EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sebastian Curi
dblp:213/3055
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 53% Motion planning and robot control · 15% Trustworthy machine learning · 10% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Energy systems and smart grids · 100% |
Topics — the 30 heaviest of 32, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
1.5 | 3 | 2022 | Constrained Policy Optimization via Bayesian World Models · ICLR 2022 Combining Pessimism with Optimism for Robust and Efficient Model-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2021 Efficient Model-Based Reinforcement Learning through Optimistic Policy Search and Planning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › trajectory optimization
gradient-based trajectory optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Gradient-Based Trajectory Optimization With Learned Dynamics · ICRA 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning › world model
learned dynamics models |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Gradient-Based Trajectory Optimization With Learned Dynamics · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Gradient-Based Trajectory Optimization With Learned Dynamics · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Gradient-Based Trajectory Optimization With Learned Dynamics · ICRA 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › safe reinforcement learning
constrained policy optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Constrained Policy Optimization via Bayesian World Models · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safe reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Constrained Policy Optimization via Bayesian World Models · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning
world model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Constrained Policy Optimization via Bayesian World Models · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Risk-Averse Offline Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › safe reinforcement learning
risk-sensitive reinforcement learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Risk-Averse Offline Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
robust reinforcement learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Combining Pessimism with Optimism for Robust and Efficient Model-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › safe reinforcement learning › risk-sensitive reinforcement learning
conditional value-at-risk |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Adaptive Sampling for Stochastic Risk-Averse Learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
epistemic uncertainty |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Efficient Model-Based Reinforcement Learning through Optimistic Policy Search and Planning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
exploration-exploitation tradeoff |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Efficient Model-Based Reinforcement Learning through Optimistic Policy Search and Planning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
optimistic exploration |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Efficient Model-Based Reinforcement Learning through Optimistic Policy Search and Planning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › robust learning
risk-averse learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Adaptive Sampling for Stochastic Risk-Averse Learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Adaptive Sampling for Stochastic Risk-Averse Learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Adaptive Sampling for Stochastic Risk-Averse Learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › importance sampling
adaptive importance sampling |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Online Variance Reduction with Mixtures · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Safe Contextual Bayesian Optimization for Sustainable Room Temperature PID Control Tuning · IJCAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
mixture model |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Online Variance Reduction with Mixtures · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
variance reduction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Online Variance Reduction with Mixtures · ICML 2019 |
Energy systems and smart grids
building energy management |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Safe Contextual Bayesian Optimization for Sustainable Room Temperature PID Control Tuning · IJCAI 2019 |
Energy systems and smart grids › building energy management
HVAC control |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Safe Contextual Bayesian Optimization for Sustainable Room Temperature PID Control Tuning · IJCAI 2019 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots
dynamic legged locomotion |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Gradient-Based Trajectory Optimization With Learned Dynamics · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
legged robots |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Gradient-Based Trajectory Optimization With Learned Dynamics · ICRA 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Risk-Averse Offline Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Efficient Model-Based Reinforcement Learning through Optimistic Policy Search and Planning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › regret minimization
sublinear regret |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Efficient Model-Based Reinforcement Learning through Optimistic Policy Search and Planning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
regret minimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Adaptive Sampling for Stochastic Risk-Averse Learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural network dynamics model · 0.7differentiable model learning · 0.7policy optimization · 0.6bayesian world model · 0.6risk-averse objective · 0.5neural network ensemble · 0.5minimax optimization · 0.5distributional reinforcement learning · 0.5hallucinated control · 0.4gaussian process models · 0.4distributionally robust optimization · 0.4determinantal point process · 0.4adaptive sampling · 0.4safe contextual bayesian optimization · 0.4PID control · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Gradient-Based Trajectory Optimization With Learned DynamicsabstractTrajectory optimization methods have achieved an exceptional level of performance on real-world robots in recent years. These methods heavily rely on accurate analytical models of the dynamics, yet some aspects of the physical world can only be captured to a limited extent. An alternative approach is to leverage machine learning techniques to learn a differentiable dynamics model of the system from data. In this work, we use trajectory optimization and model learning for performing highly dynamic and complex tasks with robotic systems in absence of accurate analytical models of the dynamics. We show that a neural network can model highly nonlinear behaviors accurately for large time horizons, from data collected in only 25 minutes of interactions on two distinct robots: (i) the Boston Dynamics Spot and an (ii) RC car. Furthermore, we use the gradients of the neural network to perform gradient-based trajectory optimization. In our hardware experiments, we demonstrate that our learned model can represent complex dynamics for both the Spot and Radio-controlled (RC) car, and gives good performance in combination with trajectory optimization methods. Bhavya Sukhija, Nathanael Köhler, Miguel Zamora, Simon Zimmermann, Sebastian Curi, Andreas Krause 0001, Stelian Coros |
ICRA | 5 |
| 2022 | Constrained Policy Optimization via Bayesian World Models
Yarden As, Ilnura Usmanova, Sebastian Curi, Andreas Krause 0001 |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2021 | Logistic Q-LearningabstractWe propose a new reinforcement learning algorithm derived from a regularized linear-programming formulation of optimal control in MDPs. The method is closely related to the classic Relative Entropy Policy Search (REPS) algorithm of Peters et al. (2010), with the key difference that our method introduces a Q-function that enables efficient exact model-free implementation. The main feature of our algorithm (called QREPS) is a convex loss function for policy evaluation that serves as a theoretically sound alternative to the widely used squared Bellman error. We provide a practical saddle-point optimization method for minimizing this loss function and provide an error-propagation analysis that relates the quality of the individual updates to the performance of the output policy. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on a range of benchmark problems. Joan Bas-Serrano, Sebastian Curi, Andreas Krause 0001, Gergely Neu |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2021 | Risk-Averse Offline Reinforcement Learning
Núria Armengol Urpi, Sebastian Curi, Andreas Krause 0001 |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2021 | Combining Pessimism with Optimism for Robust and Efficient Model-Based Deep Reinforcement LearningabstractIn real-world tasks, reinforcement learning (RL) agents frequently encounter situations that are not present during training time. To ensure reliable performance, the RL agents need to exhibit robustness to such worst-case situations. The robust-RL framework addresses this challenge via a minimax optimization between an agent and an adversary. Previous robust RL algorithms are either sample inefficient, lack robustness guarantees, or do not scale to large problems. We propose the Robust Hallucinated Upper-Confidence RL (RH-UCRL) algorithm to provably solve this problem while attaining near-optimal sample complexity guarantees. RH-UCRL is a model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) algorithm that effectively distinguishes between epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty and efficiently explores both the agent and the adversary decision spaces during policy learning. We scale RH-UCRL to complex tasks via neural networks ensemble models as well as neural network policies. Experimentally we demonstrate that RH-UCRL outperforms other robust deep RL algorithms in a variety of adversarial environments. Sebastian Curi, Ilija Bogunovic, Andreas Krause 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | Efficient Model-Based Reinforcement Learning through Optimistic Policy Search and PlanningabstractModel-based reinforcement learning algorithms with probabilistic dynamical models are amongst the most data-efficient learning methods. This is often attributed to their ability to distinguish between epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty. However, while most algorithms distinguish these two uncertainties for learning the model, they ignore it when optimizing the policy, which leads to greedy and insufficient exploration. At the same time, there are no practical solvers for optimistic exploration algorithms. In this paper, we propose a practical optimistic exploration algorithm (H-UCRL). H-UCRL reparameterizes the set of plausible models and hallucinates control directly on the epistemic uncertainty. By augmenting the input space with the hallucinated inputs, H-UCRL can be solved using standard greedy planners. Furthermore, we analyze H-UCRL and construct a general regret bound for well-calibrated models, which is provably sublinear in the case of Gaussian Process models. Based on this theoretical foundation, we show how optimistic exploration can be easily combined with state-of-the-art reinforcement learning algorithms and different probabilistic models. Our experiments demonstrate that optimistic exploration significantly speeds-up learning when there are penalties on actions, a setting that is notoriously difficult for existing model-based reinforcement learning algorithms. Sebastian Curi, Felix Berkenkamp, Andreas Krause 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Adaptive Sampling for Stochastic Risk-Averse LearningabstractIn high-stakes machine learning applications, it is crucial to not only perform well {\em on average}, but also when restricted to {\em difficult} examples. To address this, we consider the problem of training models in a risk-averse manner. We propose an adaptive sampling algorithm for stochastically optimizing the {\em Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR)} of a loss distribution, which measures its performance on the $\alpha$ fraction of most difficult examples. We use a distributionally robust formulation of the CVaR to phrase the problem as a zero-sum game between two players, and solve it efficiently using regret minimization. Our approach relies on sampling from structured Determinantal Point Processes (DPPs), which enables scaling it to large data sets. Finally, we empirically demonstrate its effectiveness on large-scale convex and non-convex learning tasks. Sebastian Curi, Kfir Y. Levy, Stefanie Jegelka, Andreas Krause 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | Online Variance Reduction with MixturesabstractAdaptive importance sampling for stochastic optimization is a promising approach that offers improved convergence through variance reduction. In this work, we propose a new framework for variance reduction that enables the use of mixtures over predefined sampling distributions, which can naturally encode prior knowledge about the data. While these sampling distributions are fixed, the mixture weights are adapted during the optimization process. We propose VRM, a novel and efficient adaptive scheme that asymptotically recovers the best mixture weights in hindsight and can also accommodate sampling distributions over sets of points. We empirically demonstrate the versatility of VRM in a range of applications. Zalan Borsos, Sebastian Curi, Kfir Y. Levy, Andreas Krause 0001 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2019 | Safe Contextual Bayesian Optimization for Sustainable Room Temperature PID Control TuningabstractWe tune one of the most common heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) control loops, namely the temperature control of a room. For economical and environmental reasons, it is of prime importance to optimize the performance of this system. Buildings account from 20 to 40 % of a country energy consumption, and almost 50 % of it comes from HVAC systems. Scenario projections predict a 30 % decrease in heating consumption by 2050 due to efficiency increase. Advanced control techniques can improve performance; however, the proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control is typically used due to its simplicity and overall performance. We use Safe Contextual Bayesian Optimization to optimize the PID parameters without human intervention. We reduce costs by 32 % compared to the current PID controller setting while assuring safety and comfort to people in the room. The results of this work have an immediate impact on the room control loop performances and its related commissioning costs. Furthermore, this successful attempt paves the way for further use at different levels of HVAC systems, with promising energy, operational, and commissioning costs savings, and it is a practical demonstration of the positive effects that Artificial Intelligence can have on environmental sustainability. Marcello Fiducioso, Sebastian Curi, Benedikt Schumacher, Markus Gwerder, Andreas Krause 0001 |
IJCAI | 2 |