Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alistair Muldal
dblp:213/7589
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 44% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 16% Vision and language · 16% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
cross-task transfer |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A data-driven approach for learning to control computers · ICML 2022 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
mobile manipulation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Intra-agent speech permits zero-shot task acquisition · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization › policy gradient
deterministic policy gradient |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Distributed Distributional Deterministic Policy Gradients · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › large-scale reinforcement learning
distributed reinforcement learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Distributed Distributional Deterministic Policy Gradients · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learning Awareness Models · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › autonomous agents
embodied agent |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Intra-agent speech permits zero-shot task acquisition · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning › state representation learning
predictive state representation |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Learning Awareness Models · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 1.5imitation learning · 1.1semi-supervised learning · 0.6intra-agent speech · 0.6behavioral priors · 0.6behavioral prior · 0.6predictive modeling · 0.3distributional value function · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | A data-driven approach for learning to control computersabstractIt would be useful for machines to use computers as humans do so that they can aid us in everyday tasks. This is a setting in which there is also the potential to leverage large-scale expert demonstrations and human judgements of interactive behaviour, which are two ingredients that have driven much recent success in AI. Here we investigate the setting of computer control using keyboard and mouse, with goals specified via natural language. Instead of focusing on hand-designed curricula and specialized action spaces, we focus on developing a scalable method centered on reinforcement learning combined with behavioural priors informed by actual human-computer interactions. We achieve state-of-the-art and human-level mean performance across all tasks within the MiniWob++ benchmark, a challenging suite of computer control problems, and find strong evidence of cross-task transfer. These results demonstrate the usefulness of a unified human-agent interface when training machines to use computers. Altogether our results suggest a formula for achieving competency beyond MiniWob++ and towards controlling computers, in general, as a human would. Peter Conway Humphreys, David Raposo, Tobias Pohlen, Gregory Thornton, Rachita Chhaparia, Alistair Muldal, Josh Abramson, Petko Georgiev, Adam Santoro, Timothy P. Lillicrap |
ICML | 6 |
| 2022 | Intra-agent speech permits zero-shot task acquisitionabstractHuman language learners are exposed to a trickle of informative, context-sensitive language, but a flood of raw sensory data. Through both social language use and internal processes of rehearsal and practice, language learners are able to build high-level, semantic representations that explain their perceptions. Here, we take inspiration from such processes of "inner speech" in humans (Vygotsky, 1934) to better understand the role of intra-agent speech in embodied behavior. First, we formally pose intra-agent speech as a semi-supervised problem and develop two algorithms that enable visually grounded captioning with little labeled language data. We then experimentally compute scaling curves over different amounts of labeled data and compare the data efficiency against a supervised learning baseline. Finally, we incorporate intra-agent speech into an embodied, mobile manipulator agent operating in a 3D virtual world, and show that with as few as 150 additional image captions, intra-agent speech endows the agent with the ability to manipulate and answer questions about a new object without any related task-directed experience (zero-shot). Taken together, our experiments suggest that modelling intra-agent speech is effective in enabling embodied agents to learn new tasks efficiently and without direct interaction experience. Federico Carnevale, Petko Georgiev, Adam Santoro, Aurelia Guy, Alistair Muldal, Chia-Chun Hung, Josh Abramson, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Greg Wayne |
NeurIPS | 6 |
| 2018 | Learning Awareness Models
Brandon Amos, Laurent Dinh, Serkan Cabi, Thomas Rothörl, Sergio Gomez Colmenarejo, Alistair Muldal, Tom Erez, Yuval Tassa, Nando de Freitas, Misha Denil |
ICLR (Poster) | 6 |
| 2018 | Distributed Distributional Deterministic Policy Gradients
Gabriel Barth-Maron, Matt Hoffman 0001, David Budden, Will Dabney, Daniel Horgan, Dhruva TB, Alistair Muldal, Nicolas Heess, Timothy P. Lillicrap |
ICLR (Poster) | 7 |