Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander Spitzer

dblp:212/6085 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 81% Legged, aerial and field robots · 19%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
1.322024
Deep Model Predictive Optimization · ICRA 2024
Feedback Linearization for Quadrotors with a Learned Acceleration Error Model · ICRA 2021
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control
0.812024
Deep Model Predictive Optimization · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning
0.812024
Deep Model Predictive Optimization · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › nonlinear control
feedback linearization
0.512021
Feedback Linearization for Quadrotors with a Learned Acceleration Error Model · ICRA 2021
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
aerial robots
0.422024
Deep Model Predictive Optimization · ICRA 2024
Feedback Linearization for Quadrotors with a Learned Acceleration Error Model · ICRA 2021
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robot control › UAV control
quadrotor trajectory tracking
0.212024
Deep Model Predictive Optimization · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robot control › UAV control
quadrotor control
0.112021
Feedback Linearization for Quadrotors with a Learned Acceleration Error Model · ICRA 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model-free reinforcement learning · 0.8deep learning · 0.8thrust input delay mitigation · 0.5learned error model · 0.5feedback linearization · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Deep Model Predictive Optimization
abstract
A major challenge in robotics is to design robust policies which enable complex and agile behaviors in the real world. On one end of the spectrum, we have model-free reinforcement learning (MFRL), which is incredibly flexible and general but often results in brittle policies. In contrast, model predictive control (MPC) continually re-plans at each time step to remain robust to perturbations and model inaccuracies. However, despite its real-world successes, MPC often under-performs the optimal strategy. This is due to model quality, myopic behavior from short planning horizons, and approximations due to computational constraints. And even with a perfect model and enough compute, MPC can get stuck in bad local optima, depending heavily on the quality of the optimization algorithm. To this end, we propose Deep Model Predictive Optimization (DMPO), which learns the inner-loop of an MPC optimization algorithm directly via experience, specifically tailored to the needs of the control problem. We evaluate DMPO on a real quadrotor agile trajectory tracking task, on which it improves performance over a baseline MPC algorithm for a given computational budget. It can outperform the best MPC algorithm by up to 27% with fewer samples and an end-to-end policy trained with MFRL by 19%. Moreover, because DMPO requires fewer samples, it can also achieve these benefits with 4.3× less memory. When we subject the quadrotor to turbulent wind fields with an attached drag plate, DMPO can adapt zero-shot while still outperforming all baselines. Additional results can be found at https://tinyurl.com/mr2ywmnw.
Jacob Sacks, Rwik Rana, Alexander Spitzer, Guanya Shi, Byron Boots
ICRA4
2021 Feedback Linearization for Quadrotors with a Learned Acceleration Error Model
abstract
This paper enhances the feedback linearization controller for multirotors with a learned acceleration error model and a thrust input delay mitigation model. Feedback linearization controllers are theoretically appealing but their performance suffers on real systems, where the true system does not match the known system model. We take a step in reducing these robustness issues by learning an acceleration error model, applying this model in the position controller, and further propagating it forward to the attitude controller. We show how this approach improves performance over the standard feedback linearization controller in the presence of unmodeled dynamics and repeatable external disturbances in both simulation and hardware experiments. We also show that our thrust control input delay model improves the step response on hardware systems.
Alexander Spitzer, Nathan Michael
ICRA1