Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Homayoun Hamedmoghadam

dblp:213/7352 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-3467-724XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 53% Graph learning · 47%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
1.012026
Learning Network Dismantling Without Handcrafted Inputs · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
message passing
1.012026
Learning Network Dismantling Without Handcrafted Inputs · AAAI 2026
Graph algorithms and graph theory › network analysis › network reliability
critical node identification
1.012026
Learning Network Dismantling Without Handcrafted Inputs · AAAI 2026
Graph algorithms and graph theory › network analysis
network dismantling
1.012026
Learning Network Dismantling Without Handcrafted Inputs · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning for control
0.812024
Reinforcement Learning with Adaptive Regularization for Safe Control of Critical Systems · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › safe reinforcement learning
safe exploration
0.812024
Reinforcement Learning with Adaptive Regularization for Safe Control of Critical Systems · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safe reinforcement learning
0.812024
Reinforcement Learning with Adaptive Regularization for Safe Control of Critical Systems · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

message iteration · 2.0attention mechanism · 2.0policy regularization · 0.8adaptive regularization · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Learning Network Dismantling Without Handcrafted Inputs
abstract
The application of message-passing Graph Neural Networks has been a breakthrough for important network science problems. However, the competitive performance often relies on using handcrafted structural features as inputs, which increases computational cost and introduces bias into the otherwise purely data-driven network representations. Here, we eliminate the need for handcrafted features by introducing an attention mechanism and utilizing message-iteration profiles, in addition to an effective algorithmic approach to generate a structurally diverse training set of small synthetic networks. Thereby, we build an expressive message-passing framework and use it to efficiently solve the NP-hard problem of Network Dismantling, virtually equivalent to vital node identification, with significant real-world applications. Trained solely on diversified synthetic networks, our proposed model—MIND: Message Iteration Network Dismantler—generalizes to large, unseen real networks with millions of nodes, outperforming state-of-the-art network dismantling methods. Increased efficiency and generalizability of the proposed model can be leveraged beyond dismantling in a range of complex network problems.
Haozhe Tian, Pietro Ferraro, Robert Shorten, Mahdi Jalili, Homayoun Hamedmoghadam
AAAI5
2025 Tree Proof-of-Position Algorithms
abstract
A growing issue across multiple fields involves verifying that an individual or object is truly in the location it claims to be and, despite the significance of this problem, the scientific community has not extensively explored how to provide proof for such claims. Accordingly, this article presents a novel class of proof-of-position algorithms: tree-proof-of-position (T-PoP). These algorithms are decentralized, collaborative and can be computed in a privacy preserving manner, such that agents do not need to reveal their position publicly. We make no assumptions of honest behavior in the system, and consider varying ways in which agents may misbehave. T-PoP is therefore resilient to adversarial scenarios, which makes it suitable for a wide class of applications, namely those where trust in a centralized infrastructure may not be assumed, or high security risk scenarios. Our algorithm has a worst case quadratic runtime, making it suitable for hardware constrained IoT applications. We also provide a mathematical model that summarizes T-PoP’s performance for varying operating conditions. Using a large number of agent-based simulations, we verify the agreement between TPoP’s performance and our mathematical predictions. T-PoP can achieve high levels of reliability and security by tuning its operating conditions, both in high and low density environments. Finally, we also present a mathematical model to probabilistically detect platooning attacks.
Aida Manzano Kharman, Pietro Ferraro, Homayoun Hamedmoghadam, Robert Shorten
IEEE Internet Things J.3
2024 Reinforcement Learning with Adaptive Regularization for Safe Control of Critical Systems
abstract
Reinforcement Learning (RL) is a powerful method for controlling dynamic systems, but its learning mechanism can lead to unpredictable actions that undermine the safety of critical systems. Here, we propose RL with Adaptive Regularization (RL-AR), an algorithm that enables safe RL exploration by combining the RL policy with a policy regularizer that hard-codes the safety constraints. RL-AR performs policy combination via a "focus module," which determines the appropriate combination depending on the state—relying more on the safe policy regularizer for less-exploited states while allowing unbiased convergence for well-exploited states. In a series of critical control applications, we demonstrate that RL-AR not only ensures safety during training but also achieves a return competitive with the standards of model-free RL that disregards safety.
Haozhe Tian, Homayoun Hamedmoghadam, Robert Shorten, Pietro Ferraro
NeurIPS2