Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
William J. Wilkinson
dblp:215/3480
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-2519-8653ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 94% Time series and sequential data · 6% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Audio and music processing · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
approximate bayesian inference |
1.5 | 3 | 2023 | Bayes-Newton Methods for Approximate Bayesian Inference with PSD Guarantees · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 State Space Expectation Propagation: Efficient Inference Schemes for Temporal Gaussian Processes · ICML 2020 End-to-End Probabilistic Inference for Nonstationary Audio Analysis · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
expectation propagation |
1.5 | 3 | 2023 | Bayes-Newton Methods for Approximate Bayesian Inference with PSD Guarantees · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 State Space Expectation Propagation: Efficient Inference Schemes for Temporal Gaussian Processes · ICML 2020 End-to-End Probabilistic Inference for Nonstationary Audio Analysis · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
1.3 | 3 | 2021 | Spatio-Temporal Variational Gaussian Processes · NeurIPS 2021 State Space Expectation Propagation: Efficient Inference Schemes for Temporal Gaussian Processes · ICML 2020 End-to-End Probabilistic Inference for Nonstationary Audio Analysis · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference › gradient-based variational inference
natural gradient variational inference |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Bayes-Newton Methods for Approximate Bayesian Inference with PSD Guarantees · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 Spatio-Temporal Variational Gaussian Processes · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Bayes-Newton Methods for Approximate Bayesian Inference with PSD Guarantees · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 Spatio-Temporal Variational Gaussian Processes · NeurIPS 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › numerical computation › numerical optimization › second-order methods
newton's method |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Bayes-Newton Methods for Approximate Bayesian Inference with PSD Guarantees · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › numerical computation
numerical optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Bayes-Newton Methods for Approximate Bayesian Inference with PSD Guarantees · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › numerical computation › numerical optimization › second-order methods › newton's method
quasi-newton method |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Bayes-Newton Methods for Approximate Bayesian Inference with PSD Guarantees · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
spatio-temporal gaussian process |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Spatio-Temporal Variational Gaussian Processes · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis › bayesian filtering and smoothing
kalman smoothing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | State Space Expectation Propagation: Efficient Inference Schemes for Temporal Gaussian Processes · ICML 2020 |
Audio and music processing
audio analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | End-to-End Probabilistic Inference for Nonstationary Audio Analysis · ICML 2019 |
Audio and music processing
time-frequency analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | End-to-End Probabilistic Inference for Nonstationary Audio Analysis · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
sparse gaussian process |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Spatio-Temporal Variational Gaussian Processes · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
natural gradient · 1.8gauss-newton · 1.3BFGS · 1.3kalman filtering · 0.8parallel filtering and smoothing · 0.5mean-field approximation · 0.5variational inference · 0.4unscented transform · 0.4linearization · 0.4state space model · 0.4nonnegative matrix factorization · 0.4non-negative matrix factorization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Bayes-Newton Methods for Approximate Bayesian Inference with PSD GuaranteesabstractWe formulate natural gradient variational inference (VI), expectation propagation (EP), and posterior linearisation (PL) as extensions of Newton's method for optimising the parameters of a Bayesian posterior distribution. This viewpoint explicitly casts inference algorithms under the framework of numerical optimisation. We show that common approximations to Newton's method from the optimisation literature, namely Gauss-Newton and quasi-Newton methods (e.g., the BFGS algorithm), are still valid under this 'Bayes-Newton' framework. This leads to a suite of novel algorithms which are guaranteed to result in positive semi-definite (PSD) covariance matrices, unlike standard VI and EP. Our unifying viewpoint provides new insights into the connections between various inference schemes. All the presented methods apply to any model with a Gaussian prior and non-conjugate likelihood, which we demonstrate with (sparse) Gaussian processes and state space models. William J. Wilkinson, Simo Särkkä, Arno Solin |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2021 | Sparse Algorithms for Markovian Gaussian ProcessesabstractApproximate Bayesian inference methods that scale to very large datasets are crucial in leveraging probabilistic models for real-world time series. Sparse Markovian Gaussian processes combine the use of inducing variables with efficient Kalman filter-like recursions, resulting in algorithms whose computational and memory requirements scale linearly in the number of inducing points, whilst also enabling parallel parameter updates and stochastic optimisation. Under this paradigm, we derive a general site-based approach to approximate inference, whereby we approximate the non-Gaussian likelihood with local Gaussian terms, called sites. Our approach results in a suite of novel sparse extensions to algorithms from both the machine learning and signal processing literature, including variational inference, expectation propagation, and the classical nonlinear Kalman smoothers. The derived methods are suited to large time series, and we also demonstrate their applicability to spatio-temporal data, where the model has separate inducing points in both time and space. William J. Wilkinson, Arno Solin, Vincent Adam |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2021 | Spatio-Temporal Variational Gaussian ProcessesabstractWe introduce a scalable approach to Gaussian process inference that combines spatio-temporal filtering with natural gradient variational inference, resulting in a non-conjugate GP method for multivariate data that scales linearly with respect to time. Our natural gradient approach enables application of parallel filtering and smoothing, further reducing the temporal span complexity to be logarithmic in the number of time steps. We derive a sparse approximation that constructs a state-space model over a reduced set of spatial inducing points, and show that for separable Markov kernels the full and sparse cases exactly recover the standard variational GP, whilst exhibiting favourable computational properties. To further improve the spatial scaling we propose a mean-field assumption of independence between spatial locations which, when coupled with sparsity and parallelisation, leads to an efficient and accurate method for large spatio-temporal problems. Oliver Hamelijnck, William J. Wilkinson, Niki Andreas Lopi, Arno Solin, Theodoros Damoulas |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2020 | Movement Tracking by Optical Flow Assisted Inertial NavigationabstractRobust and accurate six degree-of-freedom tracking on portable devices remains a challenging problem, especially on small hand-held devices such as smartphones. For improved robustness and accuracy, complementary movement information from an IMU and a camera is often fused. Conventional visual-inertial methods fuse information from IMUs with a sparse cloud of feature points tracked by the device camera. We consider a visually dense approach, where the IMU data is fused with the dense optical flow field estimated from the camera data. Learning-based methods applied to the full image frames can leverage visual cues and global consistency of the flow field to improve the flow estimates. We show how a learning-based optical flow model can be combined with conventional inertial navigation, and how ideas from probabilistic deep learning can aid the robustness of the measurement updates. The practical applicability is demonstrated on real-world data acquired by an iPad in a challenging low-texture environment. Lassi Meronen, William J. Wilkinson, Arno Solin |
FUSION | 2 |
| 2020 | State Space Expectation Propagation: Efficient Inference Schemes for Temporal Gaussian ProcessesabstractWe formulate approximate Bayesian inference in non-conjugate temporal and spatio-temporal Gaussian process models as a simple parameter update rule applied during Kalman smoothing. This viewpoint encompasses most inference schemes, including expectation propagation (EP), the classical (Extended, Unscented, etc.) Kalman smoothers, and variational inference. We provide a unifying perspective on these algorithms, showing how replacing the power EP moment matching step with linearisation recovers the classical smoothers. EP provides some benefits over the traditional methods via introduction of the so-called cavity distribution, and we combine these benefits with the computational efficiency of linearisation, providing extensive empirical analysis demonstrating the efficacy of various algorithms under this unifying framework. We provide a fast implementation of all methods in JAX. William J. Wilkinson, Paul E. Chang, Michael Riis Andersen, Arno Solin |
ICML | 1 |
| 2019 | Unifying Probabilistic Models for Time-frequency AnalysisabstractIn audio signal processing, probabilistic time-frequency models have many benefits over their non-probabilistic counterparts. They adapt to the incoming signal, quantify uncertainty, and measure correlation between the signal’s amplitude and phase information, making time domain resynthesis straightforward. However, these models are still not widely used since they come at a high computational cost, and because they are formulated in such a way that it can be difficult to interpret all the modelling assumptions. By showing their equivalence to Spectral Mixture Gaussian processes, we illuminate the underlying model assumptions and provide a general framework for constructing more complex models that better approximate real-world signals. Our interpretation makes it intuitive to inspect, compare, and alter the models since all prior knowledge is encoded in the Gaussian process kernel functions. We utilise a state space representation to perform efficient inference via Kalman smoothing, and we demonstrate how our interpretation allows for efficient parameter learning in the frequency domain. William J. Wilkinson, Michael Riis Andersen, Joshua D. Reiss, Dan Stowell, Arno Solin |
ICASSP | 1 |
| 2019 | End-to-End Probabilistic Inference for Nonstationary Audio AnalysisabstractA typical audio signal processing pipeline includes multiple disjoint analysis stages, including calculation of a time-frequency representation followed by spectrogram-based feature analysis. We show how time-frequency analysis and nonnegative matrix factorisation can be jointly formulated as a spectral mixture Gaussian process model with nonstationary priors over the amplitude variance parameters. Further, we formulate this nonlinear model’s state space representation, making it amenable to infinite-horizon Gaussian process regression with approximate inference via expectation propagation, which scales linearly in the number of time steps and quadratically in the state dimensionality. By doing so, we are able to process audio signals with hundreds of thousands of data points. We demonstrate, on various tasks with empirical data, how this inference scheme outperforms more standard techniques that rely on extended Kalman filtering. William J. Wilkinson, Michael Riis Andersen, Joshua D. Reiss, Dan Stowell, Arno Solin |
ICML | 1 |