Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jeremy Bernstein
dblp:215/3638 · also Jeremy D. Bernstein
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
5as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 5 first-author · 5 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
10 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 31% Deep learning architectures and training · 20% Learning theory · 20% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training optimization
learning rate tuning |
0.9 | 2 | 2020 | Learning compositional functions via multiplicative weight updates · NeurIPS 2020 On the distance between two neural networks and the stability of learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
second-order optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Modular Duality in Deep Learning · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › normalization
weight normalization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Scalable Optimization in the Modular Norm · NeurIPS 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
lipschitz continuity |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Scalable Optimization in the Modular Norm · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.7 | 2 | 2022 | Investigating Generalization by Controlling Normalized Margin · ICML 2022 Learning by Turning: Neural Architecture Aware Optimisation · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | signSGD with Majority Vote is Communication Efficient and Fault Tolerant · ICLR (Poster) 2019 SIGNSGD: Compressed Optimisation for Non-Convex Problems · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Investigating Generalization by Controlling Normalized Margin · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization
margin-based generalization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Investigating Generalization by Controlling Normalized Margin · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization › gradient descent
projected gradient descent |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning by Turning: Neural Architecture Aware Optimisation · ICML 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Fine-Grained System Identification of Nonlinear Neural Circuits · KDD 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning compositional functions via multiplicative weight updates · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › mirror descent
multiplicative updates |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning compositional functions via multiplicative weight updates · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
fault tolerance |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | signSGD with Majority Vote is Communication Efficient and Fault Tolerant · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning
adversarial defense |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Stochastic Activation Pruning for Robust Adversarial Defense · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Stochastic Activation Pruning for Robust Adversarial Defense · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
gradient compression |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | SIGNSGD: Compressed Optimisation for Non-Convex Problems · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › causal representation learning
identifiability |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Fine-Grained System Identification of Nonlinear Neural Circuits · KDD 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | SIGNSGD: Compressed Optimisation for Non-Convex Problems · ICML 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
recursive norm definition · 1.5modular norm · 1.5system identification · 1.0sparse recovery · 1.0sign constraints · 1.0newton-schulz iteration · 0.9modular dualization · 0.9signSGD · 0.7majority vote · 0.7gaussian process models · 0.6experimental study · 0.6projected gradient descent · 0.5balanced networks · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Modular Duality in Deep LearningabstractAn old idea in optimization theory says that since the gradient is a dual vector it may not be subtracted from the weights without first being mapped to the primal space where the weights reside. We take this idea seriously in this paper and construct such a duality map for general neural networks. Our map, which we call modular dualization, forms a unifying theoretical basis for training algorithms that are a) fast and b) scalable. Modular dualization involves first assigning operator norms to layers based on the semantics of each layer, and then using these layerwise norms to recursively induce a duality map on the weight space of the full neural architecture. We derive GPU-friendly algorithms for dualizing Embed, Linear and Conv2D layers—the latter two methods are based on a Newton-Schulz iteration. We conclude with small experiments demonstrating the speed, scalability and novel numerical properties of duality-based optimizers. Our methods were used in the Muon optimizer, which recently set speed records for training NanoGPT and was scaled up to a 1.5 billion parameter transformer. Jeremy Bernstein, Laker Newhouse |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Scalable Optimization in the Modular NormabstractTo improve performance in contemporary deep learning, one is interested in scaling up the neural network in terms of both the number and the size of the layers. When ramping up the width of a single layer, graceful scaling of training has been linked to the need to normalize the weights and their updates in the "natural norm" particular to that layer. In this paper, we significantly generalize this idea by defining the modular norm, which is the natural norm on the full weight space of any neural network architecture. The modular norm is defined recursively in tandem with the network architecture itself. We show that the modular norm has several promising applications. On the practical side, the modular norm can be used to normalize the updates of any base optimizer so that the learning rate becomes transferable across width and depth. This means that the user does not need to compute optimizer-specific scale factors in order to scale training. On the theoretical side, we show that for any neural network built from "well-behaved" atomic modules, the gradient of the network is Lipschitz-continuous in the modular norm, with the Lipschitz constant admitting a simple recursive formula. This characterization opens the door to porting standard ideas in optimization theory over to deep learning. We have created a Python package called Modula that automatically normalizes weight updates in the modular norm of the architecture. Both the Modula package and code for our experiments are provided in the supplementary material. Tim Large, Jacob Huh, Hyojin Bahng, Phillip Isola, Jeremy Bernstein |
NeurIPS | 6 |
| 2022 | Investigating Generalization by Controlling Normalized MarginabstractWeight norm $\|w\|$ and margin $\gamma$ participate in learning theory via the normalized margin $\gamma/\|w\|$. Since standard neural net optimizers do not control normalized margin, it is hard to test whether this quantity causally relates to generalization. This paper designs a series of experimental studies that explicitly control normalized margin and thereby tackle two central questions. First: does normalized margin always have a causal effect on generalization? The paper finds that no—networks can be produced where normalized margin has seemingly no relationship with generalization, counter to the theory of Bartlett et al. (2017). Second: does normalized margin ever have a causal effect on generalization? The paper finds that yes—in a standard training setup, test performance closely tracks normalized margin. The paper suggests a Gaussian process model as a promising explanation for this behavior. Alexander R. Farhang, Jeremy Bernstein, Kushal Tirumala, Yisong Yue |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | Learning by Turning: Neural Architecture Aware OptimisationabstractDescent methods for deep networks are notoriously capricious: they require careful tuning of step size, momentum and weight decay, and which method will work best on a new benchmark is a priori unclear. To address this problem, this paper conducts a combined study of neural architecture and optimisation, leading to a new optimiser called Nero: the neuronal rotator. Nero trains reliably without momentum or weight decay, works in situations where Adam and SGD fail, and requires little to no learning rate tuning. Also, Nero’s memory footprint is square root that of Adam or LAMB. Nero combines two ideas: (1) projected gradient descent over the space of balanced networks; (2) neuron-specific updates, where the step size sets the angle through which each neuron’s hyperplane turns. The paper concludes by discussing how this geometric connection between architecture and optimisation may impact theories of generalisation in deep learning. Jeremy Bernstein, Markus Meister, Yisong Yue |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | Fine-Grained System Identification of Nonlinear Neural CircuitsabstractWe study the problem of sparse nonlinear model recovery of high dimensional compositional functions. Our study is motivated by emerging opportunities in neuroscience to recover fine-grained models of biological neural circuits using collected measurement data. Guided by available domain knowledge in neuroscience, we explore conditions under which one can recover the underlying biological circuit that generated the training data. Our results suggest insights of both theoretical and practical interests. Most notably, we find that a sign constraint on the weights is a necessary condition for system recovery, which we establish both theoretically with an identifiability guarantee and empirically on simulated biological circuits. We conclude with a case study on retinal ganglion cell circuits using data collected from mouse retina, showcasing the practical potential of this approach. Dawna Bagherian, James Gornet, Jeremy Bernstein, Yu-Li Ni, Yisong Yue, Markus Meister |
KDD | 3 |
| 2020 | On the distance between two neural networks and the stability of learningabstractThis paper relates parameter distance to gradient breakdown for a broad class of nonlinear compositional functions. The analysis leads to a new distance function called deep relative trust and a descent lemma for neural networks. Since the resulting learning rule seems to require little to no learning rate tuning, it may unlock a simpler workflow for training deeper and more complex neural networks. The Python code used in this paper is here: https://github.com/jxbz/fromage. Jeremy Bernstein, Arash Vahdat, Yisong Yue, Ming-Yu Liu 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Learning compositional functions via multiplicative weight updatesabstractCompositionality is a basic structural feature of both biological and artificial neural networks. Learning compositional functions via gradient descent incurs well known problems like vanishing and exploding gradients, making careful learning rate tuning essential for real-world applications. This paper proves that multiplicative weight updates satisfy a descent lemma tailored to compositional functions. Based on this lemma, we derive Madam---a multiplicative version of the Adam optimiser---and show that it can train state of the art neural network architectures without learning rate tuning. We further show that Madam is easily adapted to train natively compressed neural networks by representing their weights in a logarithmic number system. We conclude by drawing connections between multiplicative weight updates and recent findings about synapses in biology. Jeremy Bernstein, Markus Meister, Ming-Yu Liu 0001, Anima Anandkumar, Yisong Yue |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | signSGD with Majority Vote is Communication Efficient and Fault Tolerant
Jeremy Bernstein, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Anima Anandkumar |
ICLR (Poster) | 1 |
| 2018 | Stochastic Activation Pruning for Robust Adversarial Defense
Guneet S. Dhillon 0001, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Zachary C. Lipton, Jeremy Bernstein, Jean Kossaifi, Aran Khanna, Anima Anandkumar |
ICLR (Poster) | 4 |
| 2018 | SIGNSGD: Compressed Optimisation for Non-Convex ProblemsabstractTraining large neural networks requires distributing learning across multiple workers, where the cost of communicating gradients can be a significant bottleneck. signSGD alleviates this problem by transmitting just the sign of each minibatch stochastic gradient. We prove that it can get the best of both worlds: compressed gradients and SGD-level convergence rate. The relative $\ell_1/\ell_2$ geometry of gradients, noise and curvature informs whether signSGD or SGD is theoretically better suited to a particular problem. On the practical side we find that the momentum counterpart of signSGD is able to match the accuracy and convergence speed of Adam on deep Imagenet models. We extend our theory to the distributed setting, where the parameter server uses majority vote to aggregate gradient signs from each worker enabling 1-bit compression of worker-server communication in both directions. Using a theorem by Gauss we prove that majority vote can achieve the same reduction in variance as full precision distributed SGD. Thus, there is great promise for sign-based optimisation schemes to achieve fast communication and fast convergence. Code to reproduce experiments is to be found at https://github.com/jxbz/signSGD. Jeremy Bernstein, Yu-Xiang Wang 0003, Kamyar Azizzadenesheli, Anima Anandkumar |
ICML | 1 |