Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arianna Yuan

dblp:212/4263 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 4 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 4 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 40% Learning theory · 22% Question answering and dialogue systems · 18%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
coreference resolution
0.412020
CorefQA: Coreference Resolution as Query-based Span Prediction · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
span prediction
0.412020
CorefQA: Coreference Resolution as Query-based Span Prediction · ACL 2020
Usability and user experience research › evaluation methodology
interface evaluation
0.412020
Modeling Human Visual Search Performance on Realistic Webpages Using Analytical and Deep Learning Methods · CHI 2020
Usability and user experience research › cognitive modeling
visual search modeling
0.412020
Modeling Human Visual Search Performance on Realistic Webpages Using Analytical and Deep Learning Methods · CHI 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chinese language processing
0.412019
Is Word Segmentation Necessary for Deep Learning of Chinese Representations? · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction
0.412019
Entity-Relation Extraction as Multi-Turn Question Answering · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
word segmentation
0.412019
Is Word Segmentation Necessary for Deep Learning of Chinese Representations? · ACL (1) 2019
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization
0.312018
Bias and Generalization in Deep Generative Models: An Empirical Study · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Learning theory
inductive bias
0.312018
Bias and Generalization in Deep Generative Models: An Empirical Study · NeurIPS 2018
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › interactive question answering
conversational question answering
0.112019
Entity-Relation Extraction as Multi-Turn Question Answering · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
neural language model
0.112019
Is Word Segmentation Necessary for Deep Learning of Chinese Representations? · ACL (1) 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
density estimation
0.112018
Bias and Generalization in Deep Generative Models: An Empirical Study · NeurIPS 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

salience map · 0.4question answering framework · 0.4heuristic features · 0.4deep neural network · 0.4data augmentation · 0.4machine reading comprehension · 0.4empirical study · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 CorefQA: Coreference Resolution as Query-based Span Prediction
abstract
In this paper, we present CorefQA, an accurate and extensible approach for the coreference resolution task.We formulate the problem as a span prediction task, like in question answering: A query is generated for each candidate mention using its surrounding context, and a span prediction module is employed to extract the text spans of the coreferences within the document using the generated query.This formulation comes with the following key advantages: (1) The span prediction strategy provides the flexibility of retrieving mentions left out at the mention proposal stage; (2) In the question answering framework, encoding the mention and its context explicitly in a query makes it possible to have a deep and thorough examination of cues embedded in the context of coreferent mentions; and (3) A plethora of existing question answering datasets can be used for data augmentation to improve the model's generalization capability.Experiments demonstrate significant performance boost over previous models, with 83.1 (+3.5)F1 score on the CoNLL-2012 benchmark and 87.5 (+2.5)F1 score on the GAP benchmark.1
Wei Wu 0044, Fei Wang 0060, Arianna Yuan, Fei Wu 0001, Jiwei Li 0001
ACL3
2020 Modeling Human Visual Search Performance on Realistic Webpages Using Analytical and Deep Learning Methods
abstract
Modeling visual search not only offers an opportunity to predict the usability of an interface before actually testing it on real users but also advances scientific understanding about human behavior. In this work, we first conduct a set of analyses on a large-scale dataset of visual search tasks on realistic webpages. We then present a deep neural network that learns to predict the scannability of webpage content, i.e., how easy it is for a user to find a specific target. Our model leverages both heuristic-based features such as target size and unstructured features such as raw image pixels. This approach allows us to model complex interactions that might be involved in a realistic visual search task, which can not be achieved by traditional analytical models. We analyze the model behavior to offer our insights into how the salience map learned by the model aligns with human intuition.
Arianna Yuan, Yang Li 0058
CHI1
2019 Is Word Segmentation Necessary for Deep Learning of Chinese Representations?
abstract
Segmenting a chunk of text into words is usually the first step of processing Chinese text, but its necessity has rarely been explored.In this paper, we ask the fundamental question of whether Chinese word segmentation (CWS) is necessary for deep learning-based Chinese Natural Language Processing.We benchmark neural word-based models which rely on word segmentation against neural char-based models which do not involve word segmentation in four end-to-end NLP benchmark tasks: language modeling, machine translation, sentence matching/paraphrase and text classification.Through direct comparisons between these two types of models, we find that charbased models consistently outperform wordbased models.Based on these observations, we conduct comprehensive experiments to study why wordbased models underperform char-based models in these deep learning-based NLP tasks.We show that it is because word-based models are more vulnerable to data sparsity and the presence of out-of-vocabulary (OOV) words, and thus more prone to overfitting.We hope this paper could encourage researchers in the community to rethink the necessity of word segmentation in deep learning-based Chinese Natural Language Processing. 1
Xiaoya Li 0001, Yuxian Meng, Xiaofei Sun 0001, Qinghong Han, Arianna Yuan, Jiwei Li 0001
ACL (1)5
2019 Entity-Relation Extraction as Multi-Turn Question Answering
abstract
In this paper, we propose a new paradigm for the task of entity-relation extraction.We cast the task as a multi-turn question answering problem, i.e., the extraction of entities and relations is transformed to the task of identifying answer spans from the context.This multi-turn QA formalization comes with several key advantages: firstly, the question query encodes important information for the entity/relation class we want to identify; secondly, QA provides a natural way of jointly modeling entity and relation; and thirdly, it allows us to exploit the well developed machine reading comprehension (MRC) models.Experiments on the ACE and the CoNLL04 corpora demonstrate that the proposed paradigm significantly outperforms previous best models.We are able to obtain the stateof-the-art results on all of the ACE04, ACE05 and CoNLL04 datasets, increasing the SOTA results on the three datasets to 49.4 (+1.0), 60.2 (+0.6) and 68.9 (+2.1), respectively.Additionally, we construct a newly developed dataset RESUME in Chinese, which requires multi-step reasoning to construct entity dependencies, as opposed to the single-step dependency extraction in the triplet exaction in previous datasets.The proposed multi-turn QA model also achieves the best performance on the RESUME dataset. 1
Xiaoya Li 0001, Fan Yin, Zijun Sun, Xiayu Li, Arianna Yuan, Duo Chai, Mingxin Zhou, Jiwei Li 0001
ACL (1)5
2019 Modeling Number Sense Acquisition in A Number Board Game by Coordinating Verbal, Visual, and Grounded Action Components
Arianna Yuan, James L. McClelland
CogSci1
2018 Understanding the Rational Speech Act model
Arianna Yuan, Will Monroe, Nate Kushman
CogSci1
2018 Bias and Generalization in Deep Generative Models: An Empirical Study
abstract
In high dimensional settings, density estimation algorithms rely crucially on their inductive bias. Despite recent empirical success, the inductive bias of deep generative models is not well understood. In this paper we propose a framework to systematically investigate bias and generalization in deep generative models of images by probing the learning algorithm with carefully designed training datasets. By measuring properties of the learned distribution, we are able to find interesting patterns of generalization. We verify that these patterns are consistent across datasets, common models and architectures.
Shengjia Zhao, Hongyu Ren, Arianna Yuan, Jiaming Song, Noah D. Goodman, Stefano Ermon
NeurIPS3
2017 Domain-General Learning of Neural Network Models to Solve Analogy Task - A Large-Scale Simulation
Arianna Yuan
CogSci1
2016 Emergence of Euclidean geometrical intuitions in hierarchical generative models
Arianna Yuan, Te-Lin Wu, James L. McClelland
CogSci1