Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adam Bielski
dblp:215/3579
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 42% Optimization for machine learning · 38% Representation and self-supervised learning · 12% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › object segmentation
unsupervised object segmentation |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | MOVE: Unsupervised Movable Object Segmentation and Detection · NeurIPS 2022 Emergence of Object Segmentation in Perturbed Generative Models · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
adaptive optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | KOALA: A Kalman Optimization Algorithm with Loss Adaptivity · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | KOALA: A Kalman Optimization Algorithm with Loss Adaptivity · AAAI 2022 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › saliency detection
salient object detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | MOVE: Unsupervised Movable Object Segmentation and Detection · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
self-supervised representation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | MOVE: Unsupervised Movable Object Segmentation and Detection · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | KOALA: A Kalman Optimization Algorithm with Loss Adaptivity · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Emergence of Object Segmentation in Perturbed Generative Models · NeurIPS 2019 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
object segmentation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Emergence of Object Segmentation in Perturbed Generative Models · NeurIPS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
adversarial training · 1.0self-supervised learning · 0.6momentum · 0.6kalman filtering · 0.6inpainting · 0.6gradient descent · 0.6adam · 0.6layered scene representation · 0.4autoencoder · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | KOALA: A Kalman Optimization Algorithm with Loss AdaptivityabstractOptimization is often cast as a deterministic problem, where the solution is found through some iterative procedure such as gradient descent. However, when training neural networks the loss function changes over (iteration) time due to the randomized selection of a subset of the samples. This randomization turns the optimization problem into a stochastic one. We propose to consider the loss as a noisy observation with respect to some reference optimum. This interpretation of the loss allows us to adopt Kalman filtering as an optimizer, as its recursive formulation is designed to estimate unknown parameters from noisy measurements. Moreover, we show that the Kalman Filter dynamical model for the evolution of the unknown parameters can be used to capture the gradient dynamics of advanced methods such as Momentum and Adam. We call this stochastic optimization method KOALA, which is short for Kalman Optimization Algorithm with Loss Adaptivity. KOALA is an easy to implement, scalable, and efficient method to train neural networks. We provide convergence analysis and show experimentally that it yields parameter estimates that are on par with or better than existing state of the art optimization algorithms across several neural network architectures and machine learning tasks, such as computer vision and language modeling. The project page with the code and the supplementary materials is available at https://araachie.github.io/koala/. Aram Davtyan, Sepehr Sameni, Llukman Cerkezi, Givi Meishvili, Adam Bielski, Paolo Favaro |
AAAI | 5 |
| 2022 | MOVE: Unsupervised Movable Object Segmentation and DetectionabstractWe introduce MOVE, a novel method to segment objects without any form of supervision. MOVE exploits the fact that foreground objects can be shifted locally relative to their initial position and result in realistic (undistorted) new images. This property allows us to train a segmentation model on a dataset of images without annotation and to achieve state of the art (SotA) performance on several evaluation datasets for unsupervised salient object detection and segmentation. In unsupervised single object discovery, MOVE gives an average CorLoc improvement of 7.2% over the SotA, and in unsupervised class-agnostic object detection it gives a relative AP improvement of 53% on average. Our approach is built on top of self-supervised features (e.g. from DINO or MAE), an inpainting network (based on the Masked AutoEncoder) and adversarial training. Adam Bielski, Paolo Favaro |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | Emergence of Object Segmentation in Perturbed Generative ModelsabstractWe introduce a novel framework to build a model that can learn how to segment objects from a collection of images without any human annotation. Our method builds on the observation that the location of object segments can be perturbed locally relative to a given background without affecting the realism of a scene. Our approach is to first train a generative model of a layered scene. The layered representation consists of a background image, a foreground image and the mask of the foreground. A composite image is then obtained by overlaying the masked foreground image onto the background. The generative model is trained in an adversarial fashion against a discriminator, which forces the generative model to produce realistic composite images. To force the generator to learn a representation where the foreground layer corresponds to an object, we perturb the output of the generative model by introducing a random shift of both the foreground image and mask relative to the background. Because the generator is unaware of the shift before computing its output, it must produce layered representations that are realistic for any such random perturbation. Finally, we learn to segment an image by defining an autoencoder consisting of an encoder, which we train, and the pre-trained generator as the decoder, which we freeze. The encoder maps an image to a feature vector, which is fed as input to the generator to give a composite image matching the original input image. Because the generator outputs an explicit layered representation of the scene, the encoder learns to detect and segment objects. We demonstrate this framework on real images of several object categories. Adam Bielski, Paolo Favaro |
NeurIPS | 1 |