EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
George Lu
dblp:214/6529
· DBLP profile ↗
17ranked-venue papers
7as first author
15since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-6178-461XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 15 · 6 first-author · 14 since 2021Theory of computation · 4 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Achieving Shannon Capacity for Computationally Bounded Errors
George Lu, Jad Silbak, Daniel Wichs |
CRYPTO (1) | 1 |
| 2026 | Succinct Garbled Circuits with Low-Depth Garbling Algorithms
Hanjun Li 0001, Huijia Lin, George Lu |
EUROCRYPT | 3 |
| 2025 | Succinct Computational Secret Sharing for Monotone Circuits
George Lu, Shafik Nassar, Brent Waters |
ASIACRYPT (8) | 1 |
| 2025 | How to Make Any Computational Secret Sharing Scheme Adaptively Secure
George Lu, Brent Waters |
CRYPTO (4) | 1 |
| 2025 | Multi-authority Registered Attribute-Based Encryption
George Lu, Brent Waters, David J. Wu 0001 |
EUROCRYPT (3) | 1 |
| 2025 | Binary Codes for Computationally Bounded Errors Under Standard Crypto AssumptionsabstractWe study error-detection and error-correction codes for computationally bounded adversarial channels. We consider seeded codes where the polynomial-time encoding and decoding procedures share a public random seed, but are otherwise deterministic. An adversarial channel gets this seed and can perform arbitrary polynomial-time computation to adaptively select both the message to be encoded and a bounded number of errors to be added to the resulting codeword. The goal is to detect or correct such errors with overwhelming probability, while achieving better trade-offs between rate and error tolerance than those possible for computationally unbounded channels. For large alphabets, prior work (ITCS ‘25) achieves essentially optimal parameters under minimal cryptographic assumptions. However, for the binary alphabet, prior works (TCC ‘20, EUROCRYPT ‘25) either only achieved a weaker notion of selective security under the learning with errors (LWE) assumption, or relied on non-standard cryptographic assumptions to get the full notion of adaptive security. In this work, we construct binary codes that achieve the full notion of adaptive security assuming trapdoor hashing, which can in turn be instantiated under a variety of standard cryptographic assumptions such as LWE, or Decisional DiffieHellman (DDH), or Quadratic Residuosity (QR), or Decisional Composite Residuosity (DCR). For error detection, our codes get essentially optimal rate $R \approx 1$ and relative error tolerance $p \approx \frac{1}{2}$. For error correction, they can uniquely correct $p\lt1 / 4$ fraction of errors with a rate R matching that of the best known list-decodable codes for this error tolerance. As a central technical tool of potentially independent interest, we construct multi-input correlation intractable hashing for “shifted output relations” under the standard cryptographic assumptions above. George Lu, Jad Silbak, Daniel Wichs |
FOCS | 1 |
| 2025 | A Hidden-Bits Approach to Statistical ZAPs from LWE
Eli Bradley, George Lu, Shafik Nassar, Brent Waters, David J. Wu 0001 |
TCC (4) | 2 |
| 2024 | Reducing the CRS Size in Registered ABE Systems
Rachit Garg 0001, George Lu, Brent Waters, David J. Wu 0001 |
CRYPTO (3) | 2 |
| 2024 | Limits on the Power of Prime-Order Groups: Separating Q-Type from Static Assumptions
George Lu, Mark Zhandry |
CRYPTO (5) | 1 |
| 2023 | Realizing Flexible Broadcast Encryption: How to Broadcast to a Public-Key DirectoryabstractSuppose a user wants to broadcast an encrypted message to K recipients. With public-key encryption, the sender would construct K different ciphertexts, one for each recipient. The size of the broadcasted message then scales linearly with K. A natural question is whether the sender can encrypt the message with a ciphertext whose size scales \em sublinearly with the number of recipients. Rachit Garg 0001, George Lu, Brent Waters, David J. Wu 0001 |
CCS | 2 |
| 2023 | On Non-uniform Security for Black-Box Non-interactive CCA Commitments
Rachit Garg 0001, Dakshita Khurana, George Lu, Brent Waters |
EUROCRYPT (1) | 3 |
| 2023 | Registered Attribute-Based Encryption
Susan Hohenberger, George Lu, Brent Waters, David J. Wu 0001 |
EUROCRYPT (3) | 2 |
| 2022 | Dynamic Collusion Bounded Functional Encryption from Identity-Based Encryption
Rachit Garg 0001, Rishab Goyal, George Lu, Brent Waters |
EUROCRYPT (2) | 3 |
| 2022 | How to Sample a Discrete Gaussian (and more) from a Random Oracle
George Lu, Brent Waters |
TCC (2) | 1 |
| 2021 | Black-Box Non-interactive Non-malleable Commitments
Rachit Garg 0001, Dakshita Khurana, George Lu, Brent Waters |
EUROCRYPT (3) | 3 |
| 2020 | New Techniques in Replica Encodings with Client Setup
Rachit Garg 0001, George Lu, Brent Waters |
TCC (3) | 2 |
| 2017 | An analytic solution for computing RSTD uncertainty in generating assistance data for OTDOA positioningabstractOTDOA (Observed Time Difference of Arrival) is a positioning method available in LTE. User Equipment (UE) that supports OTDOA requires assistance data from a location server. The quality of the assistance data directly impacts the UE measurement accuracy. The assistance data are specifications of a reference and neighbor cells for UE to measure. Expected RSTD (Reference Signal Time Difference) is included with the neighbor cell information. An analytic solution for computing the Expected RSTD and Expected RSTD uncertainty is proposed. The analytic solution is applied during generation of assistance to avoid possible PCI (Physical Cell Identity) ambiguity in OTDOA positioning. The overall goal with this analytic solution is to increase the final OTDOA positioning accuracy. Yinyan Wang, Robert Saxon, George Lu |
PIMRC | 3 |