Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arpit Gogia

dblp:215/3646 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0006-0949-0888ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Hardware security and side channels · 95% Web and mobile security · 5%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 77% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 23%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Graph learning · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware security and side channels › microarchitectural attacks › transient execution attack › speculative execution attack
spectre defense
0.912025
AMuLeT: Automated Design-Time Testing of Secure Speculation Countermeasures · ASPLOS (2) 2025
Hardware security and side channels › microarchitectural attacks › transient execution attack
speculative execution attack
0.912025
AMuLeT: Automated Design-Time Testing of Secure Speculation Countermeasures · ASPLOS (2) 2025
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.912025
AMuLeT: Automated Design-Time Testing of Secure Speculation Countermeasures · ASPLOS (2) 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.312018
Collective Classification of Spam Campaigners on Twitter: A Hierarchical Meta-Path Based Approach · WWW 2018
Data mining › anomaly detection
spam detection
0.312018
Collective Classification of Spam Campaigners on Twitter: A Hierarchical Meta-Path Based Approach · WWW 2018
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › speculative execution
secure speculation
0.312025
AMuLeT: Automated Design-Time Testing of Secure Speculation Countermeasures · ASPLOS (2) 2025
Web and mobile security
online social network abuse
0.112018
Collective Classification of Spam Campaigners on Twitter: A Hierarchical Meta-Path Based Approach · WWW 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

automated design-time testing · 1.7meta-path · 1.0collective classification · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 AMuLeT: Automated Design-Time Testing of Secure Speculation Countermeasures
abstract
In recent years, several hardware-based countermeasures proposed to mitigate Spectre attacks have been shown to be insecure. To enable the development of effective secure speculation countermeasures, we need easy-to-use tools that can automatically test their security guarantees early-on in the design phase to facilitate rapid prototyping.
Leo Tenenbaum, David Adler, Assaf Klein, Arpit Gogia, Alaa R. Alameldeen, Marco Guarnieri, Mark Silberstein, Oleksii Oleksenko, Gururaj Saileshwar
ASPLOS (2)5
2018 Collective Classification of Spam Campaigners on Twitter: A Hierarchical Meta-Path Based Approach
abstract
Cybercriminals have leveraged the popularity of a large user base available on Online Social Networks~(OSNs) to spread spam campaigns by propagating phishing URLs, attaching malicious contents, etc. However, another kind of spam attacks using phone numbers has recently become prevalent on OSNs, where spammers advertise phone numbers to attract users» attention and convince them to make a call to these phone numbers. The dynamics of phone number based spam is different from URL-based spam due to an inherent trust associated with a phone number. While previous work has proposed strategies to mitigate URL-based spam attacks, phone number based spam attacks have received less attention.
Srishti Gupta 0003, Abhinav Khattar, Arpit Gogia, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru, Tanmoy Chakraborty 0002
WWW3