Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Matthew Sutton

dblp:213/7862 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 97% Learning theory · 3%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference
1.422025
The Polynomial Stein Discrepancy for Assessing Moment Convergence · ICML 2025
Continuously Tempered PDMP samplers · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › model criticism
sample quality assessment
0.912025
The Polynomial Stein Discrepancy for Assessing Moment Convergence · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › divergence measure
stein discrepancy
0.912025
The Polynomial Stein Discrepancy for Assessing Moment Convergence · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo
0.612022
Continuously Tempered PDMP samplers · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling › posterior sampling
multimodal posterior sampling
0.612022
Continuously Tempered PDMP samplers · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
piecewise deterministic markov process sampler
0.612022
Continuously Tempered PDMP samplers · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
tempering
0.612022
Continuously Tempered PDMP samplers · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional statistics
heavy-tailed distribution
0.212022
Continuously Tempered PDMP samplers · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic gradient langevin dynamics · 0.9goodness-of-fit test · 0.9zig-zag sampler · 0.6tempering · 0.6PDMP simulation · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 The Polynomial Stein Discrepancy for Assessing Moment Convergence
abstract
We propose a novel method for measuring the discrepancy between a set of samples and a desired posterior distribution for Bayesian inference. Classical methods for assessing sample quality like the effective sample size are not appropriate for scalable Bayesian sampling algorithms, such as stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics, that are asymptotically biased. Instead, the gold standard is to use the kernel Stein Discrepancy (KSD), which is itself not scalable given its quadratic cost in the number of samples. The KSD and its faster extensions also typically suffer from the curse-of-dimensionality and can require extensive tuning. To address these limitations, we develop the polynomial Stein discrepancy (PSD) and an associated goodness-of-fit test. While the new test is not fully convergence-determining, we prove that it detects differences in the first $r$ moments for Gaussian targets. We empirically show that the test has higher power than its competitors in several examples, and at a lower computational cost. Finally, we demonstrate that the PSD can assist practitioners to select hyper-parameters of Bayesian sampling algorithms more efficiently than competitors.
Narayan Srinivasan, Matthew Sutton, Christopher C. Drovandi, Leah F. South
ICML2
2023 Transport Reversible Jump Proposals
abstract
Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo (RJMCMC) proposals that achieve reasonable acceptance rates and mixing are notoriously difficult to design in most applications. Inspired by recent advances in deep neural network-based normalizing flows and density estimation, we demonstrate an approach to enhance the efficiency of RJMCMC sampling by performing transdimensional jumps involving reference distributions. In contrast to other RJMCMC proposals, the proposed method is the first to apply a non-linear transport-based approach to construct efficient proposals between models with complicated dependency structures. It is shown that, in the setting where exact transports are used, our RJMCMC proposals have the desirable property that the acceptance probability depends only on the model probabilities. Numerical experiments demonstrate the efficacy of the approach.
Laurence Davies, Robert Salomone, Matthew Sutton, Christopher C. Drovandi
AISTATS3
2022 Continuously Tempered PDMP samplers
abstract
New sampling algorithms based on simulating continuous-time stochastic processes called piece-wise deterministic Markov processes (PDMPs) have shown considerable promise. However, these methods can struggle to sample from multi-modal or heavy-tailed distributions. We show how tempering ideas can improve the mixing of PDMPs in such cases. We introduce an extended distribution defined over the state of the posterior distribution and an inverse temperature, which interpolates between a tractable distribution when the inverse temperature is 0 and the posterior when the inverse temperature is 1. The marginal distribution of the inverse temperature is a mixture of a continuous distribution on $[0,1)$ and a point mass at 1: which means that we obtain samples when the inverse temperature is 1, and these are draws from the posterior, but sampling algorithms will also explore distributions at lower temperatures which will improve mixing. We show how PDMPs, and particularly the Zig-Zag sampler, can be implemented to sample from such an extended distribution. The resulting algorithm is easy to implement and we show empirically that it can outperform existing PDMP-based samplers on challenging multimodal posteriors.
Matthew Sutton, Robert Salomone, Augustin Chevallier, Paul Fearnhead
NeurIPS1