Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Homayoun Hamedmoghadam
dblp:213/7352
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-3467-724XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 53% Graph learning · 47% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Learning Network Dismantling Without Handcrafted Inputs · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
message passing |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Learning Network Dismantling Without Handcrafted Inputs · AAAI 2026 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › network analysis › network reliability
critical node identification |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Learning Network Dismantling Without Handcrafted Inputs · AAAI 2026 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › network analysis
network dismantling |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Learning Network Dismantling Without Handcrafted Inputs · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning for control |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Reinforcement Learning with Adaptive Regularization for Safe Control of Critical Systems · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › safe reinforcement learning
safe exploration |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Reinforcement Learning with Adaptive Regularization for Safe Control of Critical Systems · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safe reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Reinforcement Learning with Adaptive Regularization for Safe Control of Critical Systems · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
message iteration · 2.0attention mechanism · 2.0policy regularization · 0.8adaptive regularization · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Learning Network Dismantling Without Handcrafted InputsabstractThe application of message-passing Graph Neural Networks has been a breakthrough for important network science problems. However, the competitive performance often relies on using handcrafted structural features as inputs, which increases computational cost and introduces bias into the otherwise purely data-driven network representations. Here, we eliminate the need for handcrafted features by introducing an attention mechanism and utilizing message-iteration profiles, in addition to an effective algorithmic approach to generate a structurally diverse training set of small synthetic networks. Thereby, we build an expressive message-passing framework and use it to efficiently solve the NP-hard problem of Network Dismantling, virtually equivalent to vital node identification, with significant real-world applications. Trained solely on diversified synthetic networks, our proposed model—MIND: Message Iteration Network Dismantler—generalizes to large, unseen real networks with millions of nodes, outperforming state-of-the-art network dismantling methods. Increased efficiency and generalizability of the proposed model can be leveraged beyond dismantling in a range of complex network problems. Haozhe Tian, Pietro Ferraro, Robert Shorten, Mahdi Jalili, Homayoun Hamedmoghadam |
AAAI | 5 |
| 2025 | Tree Proof-of-Position AlgorithmsabstractA growing issue across multiple fields involves verifying that an individual or object is truly in the location it claims to be and, despite the significance of this problem, the scientific community has not extensively explored how to provide proof for such claims. Accordingly, this article presents a novel class of proof-of-position algorithms: tree-proof-of-position (T-PoP). These algorithms are decentralized, collaborative and can be computed in a privacy preserving manner, such that agents do not need to reveal their position publicly. We make no assumptions of honest behavior in the system, and consider varying ways in which agents may misbehave. T-PoP is therefore resilient to adversarial scenarios, which makes it suitable for a wide class of applications, namely those where trust in a centralized infrastructure may not be assumed, or high security risk scenarios. Our algorithm has a worst case quadratic runtime, making it suitable for hardware constrained IoT applications. We also provide a mathematical model that summarizes T-PoP’s performance for varying operating conditions. Using a large number of agent-based simulations, we verify the agreement between TPoP’s performance and our mathematical predictions. T-PoP can achieve high levels of reliability and security by tuning its operating conditions, both in high and low density environments. Finally, we also present a mathematical model to probabilistically detect platooning attacks. Aida Manzano Kharman, Pietro Ferraro, Homayoun Hamedmoghadam, Robert Shorten |
IEEE Internet Things J. | 3 |
| 2024 | Reinforcement Learning with Adaptive Regularization for Safe Control of Critical SystemsabstractReinforcement Learning (RL) is a powerful method for controlling dynamic systems, but its learning mechanism can lead to unpredictable actions that undermine the safety of critical systems. Here, we propose RL with Adaptive Regularization (RL-AR), an algorithm that enables safe RL exploration by combining the RL policy with a policy regularizer that hard-codes the safety constraints. RL-AR performs policy combination via a "focus module," which determines the appropriate combination depending on the state—relying more on the safe policy regularizer for less-exploited states while allowing unbiased convergence for well-exploited states. In a series of critical control applications, we demonstrate that RL-AR not only ensures safety during training but also achieves a return competitive with the standards of model-free RL that disregards safety. Haozhe Tian, Homayoun Hamedmoghadam, Robert Shorten, Pietro Ferraro |
NeurIPS | 2 |