Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shuibo Zhang
dblp:214/0200
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Vision and language · 60% Language models and text generation · 32% Question answering and dialogue systems · 8% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation
data contamination |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Dynamic Multimodal Evaluation with Flexible Complexity by Vision-Language Bootstrapping · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Dynamic Multimodal Evaluation with Flexible Complexity by Vision-Language Bootstrapping · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Needle In A Multimodal Haystack · NeurIPS 2024 |
Information retrieval › document retrieval › text search
long document retrieval |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Needle In A Multimodal Haystack · NeurIPS 2024 |
Information retrieval
multimodal retrieval |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Needle In A Multimodal Haystack · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
multimodal question answering |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Needle In A Multimodal Haystack · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
benchmark evaluation · 1.5vision-language bootstrapping · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Dynamic Multimodal Evaluation with Flexible Complexity by Vision-Language BootstrappingabstractLarge Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across multimodal tasks such as visual perception and reasoning, leading to good performance on various multimodal evaluation benchmarks. However, these benchmarks keep a static nature and overlap with the pre-training data, resulting in fixed complexity constraints and data contamination issues. This raises the concern regarding the validity of the evaluation. To address these two challenges, we introduce a dynamic multimodal evaluation protocol called Vision-Language Bootstrapping (VLB). VLB provides a robust and comprehensive assessment for LVLMs with reduced data contamination and flexible complexity. To this end, VLB dynamically generates new visual question-answering samples through a multimodal bootstrapping module that modifies both images and language, while ensuring that newly generated samples remain consistent with the original ones by a judge module. By composing various bootstrapping strategies, VLB offers dynamic variants of existing benchmarks with diverse complexities, enabling the evaluation to co-evolve with the ever-evolving capabilities of LVLMs. Extensive experimental results across multiple benchmarks, including SEEDBench, MMBench, and MME, show that VLB significantly reduces data contamination and exposes performance limitations of LVLMs. Shuibo Zhang, Kaipeng Zhang, Yi Bin, Yu Wang 0002, Ping Luo 0002, Wenqi Shao |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2024 | Needle In A Multimodal HaystackabstractWith the rapid advancement of multimodal large language models (MLLMs), their evaluation has become increasingly comprehensive. However, understanding long multimodal content, as a foundational ability for real-world applications, remains underexplored. In this work, we present Needle In A Multimodal Haystack (MM-NIAH), the first benchmark specifically designed to systematically evaluate the capability of existing MLLMs to comprehend long multimodal documents. Our benchmark includes three types of evaluation tasks: multimodal retrieval, counting, and reasoning. In each task, the model is required to answer the questions according to different key information scattered throughout the given multimodal document. Evaluating the leading MLLMs on MM-NIAH, we observe that existing models still have significant room for improvement on these tasks, especially on vision-centric evaluation. We hope this work can provide a platform for further research on long multimodal document comprehension and contribute to the advancement of MLLMs. Code and benchmark are released at https://github.com/OpenGVLab/MM-NIAH. Weiyun Wang, Shuibo Zhang, Yiming Ren 0001, Yuchen Duan, Tiantong Li, Mengkang Hu, Zhe Chen 0017, Kaipeng Zhang, Lewei Lu, Xizhou Zhu, Ping Luo 0002, Yu Qiao 0001, Jifeng Dai, Wenqi Shao, Wenhai Wang |
NeurIPS | 2 |