Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Carl Trimbach
dblp:212/5200
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-robot interaction · 44% Human-AI interaction · 44% Learning and educational technologies · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-AI interaction
human feedback |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Teaching a Robot Tasks of Arbitrary Complexity via Human Feedback · HRI 2020 |
Human-robot interaction
robot learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Teaching a Robot Tasks of Arbitrary Complexity via Human Feedback · HRI 2020 |
Learning and educational technologies
curriculum learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Teaching a Robot Tasks of Arbitrary Complexity via Human Feedback · HRI 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 0.4formal methods · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Teaching a Robot Tasks of Arbitrary Complexity via Human FeedbackabstractThis paper addresses the problem of training a robot to carry out temporal tasks of arbitrary complexity via evaluative human feedback that can be inaccurate. A key idea explored in our work is a kind of curriculum learning---training the robot to master simple tasks and then building up to more complex tasks. We show how a training procedure, using knowledge of the formal task representation, can decompose and train any task efficiently in the size of its representation. We further provide a set of experiments that support the claim that non-expert human trainers can decompose tasks in a way that is consistent with our theoretical results, with more than half of participants successfully training all of our experimental missions. We compared our algorithm with existing approaches and our experimental results suggest that our method outperforms alternatives, especially when feedback contains mistakes. Carl Trimbach, Jun Ki Lee, Mark K. Ho, Michael L. Littman |
HRI | 2 |
| 2016 | Feature-based Joint Planning and Norm Learning in Collaborative Games
Mark K. Ho, James MacGlashan, Amy Greenwald, Michael L. Littman, Elizabeth Hilliard, Carl Trimbach, Stephen Brawner, Josh Tenenbaum, Max Kleiman-Weiner, Joseph L. Austerweil |
CogSci | 6 |