Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Louis Filstroff

dblp:213/8279 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-7386-4745ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 76% Representation and self-supervised learning · 12% Information extraction and text analysis · 12%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › approximate bayesian inference
approximate bayesian computation
0.612022
Approximate Bayesian Computation with Domain Expert in the Loop · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › approximate bayesian inference
simulation-based inference
0.612022
Approximate Bayesian Computation with Domain Expert in the Loop · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
count data modeling
0.312018
Closed-form Marginal Likelihood in Gamma-Poisson Matrix Factorization · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian model selection
marginal likelihood estimation
0.312018
Closed-form Marginal Likelihood in Gamma-Poisson Matrix Factorization · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
matrix factorization
0.312018
Closed-form Marginal Likelihood in Gamma-Poisson Matrix Factorization · ICML 2018
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
topic model
0.312018
Closed-form Marginal Likelihood in Gamma-Poisson Matrix Factorization · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference
0.212022
Approximate Bayesian Computation with Domain Expert in the Loop · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
posterior inference
0.212022
Approximate Bayesian Computation with Domain Expert in the Loop · ICML 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

domain expert in the loop · 0.6active learning · 0.6monte carlo expectation-maximization · 0.3maximum marginal likelihood estimation · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Learning relevant contextual variables within Bayesian optimization
abstract
Contextual Bayesian Optimization (CBO) efficiently optimizes black-box functions with respect to design variables, while simultaneously integrating _contextual_ information regarding the environment, such as experimental conditions. However, the relevance of contextual variables is not necessarily known beforehand. Moreover, contextual variables can sometimes be optimized themselves at additional cost, a setting overlooked by current CBO algorithms. Cost-sensitive CBO would simply include optimizable contextual variables as part of the design variables based on their cost. Instead, we adaptively select a subset of contextual variables to include in the optimization, based on the trade-off between their _relevance_ and the additional cost incurred by optimizing them compared to leaving them to be determined by the environment. We learn the relevance of contextual variables by sensitivity analysis of the posterior surrogate model while minimizing the cost of optimization by leveraging recent developments on early stopping for BO. We empirically evaluate our proposed Sensitivity-Analysis-Driven Contextual BO (_SADCBO_) method against alternatives on both synthetic and real-world experiments, together with extensive ablation studies, and demonstrate a consistent improvement across examples.
Julien Martinelli, Ayush Bharti, Armi Tiihonen, S. T. John, Louis Filstroff, Sabina Sloman, Patrick Rinke, Samuel Kaski
UAI5
2023 Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization with Unreliable Information Sources
abstract
Bayesian optimization (BO) is a powerful framework for optimizing black-box, expensive-to-evaluate functions. Over the past decade, many algorithms have been proposed to integrate cheaper, lower-fidelity approximations of the objective function into the optimization process, with the goal of converging towards the global optimum at a reduced cost. This task is generally referred to as multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization (MFBO). However, MFBO algorithms can lead to higher optimization costs than their vanilla BO counterparts, especially when the low-fidelity sources are poor approximations of the objective function, therefore defeating their purpose. To address this issue, we propose rMFBO (robust MFBO), a methodology to make any GP-based MFBO scheme robust to the addition of unreliable information sources. rMFBO comes with a theoretical guarantee that its performance can be bound to its vanilla BO analog, with high controllable probability. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology on a number of numerical benchmarks, outperforming earlier MFBO methods on unreliable sources. We expect rMFBO to be particularly useful to reliably include human experts with varying knowledge within BO processes.
Petrus Mikkola, Julien Martinelli, Louis Filstroff, Samuel Kaski
AISTATS3
2022 Approximate Bayesian Computation with Domain Expert in the Loop
abstract
Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) is a popular likelihood-free inference method for models with intractable likelihood functions. As ABC methods usually rely on comparing summary statistics of observed and simulated data, the choice of the statistics is crucial. This choice involves a trade-off between loss of information and dimensionality reduction, and is often determined based on domain knowledge. However, handcrafting and selecting suitable statistics is a laborious task involving multiple trial-and-error steps. In this work, we introduce an active learning method for ABC statistics selection which reduces the domain expert’s work considerably. By involving the experts, we are able to handle misspecified models, unlike the existing dimension reduction methods. Moreover, empirical results show better posterior estimates than with existing methods, when the simulation budget is limited.
Ayush Bharti, Louis Filstroff, Samuel Kaski
ICML2
2020 Bayesian mean-parameterized nonnegative binary matrix factorization
Alberto Lumbreras, Louis Filstroff, Cédric Févotte
Data Min. Knowl. Discov.2
2019 A Ranking Model Motivated by Nonnegative Matrix Factorization with Applications to Tennis Tournaments
Vincent Y. F. Tan, Louis Filstroff, Cédric Févotte
ECML/PKDD (3)3
2018 Closed-form Marginal Likelihood in Gamma-Poisson Matrix Factorization
abstract
We present novel understandings of the Gamma-Poisson (GaP) model, a probabilistic matrix factorization model for count data. We show that GaP can be rewritten free of the score/activation matrix. This gives us new insights about the estimation of the topic/dictionary matrix by maximum marginal likelihood estimation. In particular, this explains the robustness of this estimator to over-specified values of the factorization rank, especially its ability to automatically prune irrelevant dictionary columns, as empirically observed in previous work. The marginalization of the activation matrix leads in turn to a new Monte Carlo Expectation-Maximization algorithm with favorable properties.
Louis Filstroff, Alberto Lumbreras, Cédric Févotte
ICML1
2018 An Empirical Study of Steganography and Steganalysis of Color Images in the JPEG Domain
Théo Taburet, Louis Filstroff, Patrick Bas, Wadih Sawaya
IWDW2