Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Elia Turner

dblp:215/3415 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-3688-6483ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 73% Motion planning and robot control · 27%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network
1.222023
The Simplicity Bias in Multi-Task RNNs: Shared Attractors, Reuse of Dynamics, and Geometric Representation · NeurIPS 2023
Charting and Navigating the Space of Solutions for Recurrent Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2021
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › nonlinear dynamics
attractor dynamics
0.712023
The Simplicity Bias in Multi-Task RNNs: Shared Attractors, Reuse of Dynamics, and Geometric Representation · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
recurrent neural network dynamics
0.712023
The Simplicity Bias in Multi-Task RNNs: Shared Attractors, Reuse of Dynamics, and Geometric Representation · NeurIPS 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience
0.112021
Charting and Navigating the Space of Solutions for Recurrent Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2021
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
neural dynamics
0.112021
Charting and Navigating the Space of Solutions for Recurrent Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

dynamical systems analysis · 1.7reduced dynamics · 1.0recurrent neural network · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 The Simplicity Bias in Multi-Task RNNs: Shared Attractors, Reuse of Dynamics, and Geometric Representation
abstract
How does a single interconnected neural population perform multiple tasks, each with its own dynamical requirements? The relation between task requirements and neural dynamics in Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) has been investigated for single tasks. The forces shaping joint dynamics of multiple tasks, however, are largely unexplored. In this work, we first construct a systematic framework to study multiple tasks in RNNs, minimizing interference from input and output correlations with the hidden representation. This allows us to reveal how RNNs tend to share attractors and reuse dynamics, a tendency we define as the "simplicity bias". We find that RNNs develop attractors sequentially during training, preferentially reusing existing dynamics and opting for simple solutions when possible. This sequenced emergence and preferential reuse encapsulate the simplicity bias. Through concrete examples, we demonstrate that new attractors primarily emerge due to task demands or architectural constraints, illustrating a balance between simplicity bias and external factors. We examine the geometry of joint representations within a single attractor, by constructing a family of tasks from a set of functions. We show that the steepness of the associated functions controls their alignment within the attractor. This arrangement again highlights the simplicity bias, as points with similar input spacings undergo comparable transformations to reach the shared attractor. Our findings propose compelling applications. The geometry of shared attractors might allow us to infer the nature of unknown tasks. Furthermore, the simplicity bias implies that without specific incentives, modularity in RNNs may not spontaneously emerge, providing insights into the conditions required for network specialization.
Elia Turner, Omri Barak
NeurIPS1
2021 Charting and Navigating the Space of Solutions for Recurrent Neural Networks
abstract
In recent years Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) were successfully used to model the way neural activity drives task-related behavior in animals, operating under the implicit assumption that the obtained solutions are universal. Observations in both neuroscience and machine learning challenge this assumption. Animals can approach a given task with a variety of strategies, and training machine learning algorithms introduces the phenomenon of underspecification. These observations imply that every task is associated with a space of solutions. To date, the structure of this space is not understood, limiting the approach of comparing RNNs with neural data.Here, we characterize the space of solutions associated with various tasks. We first study a simple two-neuron network on a task that leads to multiple solutions. We trace the nature of the final solution back to the network’s initial connectivity and identify discrete dynamical regimes that underlie this diversity. We then examine three neuroscience-inspired tasks: Delayed discrimination, Interval discrimination, and Time reproduction. For each task, we find a rich set of solutions. One layer of variability can be found directly in the neural activity of the networks. An additional layer is uncovered by testing the trained networks' ability to extrapolate, as a perturbation to a system often reveals hidden structure. Furthermore, we relate extrapolation patterns to specific dynamical objects and effective algorithms found by the networks. We introduce a tool to derive the reduced dynamics of networks by generating a compact directed graph describing the essence of the dynamics with regards to behavioral inputs and outputs. Using this representation, we can partition the solutions to each task into a handful of types and show that neural features can partially predict them.Taken together, our results shed light on the concept of the space of solutions and its uses both in Machine learning and in Neuroscience.
Elia Turner, Kabir V. Dabholkar, Omri Barak
NeurIPS1
2020 Sparse matrix multiplication and triangle listing in the Congested Clique model
abstract
We show how to multiply two n×n matrices S and T over semirings in the Congested Clique model, where n nodes communicate in a fully connected synchronous network using O(log⁡n)-bit messages, within O(nz(S)1/3nz(T)1/3/n+1) rounds of communication, where nz(S) and nz(T) denote the number of non-zero elements in S and T, respectively. By leveraging the sparsity of the input matrices, our algorithm greatly reduces communication costs compared with general multiplication algorithms [Censor-Hillel et al. (2015) [9]], and thus improves upon the state-of-the-art for matrices with o(n2) non-zero elements. Moreover, our algorithm exhibits the additional strength of surpassing previous solutions also in the case where only one of the two matrices is such. Particularly, this allows to efficiently raise a sparse matrix to a power greater than 2. As applications, we show how to speed up the computation on non-dense graphs of 4-cycle counting and all-pairs-shortest-paths. Our algorithmic contribution is a new deterministic method of restructuring the input matrices in a sparsity-aware manner, which assigns each node with element-wise multiplication tasks that are not necessarily consecutive but guarantee a balanced element distribution, providing for communication-efficient multiplication. Moreover, this new deterministic method for restructuring matrices may be used to restructure the adjacency matrix of input graphs, enabling faster deterministic solutions for graph related problems. As an example, we present a new sparsity aware, deterministic algorithm which solves the triangle listing problem in O(m/n5/3+1) rounds, a complexity that was previously obtained by a randomized algorithm [Pandurangan et al. (2018) [26]], and that matches the known lower bound of Ω˜(n1/3) when m=n2 of [Izumi and Le Gall (2017) [19], Pandurangan et al. (2018) [26]]. Naturally, our triangle listing algorithm also implies triangle counting within the same complexity of O(m/n5/3+1) rounds, which is (possibly more than) a cubic improvement over the previously known deterministic O(m2/n3)-round algorithm [Dolev et al. (2012) [12]].
Keren Censor-Hillel, Dean Leitersdorf, Elia Turner
Theor. Comput. Sci.3
2018 Sparse Matrix Multiplication and Triangle Listing in the Congested Clique Model
Keren Censor-Hillel, Dean Leitersdorf, Elia Turner
OPODIS3