EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Paul Rolland
dblp:215/4294
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
5as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 5 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 32% Reinforcement learning · 18% Learning theory · 18% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 25 heaviest of 28, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
langevin dynamics |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Double-Loop Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm · ICML 2020 Mirrored Langevin Dynamics · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
sampling |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Double-Loop Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm · ICML 2020 Mirrored Langevin Dynamics · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal discovery |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Score Matching Enables Causal Discovery of Nonlinear Additive Noise Models · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
inverse reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Identifiability and generalizability from multiple experts in Inverse Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning › inverse reinforcement learning
reward identifiability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Identifiability and generalizability from multiple experts in Inverse Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
score matching |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Score Matching Enables Causal Discovery of Nonlinear Additive Noise Models · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The Effect of the Intrinsic Dimension on the Generalization of Quadratic Classifiers · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › manifold learning
intrinsic dimension |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The Effect of the Intrinsic Dimension on the Generalization of Quadratic Classifiers · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
rademacher complexity |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The Effect of the Intrinsic Dimension on the Generalization of Quadratic Classifiers · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The Effect of the Intrinsic Dimension on the Generalization of Quadratic Classifiers · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Robust Reinforcement Learning via Adversarial training with Langevin Dynamics · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › certified robustness
lipschitz constant estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Lipschitz constant estimation of Neural Networks via sparse polynomial optimization · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
log-concave sampling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Double-Loop Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
neural network regularization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Efficient Proximal Mapping of the 1-path-norm of Shallow Networks · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization › norm-based regularization
path norm regularization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Efficient Proximal Mapping of the 1-path-norm of Shallow Networks · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Robust Reinforcement Learning via Adversarial training with Langevin Dynamics · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Lipschitz constant estimation of Neural Networks via sparse polynomial optimization · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
robust reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Robust Reinforcement Learning via Adversarial training with Langevin Dynamics · NeurIPS 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › global optimization
polynomial optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Lipschitz constant estimation of Neural Networks via sparse polynomial optimization · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Efficient learning of smooth probability functions from Bernoulli tests with guarantees · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
constrained sampling |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Mirrored Langevin Dynamics · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Mirrored Langevin Dynamics · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
mirror descent |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Mirrored Langevin Dynamics · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Efficient Proximal Mapping of the 1-path-norm of Shallow Networks · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
lipschitz constant |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Efficient Proximal Mapping of the 1-path-norm of Shallow Networks · ICML 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sparse polynomial optimization · 0.9score matching · 0.6jacobian approximation · 0.6rademacher complexity analysis · 0.5nuclear-norm constraint · 0.5wasserstein distance bound · 0.4stochastic optimization · 0.4stochastic gradient langevin dynamics · 0.4proximal gradient · 0.4annealing step-size schedule · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Score Matching Enables Causal Discovery of Nonlinear Additive Noise ModelsabstractThis paper demonstrates how to recover causal graphs from the score of the data distribution in non-linear additive (Gaussian) noise models. Using score matching algorithms as a building block, we show how to design a new generation of scalable causal discovery methods. To showcase our approach, we also propose a new efficient method for approximating the score’s Jacobian, enabling to recover the causal graph. Empirically, we find that the new algorithm, called SCORE, is competitive with state-of-the-art causal discovery methods while being significantly faster. Paul Rolland, Volkan Cevher, Matthäus Kleindessner, Chris Russell 0001, Dominik Janzing, Bernhard Schölkopf, Francesco Locatello |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | Identifiability and generalizability from multiple experts in Inverse Reinforcement LearningabstractWhile Reinforcement Learning (RL) aims to train an agent from a reward function in a given environment, Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) seeks to recover the reward function from observing an expert's behavior. It is well known that, in general, various reward functions can lead to the same optimal policy, and hence, IRL is ill-defined. However, \cite{cao2021identifiability} showed that, if we observe two or more experts with different discount factors or acting in different environments, the reward function can under certain conditions be identified up to a constant. This work starts by showing an equivalent identifiability statement from multiple experts in tabular MDPs based on a rank condition, which is easily verifiable and is shown to be also necessary. We then extend our result to various different scenarios, i.e., we characterize reward identifiability in the case where the reward function can be represented as a linear combination of given features, making it more interpretable, or when we have access to approximate transition matrices. Even when the reward is not identifiable, we provide conditions characterizing when data on multiple experts in a given environment allows to generalize and train an optimal agent in a new environment. Our theoretical results on reward identifiability and generalizability are validated in various numerical experiments. Paul Rolland, Luca Viano, Norman Schürhoff, Boris Nikolov, Volkan Cevher |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | The Effect of the Intrinsic Dimension on the Generalization of Quadratic ClassifiersabstractIt has been recently observed that neural networks, unlike kernel methods, enjoy a reduced sample complexity when the distribution is isotropic (i.e., when the covariance matrix is the identity). We find that this sensitivity to the data distribution is not exclusive to neural networks, and the same phenomenon can be observed on the class of quadratic classifiers (i.e., the sign of a quadratic polynomial) with a nuclear-norm constraint. We demonstrate this by deriving an upper bound on the Rademacher Complexity that depends on two key quantities: (i) the intrinsic dimension, which is a measure of isotropy, and (ii) the largest eigenvalue of the second moment (covariance) matrix of the distribution. Our result improves the dependence on the dimension over the best previously known bound and precisely quantifies the relation between the sample complexity and the level of isotropy of the distribution. Fabian Latorre, Leello Tadesse Dadi, Paul Rolland, Volkan Cevher |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2020 | Lipschitz constant estimation of Neural Networks via sparse polynomial optimization
Fabian Latorre, Paul Rolland, Volkan Cevher |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2020 | Efficient Proximal Mapping of the 1-path-norm of Shallow NetworksabstractWe demonstrate two new important properties of the 1-path-norm of shallow neural networks. First, despite its non-smoothness and non-convexity it allows a closed form proximal operator which can be efficiently computed, allowing the use of stochastic proximal-gradient-type methods for regularized empirical risk minimization. Second, when the activation functions is differentiable, it provides an upper bound on the Lipschitz constant of the network. Such bound is tighter than the trivial layer-wise product of Lipschitz constants, motivating its use for training networks robust to adversarial perturbations. In practical experiments we illustrate the advantages of using the proximal mapping and we compare the robustness-accuracy trade-off induced by the 1-path-norm, L1-norm and layer-wise constraints on the Lipschitz constant (Parseval networks). Fabian Latorre, Paul Rolland, Nadav Hallak, Volkan Cevher |
ICML | 2 |
| 2020 | Double-Loop Unadjusted Langevin AlgorithmabstractA well-known first-order method for sampling from log-concave probability distributions is the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm (ULA). This work proposes a new annealing step-size schedule for ULA, which allows to prove new convergence guarantees for sampling from a smooth log-concave distribution, which are not covered by existing state-of-the-art convergence guarantees. To establish this result, we derive a new theoretical bound that relates the Wasserstein distance to total variation distance between any two log-concave distributions that complements the reach of Talagrand $T_2$ inequality. Moreover, applying this new step size schedule to an existing constrained sampling algorithm, we show state-of-the-art convergence rates for sampling from a constrained log-concave distribution, as well as improved dimension dependence. Paul Rolland, Armin Eftekhari, Ali Kavis, Volkan Cevher |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | Robust Reinforcement Learning via Adversarial training with Langevin DynamicsabstractWe introduce a \emph{sampling} perspective to tackle the challenging task of training robust Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents. Leveraging the powerful Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics, we present a novel, scalable two-player RL algorithm, which is a sampling variant of the two-player policy gradient method. Our algorithm consistently outperforms existing baselines, in terms of generalization across different training and testing conditions, on several MuJoCo environments. Our experiments also show that, even for objective functions that entirely ignore potential environmental shifts, our sampling approach remains highly robust in comparison to standard RL algorithms. Parameswaran Kamalaruban, Yu-Ting Huang 0003, Ya-Ping Hsieh, Paul Rolland, Volkan Cevher |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2019 | Efficient learning of smooth probability functions from Bernoulli tests with guaranteesabstractWe study the fundamental problem of learning an unknown, smooth probability function via point-wise Bernoulli tests. We provide a scalable algorithm for efficiently solving this problem with rigorous guarantees. In particular, we prove the convergence rate of our posterior update rule to the true probability function in L2-norm. Moreover, we allow the Bernoulli tests to depend on contextual features, and provide a modified inference engine with provable guarantees for this novel setting. Numerical results show that the empirical convergence rates match the theory, and illustrate the superiority of our approach in handling contextual features over the state-of-the-art. Paul Rolland, Ali Kavis, Alexander Immer, Adish Singla, Volkan Cevher |
ICML | 1 |
| 2018 | High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization via Additive Models with Overlapping GroupsabstractBayesian optimization (BO) is a popular technique for sequential black-box function optimization, with applications including parameter tuning, robotics, environmental monitoring, and more. One of the most important challenges in BO is the development of algorithms that scale to high dimensions, which remains a key open problem despite recent progress. In this paper, we consider the approach of Kandasamy et al. (2015), in which the high-dimensional function decomposes as a sum of lower-dimensional functions on subsets of the underlying variables. In particular, we significantly generalize this approach by lifting the assumption that the subsets are disjoint, and consider additive models with arbitrary overlap among the subsets. By representing the dependencies via a graph, we deduce an efficient message passing algorithm for optimizing the acquisition function. In addition, we provide an algorithm for learning the graph from samples based on Gibbs sampling. We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods on both synthetic and real-world data. Paul Rolland, Jonathan Scarlett, Ilija Bogunovic, Volkan Cevher |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2018 | Mirrored Langevin DynamicsabstractWe consider the problem of sampling from constrained distributions, which has posed significant challenges to both non-asymptotic analysis and algorithmic design. We propose a unified framework, which is inspired by the classical mirror descent, to derive novel first-order sampling schemes. We prove that, for a general target distribution with strongly convex potential, our framework implies the existence of a first-order algorithm achieving O~(\epsilon^{-2}d) convergence, suggesting that the state-of-the-art O~(\epsilon^{-6}d^5) can be vastly improved. With the important Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) application in mind, we specialize our algorithm to sample from Dirichlet posteriors, and derive the first non-asymptotic O~(\epsilon^{-2}d^2) rate for first-order sampling. We further extend our framework to the mini-batch setting and prove convergence rates when only stochastic gradients are available. Finally, we report promising experimental results for LDA on real datasets. Ya-Ping Hsieh, Ali Kavis, Paul Rolland, Volkan Cevher |
NeurIPS | 3 |