EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shweta Bhardwaj
dblp:213/7873
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-9665-9472ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 37% Vision and language · 17% Generative modeling · 11% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
1.1 | 2 | 2025 | ColorBench: Can VLMs See and Understand the Colorful World? A Comprehensive Benchmark for Color Perception, Reasoning, and Robustness · NeurIPS 2025 Identifying Interpretable Subspaces in Image Representations · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
curriculum learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diffusion Curriculum: Synthetic-to-Real Data Curriculum via Image-Guided Diffusion · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diffusion Curriculum: Synthetic-to-Real Data Curriculum via Image-Guided Diffusion · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ColorBench: Can VLMs See and Understand the Colorful World? A Comprehensive Benchmark for Color Perception, Reasoning, and Robustness · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
concept-based explanation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Identifying Interpretable Subspaces in Image Representations · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
feature interpretation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Identifying Interpretable Subspaces in Image Representations · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Identifying Interpretable Subspaces in Image Representations · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
representation space analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Identifying Interpretable Subspaces in Image Representations · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Efficient Video Classification Using Fewer Frames · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Efficient Video Classification Using Fewer Frames · CVPR 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
synthetic data |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Diffusion Curriculum: Synthetic-to-Real Data Curriculum via Image-Guided Diffusion · ICCV 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
image captioning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Identifying Interpretable Subspaces in Image Representations · ICML 2023 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Efficient Video Classification Using Fewer Frames · CVPR 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
diffusion model · 0.9curriculum learning · 0.9chain-of-thought · 0.9benchmark evaluation · 0.9vision-language model · 0.7linear transformation · 0.7contrastive interpretation · 0.7teacher-student training · 0.4knowledge distillation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Diffusion Curriculum: Synthetic-to-Real Data Curriculum via Image-Guided Diffusion
Yijun Liang, Shweta Bhardwaj, Tianyi Zhou 0001 |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2025 | ColorBench: Can VLMs See and Understand the Colorful World? A Comprehensive Benchmark for Color Perception, Reasoning, and RobustnessabstractColor plays an important role in human perception and usually provides critical clues in visual reasoning. However, it is unclear whether and how vision-language models (VLMs) can perceive, understand, and leverage color as humans.This paper introduces ColorBench, an innovative benchmark meticulously crafted to assess the capabilities of VLMs in color understanding, including color perception, reasoning, and robustness. By curating a suite of diverse test scenarios, with grounding in real applications, ColorBench evaluates how these models perceive colors, infer meanings from color-based cues, and maintain consistent performance under varying color transformations. Through an extensive evaluation of 32 VLMs with varying language models and vision encoders, our paper reveals some undiscovered findings: (i) The scaling law (larger models are better) still holds on ColorBench, while the language model plays a more important role than the vision encoder. (ii) However, the performance gaps across models are relatively small, indicating that color understanding has been largely neglected by existing VLMs. (iii) CoT reasoning improves color understanding accuracies and robustness, though they are vision-centric tasks. (iv) Color clues are indeed leveraged by VLMs on ColorBench but they can also mislead models in some tasks.These findings highlight the critical limitations of current VLMs and underscore the need to enhance color comprehension. Our ColorBench can serve as a foundational tool for advancing the study of human-level color understanding of multimodal AI. Yijun Liang, Ming Li 0010, Chenrui Fan, Kwesi Cobbina, Shweta Bhardwaj, Jiuhai Chen, Fuxiao Liu, Tianyi Zhou 0001 |
NeurIPS | 7 |
| 2023 | Identifying Interpretable Subspaces in Image RepresentationsabstractWe propose Automatic Feature Explanation using Contrasting Concepts (FALCON), an interpretability framework to explain features of image representations. For a target feature, FALCON captions its highly activating cropped images using a large captioning dataset (like LAION-400m) and a pre-trained vision-language model like CLIP. Each word among the captions is scored and ranked leading to a small number of shared, human-understandable concepts that closely describe the target feature. FALCON also applies contrastive interpretation using lowly activating (counterfactual) images, to eliminate spurious concepts. Although many existing approaches interpret features independently, we observe in state-of-the-art self-supervised and supervised models, that less than 20% of the representation space can be explained by individual features. We show that features in larger spaces become more interpretable when studied in groups and can be explained with high-order scoring concepts through FALCON. We discuss how extracted concepts can be used to explain and debug failures in downstream tasks. Finally, we present a technique to transfer concepts from one (explainable) representation space to another unseen representation space by learning a simple linear transformation. Neha Mukund Kalibhat, Shweta Bhardwaj, C. Bayan Bruss, Hamed Firooz, Maziar Sanjabi, Soheil Feizi |
ICML | 2 |
| 2019 | Efficient Video Classification Using Fewer FramesabstractRecently, there has been a lot of interest in building compact models for video classification which have a small memory footprint (<1 GB). While these models are compact, they typically operate by repeated application of a small weight matrix to all the frames in a video. For example, recurrent neural network based methods compute a hidden state for every frame of the video using a recurrent weight matrix. Similarly, cluster-and-aggregate based methods such as NetVLAD have a learnable clustering matrix which is used to assign soft-clusters to every frame in the video. Since these models look at every frame in the video, the number of floating point operations (FLOPs) is still large even though the memory footprint is small. In this work, we focus on building compute-efficient video classification models which process fewer frames and hence have less number of FLOPs. Similar to memory efficient models, we use the idea of distillation albeit in a different setting. Specifically, in our case, a compute-heavy teacher which looks at all the frames in the video is used to train a compute-efficient student which looks at only a small fraction of frames in the video. This is in contrast to a typical memory efficient Teacher-Student setting, wherein both the teacher and the student look at all the frames in the video but the student has fewer parameters. Our work thus complements the research on memory efficient video classification. We do an extensive evaluation with three types of models for video classification, viz., (i) recurrent models (ii) cluster-and-aggregate models and (iii) memory-efficient cluster-and-aggregate models and show that in each of these cases, a see-it-all teacher can be used to train a compute efficient see-very-little student. Overall, we show that the proposed student network can reduce the inference time by 30% and the number of FLOPs by approximately 90% with a negligent drop in the performance. Shweta Bhardwaj, Mukundhan Srinivasan, Mitesh M. Khapra |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2019 | Studying the plasticity in deep convolutional neural networks using random pruning
Deepak Mittal, Shweta Bhardwaj, Mitesh M. Khapra, Balaraman Ravindran |
Mach. Vis. Appl. | 2 |
| 2018 | Recovering from Random Pruning: On the Plasticity of Deep Convolutional Neural NetworksabstractRecently there has been a lot of work on pruning filters from deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with the intention of reducing computations. The key idea is to rank the filters based on a certain criterion (say, l1-norm, average percentage of zeros, etc) and retain only the top ranked filters. Once the low scoring filters are pruned away the remainder of the network is fine tuned and is shown to give performance comparable to the original unpruned network. In this work, we report experiments which suggest that the comparable performance of the pruned network is not due to the specific criterion chosen but due to the inherent plasticity of deep neural networks which allows them to recover from the loss of pruned filters once the rest of the filters are fine-tuned. Specifically, we show counter-intuitive results wherein by randomly pruning 25-50% filters from deep CNNs we are able to obtain the same performance as obtained by using state of the art pruning methods. We empirically validate our claims by doing an exhaustive evaluation with VGG-16 and ResNet-50. Further, we also evaluate a real world scenario where a CNN trained on all 1000 ImageNet classes needs to be tested on only a small set of classes at test time (say, only animals). We create a new benchmark dataset from ImageNet to evaluate such class specific pruning and show that even here a random pruning strategy gives close to state of the art performance. Lastly, unlike existing approaches which mainly focus on the task of image classification, in this work we also report results on object detection. We show that using a simple random pruning strategy we can achieve significant speed up in object detection (74% improvement in fps) while retaining the same accuracy as that of the original Faster RCNN model. Deepak Mittal, Shweta Bhardwaj, Mitesh M. Khapra, Balaraman Ravindran |
WACV | 2 |