Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander A. Makarov

dblp:212/0327 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction › protein-protein docking
docking model quality assessment
0.312018
Meta-server for automatic analysis, scoring and ranking of docking models · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
protein-protein docking
0.312018
Meta-server for automatic analysis, scoring and ranking of docking models · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein-protein interaction prediction
interaction site prediction
0.112018
Meta-server for automatic analysis, scoring and ranking of docking models · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein-protein interaction prediction
0.112018
Meta-server for automatic analysis, scoring and ranking of docking models · Bioinform. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

scoring function · 0.3meta-server · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 A novel approach for predicting protein S-glutathionylation
abstract
BACKGROUND: S-glutathionylation is the formation of disulfide bonds between the tripeptide glutathione and cysteine residues of the protein, protecting them from irreversible oxidation and in some cases causing change in their functions. Regulatory glutathionylation of proteins is a controllable and reversible process associated with cell response to the changing redox status. Prediction of cysteine residues that undergo glutathionylation allows us to find new target proteins, which function can be altered in pathologies associated with impaired redox status. We set out to analyze this issue and create new tool for predicting S-glutathionylated cysteine residues. RESULTS: One hundred forty proteins with experimentally proven S-glutathionylated cysteine residues were found in the literature and the RedoxDB database. These proteins contain 1018 non-S-glutathionylated cysteines and 235 S-glutathionylated ones. Based on 235 S-glutathionylated cysteines, non-redundant positive dataset of 221 heptapeptide sequences of S-glutathionylated cysteines was made. Based on 221 heptapeptide sequences, a position-specific matrix was created by analyzing the protein sequence near the cysteine residue (three amino acid residues before and three after the cysteine). We propose the method for calculating the glutathionylation propensity score, which utilizes the position-specific matrix and a criterion for predicting glutathionylated peptides. CONCLUSION: Non-S-glutathionylated sites were enriched by cysteines in - 3 and + 3 positions. The proposed prediction method demonstrates 76.6% of correct predictions of S-glutathionylated cysteines. This method can be used for detecting new glutathionylation sites, especially in proteins with an unknown structure.
Anastasya A. Anashkina, Yuri M. Poluektov, Vladimir A. Dmitriev, Eugene N. Kuznetsov, Vladimir A. Mitkevich, Alexander A. Makarov, Irina Yu. Petrushanko
BMC Bioinform.6
2018 Meta-server for automatic analysis, scoring and ranking of docking models
abstract
MOTIVATION: Modelling with multiple servers that use different algorithms for docking results in more reliable predictions of interaction sites. However, the scoring and comparison of all models by an expert is time-consuming and is not feasible for large volumes of data generated by such modelling. RESULTS: Quality ASsessment of DOcking Models (QASDOM) Server is a simple and efficient tool for real-time simultaneous analysis, scoring and ranking of data sets of receptor-ligand complexes built by a range of docking techniques. This meta-server is designed to analyse large data sets of docking models and rank them by scoring criteria developed in this study. It produces two types of output showing the likelihood of specific residues and clusters of residues to be involved in receptor-ligand interactions and the ranking of models. The server also allows visualizing residues that form interaction sites in the receptor and ligand sequence and displays 3D model structures of the receptor-ligand complexes. AVAILABILITY: http://qasdom.eimb.ru. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Anastasya A. Anashkina, Yuri Kravatsky, Eugene N. Kuznetsov, Alexander A. Makarov, Alexei A. Adzhubei
Bioinform.4