Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nihar Talele
dblp:213/9401
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Nonintuitive Optima for Dynamic Locomotion: The Acrollbot · ICRA 2018 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › underactuated robotics
under-actuated robots |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Nonintuitive Optima for Dynamic Locomotion: The Acrollbot · ICRA 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
trajectory optimization · 0.3direct collocation · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Nonintuitive Optima for Dynamic Locomotion: The AcrollbotabstractThis paper explores locally-optimal, efficient locomotion of a two-link planar robot balancing on a single, unactuated wheel. Because this model is essentially an acrobot mounted on a passive wheel, we name this model the acrollbot. By actuating an internal degree of freedom, the model can indirectly produce ground reaction forces yielding net accelerations and decelerations, to achieve locomotion. As with bipedal robot locomotion, this toy system is particularly challenging to control due to the need to balance continuously while controlling forward locomotion speed. However, unlike typical legged or rolling locomotion solutions, it is not immediately obvious how best to exploit actuation, internal reconfigurations, and motions to produce and control forward velocity along the ground, providing a useful benchmarking system for exploring optimization techniques. We use a direct collocation optimization framework to study this toy system, both to achieve a range of feasible locomotion solutions for nonintuitive dynamic robot models, and to investigate optimization of physical robot parameterizations, in the sense of improving locomotion efficiency. The framework and example presented throughout are designed with an aim toward bridging the gap between non-intuitive, data-driven optimization and model-based methods for design and control of underactuated and dynamically-stable locomotion. Guillaume Bellegarda, Nihar Talele, Katie Byl |
ICRA | 2 |