Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Constantin Pape
dblp:213/4097
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-6562-7187ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 7 · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 84% Graph learning · 13% Representation and self-supervised learning · 4% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 71% Algorithms and data structures · 29% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Image and video processing · 73% Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 27% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
instance segmentation |
1.6 | 3 | 2022 | Sparse Object-level Supervision for Instance Segmentation with Pixel Embeddings · CVPR 2022 GASP, a generalized framework for agglomerative clustering of signed graphs and its application to Instance Segmentation · CVPR 2022 The Semantic Mutex Watershed for Efficient Bottom-Up Semantic Instance Segmentation · ECCV (6) 2020 |
Image and video processing
image segmentation |
1.4 | 2 | 2025 | Tiling Artifacts and Trade-Offs of Feature Normalization in the Segmentation of Large Biological Images · ICCV 2025 The Mutex Watershed and its Objective: Efficient, Parameter-Free Graph Partitioning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph clustering
signed graph clustering |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GASP, a generalized framework for agglomerative clustering of signed graphs and its application to Instance Segmentation · CVPR 2022 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › semantic segmentation
weakly supervised semantic segmentation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Sparse Object-level Supervision for Instance Segmentation with Pixel Embeddings · CVPR 2022 |
Algorithms and data structures › clustering › hierarchical clustering
agglomerative clustering |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GASP, a generalized framework for agglomerative clustering of signed graphs and its application to Instance Segmentation · CVPR 2022 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph clustering |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | GASP, a generalized framework for agglomerative clustering of signed graphs and its application to Instance Segmentation · CVPR 2022 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
graph partitioning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The Mutex Watershed and its Objective: Efficient, Parameter-Free Graph Partitioning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph clustering
correlation clustering |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The Mutex Watershed and its Objective: Efficient, Parameter-Free Graph Partitioning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph partitioning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The Mutex Watershed and its Objective: Efficient, Parameter-Free Graph Partitioning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › instance segmentation
semantic instance segmentation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | The Semantic Mutex Watershed for Efficient Bottom-Up Semantic Instance Segmentation · ECCV (6) 2020 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | The Mutex Watershed: Efficient, Parameter-Free Image Partitioning · ECCV (4) 2018 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
self-supervised consistency learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Sparse Object-level Supervision for Instance Segmentation with Pixel Embeddings · CVPR 2022 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph algorithms |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | The Semantic Mutex Watershed for Efficient Bottom-Up Semantic Instance Segmentation · ECCV (6) 2020 |
Algorithms and data structures › signal processing algorithms
watershed algorithm |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | The Semantic Mutex Watershed for Efficient Bottom-Up Semantic Instance Segmentation · ECCV (6) 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
feature normalization · 1.7mutex watershed · 1.2convolutional neural network · 1.1agglomerative clustering · 1.1watershed · 1.0multicut · 1.0graph partitioning · 0.9pixel embedding · 0.6contrastive learning · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | MedicoSAM: Robust Improvement of SAM for Medical ImagingabstractMedical image segmentation is an important analysis task in clinical practice and research. Deep learning has massively advanced the field, but current approaches are mostly based on models trained for a specific task. Training such models or adapting them to a new condition is costly due to the need for labeled data. The emergence of vision foundation models, especially Segment Anything Model (SAM), offers a path to universal segmentation for medical images, overcoming these issues. Here, we study how to improve SAM for medical images by comparing different finetuning strategies on a large and diverse dataset. We evaluate the finetuned models on a wide range of interactive and automatic semantic segmentation tasks. We find that performance clearly improves given the correct choice of finetuning strategies. This improvement is especially pronounced for interactive segmentation. Semantic segmentation also benefits, but the advantage over traditional segmentation approaches is inconsistent. Our best model, MedicoSAM, is publicly available. We show that it is compatible with existing tools for data annotation and believe that it will be of great practical value. Anwai Archit, Luca Freckmann, Constantin Pape |
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging | 3 |
| 2025 | Tiling Artifacts and Trade-Offs of Feature Normalization in the Segmentation of Large Biological Images
Elena Buglakova, Anwai Archit, Edoardo D'Imprima, Julia Mahamid, Constantin Pape, Anna Kreshuk |
ICCV | 5 |
| 2023 | Current Progress and Challenges in Large-Scale 3D Mitochondria Instance SegmentationabstractIn this paper, we present the results of the MitoEM challenge on mitochondria 3D instance segmentation from electron microscopy images, organized in conjunction with the IEEE-ISBI 2021 conference. Our benchmark dataset consists of two large-scale 3D volumes, one from human and one from rat cortex tissue, which are 1,986 times larger than previously used datasets. At the time of paper submission, 257 participants had registered for the challenge, 14 teams had submitted their results, and six teams participated in the challenge workshop. Here, we present eight top-performing approaches from the challenge participants, along with our own baseline strategies. Posterior to the challenge, annotation errors in the ground truth were corrected without altering the final ranking. Additionally, we present a retrospective evaluation of the scoring system which revealed that: 1) challenge metric was permissive with the false positive predictions; and 2) size-based grouping of instances did not correctly categorize mitochondria of interest. Thus, we propose a new scoring system that better reflects the correctness of the segmentation results. Although several of the top methods are compared favorably to our own baselines, substantial errors remain unsolved for mitochondria with challenging morphologies. Thus, the challenge remains open for submission and automatic evaluation, with all volumes available for download. Daniel Franco-Barranco, Zudi Lin, Won-Dong Jang, Xueying Wang 0002, Qijia Shen, Yutian Fan, Mingxing Li 0003, Chang Chen 0004, Zhiwei Xiong, Rui Xin 0003, Huai Chen, Zhili Li, Jie Zhao 0020, Xuejin Chen, Constantin Pape, Ryan Conrad, Luke Nightingale, Joost de Folter, Martin L. Jones, Dorsa Ziaei, Stephan Huschauer, Ignacio Arganda-Carreras, Hanspeter Pfister, Donglai Wei 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging | 17 |
| 2022 | GASP, a generalized framework for agglomerative clustering of signed graphs and its application to Instance SegmentationabstractWe propose a theoretical framework that generalizes simple and fast algorithms for hierarchical agglomerative clustering to weighted graphs with both attractive and repulsive interactions between the nodes. This framework defines GASP, a Generalized Algorithm for Signed graph Partitioning11Code available at: https://github.com/abailoni/GASP, and allows us to explore many combinations of different linkage criteria and cannotlink constraints. We prove the equivalence of existing clustering methods to some of those combinations and introduce new algorithms for combinations that have not been studied before. We study both theoretical and empirical properties of these combinations and prove that some of these define an ultrametric on the graph. We conduct a systematic comparison of various instantiations of GASP on a large variety of both synthetic and existing signed clustering problems, in terms of accuracy but also efficiency and robustness to noise. Lastly, we show that some of the algorithms included in our framework, when combined with the predictions from a CNN model, result in a simple bottom-up instance segmentation pipeline. Going all the way from pixels to final segments with a simple procedure, we achieve state-of-the-art accuracy on the CREMI 2016 EM segmentation benchmark without requiring domain-specific superpixels. Alberto Bailoni, Constantin Pape, Nathan Hütsch, Steffen Wolf 0001, Thorsten Beier, Anna Kreshuk, Fred A. Hamprecht |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2022 | Sparse Object-level Supervision for Instance Segmentation with Pixel EmbeddingsabstractMost state-of-the-art instance segmentation methods have to be trained on densely annotated images. While difficult in general, this requirement is especially daunting for biomedical images, where domain expertise is often required for annotation and no large public data collections are available for pre-training. We propose to address the dense annotation bottleneck by introducing a proposal-free segmentation approach based on non-spatial embeddings, which exploits the structure of the learned embedding space to extract individual instances in a differentiable way. The segmentation loss can then be applied directly to instances and the overall pipeline can be trained in a fully-or weakly supervised manner. We consider the challenging case of positive-unlabeled supervision, where a novel self-supervised consistency loss is introduced for the unlabeled parts of the training data. We evaluate the proposed method on 2D and 3D segmentation problems in different microscopy modalities as well as on the Cityscapes and CVPPP instance segmentation benchmarks, achieving state-of-the-art results on the latter. Adrian Wolny, Qin Yu 0005, Constantin Pape, Anna Kreshuk |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2021 | The Mutex Watershed and its Objective: Efficient, Parameter-Free Graph PartitioningabstractImage partitioning, or segmentation without semantics, is the task of decomposing an image into distinct segments, or equivalently to detect closed contours. Most prior work either requires seeds, one per segment; or a threshold; or formulates the task as multicut / correlation clustering, an NP-hard problem. Here, we propose an efficient algorithm for graph partitioning, the "Mutex Watershed". Unlike seeded watershed, the algorithm can accommodate not only attractive but also repulsive cues, allowing it to find a previously unspecified number of segments without the need for explicit seeds or a tunable threshold. We also prove that this simple algorithm solves to global optimality an objective function that is intimately related to the multicut / correlation clustering integer linear programming formulation. The algorithm is deterministic, very simple to implement, and has empirically linearithmic complexity. When presented with short-range attractive and long-range repulsive cues from a deep neural network, the Mutex Watershed gives the best results currently known for the competitive ISBI 2012 EM segmentation benchmark. Steffen Wolf 0001, Alberto Bailoni, Constantin Pape, Nasim Rahaman, Anna Kreshuk, Ullrich Köthe, Fred A. Hamprecht |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 3 |
| 2020 | The Semantic Mutex Watershed for Efficient Bottom-Up Semantic Instance Segmentation
Steffen Wolf 0001, Constantin Pape, Alberto Bailoni, Anna Kreshuk, Fred A. Hamprecht |
ECCV (6) | 3 |
| 2019 | Synthetic Patches, Real Images: Screening for Centrosome Aberrations in EM Images of Human Cancer Cells
Artem Lukoyanov, Isabella Haberbosch, Constantin Pape, Alwin Krämer, Yannick Schwab, Anna Kreshuk |
MICCAI (1) | 3 |
| 2018 | The Mutex Watershed: Efficient, Parameter-Free Image Partitioning
Steffen Wolf 0001, Constantin Pape, Alberto Bailoni, Nasim Rahaman, Anna Kreshuk, Ullrich Köthe, Fred A. Hamprecht |
ECCV (4) | 2 |
| 2018 | Synaptic Cleft Segmentation in Non-isotropic Volume Electron Microscopy of the Complete Drosophila Brain
Larissa Heinrich, Jan Funke, Constantin Pape, Juan Nunez-Iglesias, Stephan Saalfeld |
MICCAI (2) | 3 |