Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matan Eyal
dblp:213/8040
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Language models and text generation · 23% Trustworthy machine learning · 23% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 13% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multilingual language models |
1.8 | 2 | 2026 | Location Not Found: Exposing Implicit Local and Global Biases in Multilingual LLMs · ACL (1) 2026 The Hidden Space of Transformer Language Adapters · ACL (1) 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias in language models |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Location Not Found: Exposing Implicit Local and Global Biases in Multilingual LLMs · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Location Not Found: Exposing Implicit Local and Global Biases in Multilingual LLMs · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Location Not Found: Exposing Implicit Local and Global Biases in Multilingual LLMs · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › knowledge-intensive question answering
closed-book question answering |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations? · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
cross-lingual transfer |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | The Hidden Space of Transformer Language Adapters · ACL (1) 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations? · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
hallucination |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations? · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | The Hidden Space of Transformer Language Adapters · ACL (1) 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
sense embeddings |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Large Scale Substitution-based Word Sense Induction · ACL (1) 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
word embedding |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Large Scale Substitution-based Word Sense Induction · ACL (1) 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › lexical semantics
word sense induction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Large Scale Substitution-based Word Sense Induction · ACL (1) 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › image registration
diffeomorphic registration |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Diffeomorphic Temporal Alignment Nets · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
invertible transformation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Diffeomorphic Temporal Alignment Nets · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series signal processing
time-series alignment |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Diffeomorphic Temporal Alignment Nets · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
time warping |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Diffeomorphic Temporal Alignment Nets · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
representation space analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | The Hidden Space of Transformer Language Adapters · ACL (1) 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supervised fine-tuning · 0.8layer-wise analysis · 0.8adapter modules · 0.8substitution-based induction · 0.6masked language model · 0.6temporal transformer · 0.4semi-supervised learning · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Location Not Found: Exposing Implicit Local and Global Biases in Multilingual LLMsabstractGuy Mor-Lan, Omer Goldman, Matan Eyal, Adi Mayrav Gilady, Sivan Eiger, Idan Szpektor, Avinatan Hassidim, Yossi Matias, Reut Tsarfaty. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Guy Mor, Omer Goldman, Matan Eyal, Adi Mayrav Gilady, Sivan Eiger, Idan Szpektor, Avinatan Hassidim, Yossi Matias, Reut Tsarfaty |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2024 | The Hidden Space of Transformer Language AdaptersabstractWe analyze the operation of transformer language adapters, which are small modules trained on top of a frozen language model to adapt its predictions to new target languages.We show that adapted predictions mostly evolve in the source language the model was trained on, while the target language becomes pronounced only in the very last layers of the model.Moreover, the adaptation process is gradual and distributed across layers, where it is possible to skip small groups of adapters without decreasing adaptation performance.Last, we show that adapters operate on top of the model's frozen representation space while largely preserving its structure, rather than on an "isolated" subspace.Our findings provide a deeper view into the adaptation process of language models to new languages, showcasing the constraints imposed on it by the underlying model and introduces practical implications to enhance its efficiency. 1 Jesujoba O. Alabi, Marius Mosbach, Matan Eyal, Dietrich Klakow, Mor Geva |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2024 | Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?abstractWhen large language models are aligned via supervised fine-tuning, they may encounter new factual information that was not acquired through pre-training.It is often conjectured that this can teach the model the behavior of hallucinating factually incorrect responses, as the model is trained to generate facts that are not grounded in its pre-existing knowledge.In this work, we study the impact of such exposure to new knowledge on the capability of the fine-tuned model to utilize its pre-existing knowledge.To this end, we design a controlled setup, focused on closedbook QA, where we vary the proportion of the fine-tuning examples that introduce new knowledge.We demonstrate that large language models struggle to acquire new factual knowledge through fine-tuning, as fine-tuning examples that introduce new knowledge are learned significantly slower than those consistent with the model's knowledge.However, we also find that as the examples with new knowledge are eventually learned, they linearly increase the model's tendency to hallucinate.Taken together, our results highlight the risk in introducing new factual knowledge through fine-tuning, and support the view that large language models mostly acquire factual knowledge through pre-training, whereas finetuning teaches them to use it more efficiently. Zorik Gekhman, Gal Yona, Roee Aharoni, Matan Eyal, Amir Feder, Roi Reichart, Jonathan Herzig |
EMNLP | 4 |
| 2022 | Large Scale Substitution-based Word Sense InductionabstractWe present a word-sense induction method based on pre-trained masked language models (MLMs), which can cheaply scale to large vocabularies and large corpora.The result is a corpus which is sense-tagged according to a corpus-derived sense inventory and where each sense is associated with indicative words.Evaluation on English Wikipedia that was sense-tagged using our method shows that both the induced senses, and the per-instance sense assignment, are of high quality even compared to WSD methods, such as Babelfy.Furthermore, by training a static word embeddings algorithm on the sense-tagged corpus, we obtain high-quality static senseful embeddings.These outperform existing senseful embeddings methods on the WiC dataset and on a new outlier detection dataset we developed.The data driven nature of the algorithm allows to induce corpora-specific senses, which may not appear in standard sense inventories, as we demonstrate using a case study on the scientific domain. Matan Eyal, Shoval Sadde, Hillel Taub-Tabib, Yoav Goldberg |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2021 | Bootstrapping Relation Extractors using Syntactic Search by ExamplesabstractThe advent of neural-networks in NLP brought with it substantial improvements in supervised relation extraction.However, obtaining a sufficient quantity of training data remains a key challenge.In this work we propose a process for bootstrapping training datasets which can be performed quickly by non-NLP-experts.We take advantage of search engines over syntactic-graphs (Such as Shlain et al. ( 2020)) which expose a friendly by-example syntax.We use these to obtain positive examples by searching for sentences that are syntactically similar to user input examples.We apply this technique to relations from TACRED and Do-cRED and show that the resulting models are competitive with models trained on manually annotated data and on data obtained from distant supervision.The models also outperform models trained using NLG data augmentation techniques.Extending the search-based approach with the NLG method further improves the results. Matan Eyal, Asaf Amrami, Hillel Taub-Tabib, Yoav Goldberg |
EACL | 1 |
| 2019 | Diffeomorphic Temporal Alignment NetsabstractTime-series analysis is confounded by nonlinear time warping of the data. Traditional methods for joint alignment do not generalize: after aligning a given signal ensemble, they lack a mechanism, that does not require solving a new optimization problem, to align previously-unseen signals. In the multi-class case, they must also first classify the test data before aligning it. Here we propose the Diffeomorphic Temporal alignment Net (DTAN), a learning-based method for time-series joint alignment. Via flexible temporal transformer layers, DTAN learns and applies an input-dependent nonlinear time warping to its input signal. Once learned, DTAN easily aligns previously-unseen signals by its inexpensive forward pass. In a single-class case, the method is unsupervised: the ground-truth alignments are unknown. In the multi-class case, it is semi-supervised in the sense that class labels (but not the ground-truth alignments) are used during learning; in test time, however, the class labels are unknown. As we show, DTAN not only outperforms existing joint-alignment methods in aligning training data but also generalizes well to test data. Our code is available at https://github.com/BGU-CS-VIL/dtan. Ron Shapira Weber, Matan Eyal, Nicki Skafte Detlefsen, Oren Shriki, Oren Freifeld |
NeurIPS | 2 |