Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Antoine Simoulin

dblp:211/7662 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Language models and text generation · 36% Efficient and distributed learning · 22% Graph learning · 21%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
code reasoning
0.912025
Code to Think, Think to Code: A Survey on Code-Enhanced Reasoning and Reasoning-Driven Code Intelligence in LLMs · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › memory-efficient training
activation memory reduction
0.812024
Memory-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Transformers via Token Selection · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network training › local learning
forward-forward algorithm
0.812024
Forward Learning of Graph Neural Networks · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network training
0.812024
Forward Learning of Graph Neural Networks · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › memory-efficient training
memory-efficient fine-tuning
0.812024
Memory-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Transformers via Token Selection · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
transformer fine-tuning
0.812024
Memory-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Transformers via Token Selection · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection
0.712023
GLEMOS: Benchmark for Instantaneous Graph Learning Model Selection · NeurIPS 2023
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models
0.312025
Code to Think, Think to Code: A Survey on Code-Enhanced Reasoning and Reasoning-Driven Code Intelligence in LLMs · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model reasoning · 1.7token selection · 0.8local layer-wise training · 0.8gradient approximation · 0.8forward learning · 0.8LoRA · 0.8model selection techniques · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Code to Think, Think to Code: A Survey on Code-Enhanced Reasoning and Reasoning-Driven Code Intelligence in LLMs
abstract
Dayu Yang, Tianyang Liu, Daoan Zhang, Antoine Simoulin, Xiaoyi Liu, Yuwei Cao, Zhaopu Teng, Xin Qian, Grey Yang, Jiebo Luo, Julian McAuley. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2025.
Dayu Yang, Tianyang Liu 0003, Daoan Zhang, Antoine Simoulin, Yuwei Cao, Zhaopu Teng, Grey Yang, Jiebo Luo 0001, Julian J. McAuley
EMNLP4
2024 Memory-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Transformers via Token Selection
abstract
Fine-tuning provides an effective means to specialize pre-trained models for various downstream tasks.However, fine-tuning often incurs high memory overhead, especially for large transformer-based models, such as LLMs.While existing methods may reduce certain parts of the memory required for fine-tuning, they still require caching all intermediate activations computed in the forward pass to update weights during the backward pass.In this work, we develop TOKENTUNE, a method to reduce memory usage, specifically the memory to store intermediate activations, in the finetuning of transformer-based models.During the backward pass, TOKENTUNE approximates the gradient computation by backpropagating through just a subset of input tokens.Thus, with TOKENTUNE, only a subset of intermediate activations are cached during the forward pass.Also, TOKENTUNE can be easily combined with existing methods like LoRA, further reducing the memory cost.We evaluate our approach on pre-trained transformer models with up to billions of parameters, considering the performance on multiple downstream tasks such as text classification and question answering in a few-shot learning setup.Overall, TOKENTUNE achieves performance on par with full fine-tuning or representative memoryefficient fine-tuning methods, while greatly reducing the memory footprint, especially when combined with other methods with complementary memory reduction mechanisms.We hope that our approach will facilitate the finetuning of large transformers, in specializing them for specific domains or co-training them with other neural components from a larger system.Our code is available at https://github. com/facebookresearch/tokentune.
Antoine Simoulin, Namyong Park 0001, Grey Yang
EMNLP1
2024 Forward Learning of Graph Neural Networks
abstract
Graph neural networks (GNNs) have achieved remarkable success across a wide range of applications, such as recommendation, drug discovery, and question answering. Behind the success of GNNs lies the backpropagation (BP) algorithm, which is the de facto standard for training deep neural networks (NNs). However, despite its effectiveness, BP imposes several constraints, which are not only biologically implausible, but also limit the scalability, parallelism, and flexibility in learning NNs. Examples of such constraints include storage of neural activities computed in the forward pass for use in the subsequent backward pass, and the dependence of parameter updates on non-local signals. To address these limitations, the forward-forward algorithm (FF) was recently proposed as an alternative to BP in the image classification domain, which trains NNs by performing two forward passes over positive and negative data. Inspired by this advance, we propose ForwardGNN in this work, a new forward learning procedure for GNNs, which avoids the constraints imposed by BP via an effective layer-wise local forward training. ForwardGNN extends the original FF to deal with graph data and GNNs, and makes it possible to operate without generating negative inputs (hence no longer forward-forward). Further, ForwardGNN enables each layer to learn from both the bottom-up and top-down signals without relying on the backpropagation of errors. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets show the effectiveness and generality of the proposed forward graph learning framework. We release our code at https://github.com/facebookresearch/forwardgnn.
Namyong Park 0001, Antoine Simoulin, Grey Yang, Ryan Rossi, Puja Trivedi, Nesreen K. Ahmed
ICLR3
2023 GLEMOS: Benchmark for Instantaneous Graph Learning Model Selection
abstract
The choice of a graph learning (GL) model (i.e., a GL algorithm and its hyperparameter settings) has a significant impact on the performance of downstream tasks. However, selecting the right GL model becomes increasingly difficult and time consuming as more and more GL models are developed. Accordingly, it is of great significance and practical value to equip users of GL with the ability to perform a near-instantaneous selection of an effective GL model without manual intervention. Despite the recent attempts to tackle this important problem, there has been no comprehensive benchmark environment to evaluate the performance of GL model selection methods. To bridge this gap, we present GLEMOS in this work, a comprehensive benchmark for instantaneous GL model selection that makes the following contributions. (i) GLEMOS provides extensive benchmark data for fundamental GL tasks, i.e., link prediction and node classification, including the performances of 366 models on 457 graphs on these tasks. (ii) GLEMOS designs multiple evaluation settings, and assesses how effectively representative model selection techniques perform in these different settings. (iii) GLEMOS is designed to be easily extended with new models, new graphs, and new performance records. (iv) Based on the experimental results, we discuss the limitations of existing approaches and highlight future research directions. To promote research on this significant problem, we make the benchmark data and code publicly available at https://namyongpark.github.io/glemos.
Namyong Park 0001, Ryan Rossi, Antoine Simoulin, Nesreen K. Ahmed, Christos Faloutsos
NeurIPS4