Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maximilian Ilse

dblp:211/6986 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0005-8712-7307ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 35% Generative modeling · 20% Vision and language · 17%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › image editing
diffusion-based image editing
0.812024
RadEdit: Stress-Testing Biomedical Vision Models via Diffusion Image Editing · ECCV (12) 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.812024
RadEdit: Stress-Testing Biomedical Vision Models via Diffusion Image Editing · ECCV (12) 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.812024
RadEdit: Stress-Testing Biomedical Vision Models via Diffusion Image Editing · ECCV (12) 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › model robustness evaluation
stress testing
0.812024
RadEdit: Stress-Testing Biomedical Vision Models via Diffusion Image Editing · ECCV (12) 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal representation
vision-language representation learning
0.712023
Learning to Exploit Temporal Structure for Biomedical Vision-Language Processing · CVPR 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation
0.512021
Selecting Data Augmentation for Simulating Interventions · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain generalization
0.512021
Selecting Data Augmentation for Simulating Interventions · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
spurious correlation
0.512021
Selecting Data Augmentation for Simulating Interventions · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › aggregation function
attention-based aggregation
0.312018
Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learning · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.312018
Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learning · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multiple instance learning
0.312018
Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learning · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
training data attribution
0.312018
Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learning · ICML 2018
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › medical image analysis
disease classification
0.212023
Learning to Exploit Temporal Structure for Biomedical Vision-Language Processing · CVPR 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

image editing · 0.8diffusion model · 0.8self-supervised learning · 0.7multi-image encoder · 0.7CNN-Transformer hybrid · 0.7data augmentation · 0.5causal inference · 0.5permutation-invariant aggregation · 0.3attention mechanism · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 RadEdit: Stress-Testing Biomedical Vision Models via Diffusion Image Editing
Fernando Pérez-García, Sam Bond-Taylor, Pedro P. Sanchez, Boris van Breugel, Daniel C. Castro, Harshita Sharma, Valentina Salvatelli, Maria Wetscherek, Hannah Richardson, Matthew P. Lungren, Aditya V. Nori, Javier Alvarez-Valle, Ozan Oktay, Maximilian Ilse
ECCV (12)14
2023 Learning to Exploit Temporal Structure for Biomedical Vision-Language Processing
abstract
Self-supervised learning in vision-language processing (VLP) exploits semantic alignment between imaging and text modalities. Prior work in biomedical VLP has mostly relied on the alignment of single image and report pairs even though clinical notes commonly refer to prior images. This does not only introduce poor alignment between the modalities but also a missed opportunity to exploit rich self-supervision through existing temporal content in the data. In this work, we explicitly account for prior images and reports when available during both training and fine-tuning. Our approach, named BioViL-T, uses a CNN-Transformer hybrid multi-image encoder trained jointly with a text model. It is designed to be versatile to arising challenges such as pose variations and missing input images across time. The resulting model excels on downstream tasks both in single- and multi-image setups, achieving state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on (I) progression classification, (II) phrase grounding, and (III) report generation, whilst offering consistent improvements on disease classification and sentence-similarity tasks. We release a novel multi-modal temporal benchmark dataset, MS-CXR-T, to quantify the quality of vision-language representations in terms of temporal semantics. Our experimental results show the advantages of incorporating prior images and reports to make most use of the data.
Shruthi Bannur, Stephanie L. Hyland, Qianchu Liu, Fernando Pérez-García, Maximilian Ilse, Daniel C. Castro, Benedikt Boecking, Harshita Sharma, Kenza Bouzid, Anja Thieme, Anton Schwaighofer, Maria Wetscherek, Matthew P. Lungren, Aditya V. Nori, Javier Alvarez-Valle, Ozan Oktay
CVPR5
2021 Selecting Data Augmentation for Simulating Interventions
abstract
Machine learning models trained with purely observational data and the principle of empirical risk minimization (Vapnik 1992) can fail to generalize to unseen domains. In this paper, we focus on the case where the problem arises through spurious correlation between the observed domains and the actual task labels. We find that many domain generalization methods do not explicitly take this spurious correlation into account. Instead, especially in more application-oriented research areas like medical imaging or robotics, data augmentation techniques that are based on heuristics are used to learn domain invariant features. To bridge the gap between theory and practice, we develop a causal perspective on the problem of domain generalization. We argue that causal concepts can be used to explain the success of data augmentation by describing how they can weaken the spurious correlation between the observed domains and the task labels. We demonstrate that data augmentation can serve as a tool for simulating interventional data. We use these theoretical insights to derive a simple algorithm that is able to select data augmentation techniques that will lead to better domain generalization.
Maximilian Ilse, Jakub M. Tomczak, Patrick Forré
ICML1
2018 Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learning
abstract
Multiple instance learning (MIL) is a variation of supervised learning where a single class label is assigned to a bag of instances. In this paper, we state the MIL problem as learning the Bernoulli distribution of the bag label where the bag label probability is fully parameterized by neural networks. Furthermore, we propose a neural network-based permutation-invariant aggregation operator that corresponds to the attention mechanism. Notably, an application of the proposed attention-based operator provides insight into the contribution of each instance to the bag label. We show empirically that our approach achieves comparable performance to the best MIL methods on benchmark MIL datasets and it outperforms other methods on a MNIST-based MIL dataset and two real-life histopathology datasets without sacrificing interpretability.
Maximilian Ilse, Jakub M. Tomczak, Max Welling
ICML1