We tested our approach on simulated and on real data and compared the genotype predictions to those made by DELLY, which discovers SVs and computes genotypes, and SVTyper, a genotyping program used to genotype variants detected by LUMPY. DIGTYPER compares favorable especially for duplications (of all lengths) and for shorter inversions (up to 300 bp). In contrast to DELLY, our approach can genotype SVs from data bases without having to rediscover them. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://bitbucket.org/jana_ebler/digtyper.git. CONTACT: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Jana Ebler, Alexander Schönhuth, Tobias Marschall |
Bioinform. | 1 |