Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Léonard Blier
dblp:215/4366
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 70% Learning theory · 15% Efficient and distributed learning · 15% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning › q-learning
continuous-time q-learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Making Deep Q-learning methods robust to time discretization · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Making Deep Q-learning methods robust to time discretization · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
q-learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Making Deep Q-learning methods robust to time discretization · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
robust reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Making Deep Q-learning methods robust to time discretization · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › model selection
minimum description length |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | The Description Length of Deep Learning models · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | The Description Length of Deep Learning models · NeurIPS 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
off-policy reinforcement learning · 0.4deep q-learning · 0.4deep deterministic policy gradient · 0.4variational inference · 0.3minimum description length · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Making Deep Q-learning methods robust to time discretizationabstractDespite remarkable successes, Deep Reinforce- ment Learning (DRL) is not robust to hyperparam- eterization, implementation details, or small envi- ronment changes (Henderson et al. 2017, Zhang et al. 2018). Overcoming such sensitivity is key to making DRL applicable to real world problems. In this paper, we identify sensitivity to time dis- cretization in near continuous-time environments as a critical factor; this covers, e.g., changing the number of frames per second, or the action frequency of the controller. Empirically, we find that Q-learning-based approaches such as Deep Q- learning (Mnih et al., 2015) and Deep Determinis- tic Policy Gradient (Lillicrap et al., 2015) collapse with small time steps. Formally, we prove that Q-learning does not exist in continuous time. We detail a principled way to build an off-policy RL algorithm that yields similar performances over a wide range of time discretizations, and confirm this robustness empirically. Corentin Tallec, Léonard Blier, Yann Ollivier |
ICML | 2 |
| 2019 | Learning with Random Learning Rates
Léonard Blier, Pierre Wolinski, Yann Ollivier |
ECML/PKDD (2) | 1 |
| 2018 | The Description Length of Deep Learning modelsabstractDeep learning models often have more parameters than observations, and still perform well. This is sometimes described as a paradox. In this work, we show experimentally that despite their huge number of parameters, deep neural networks can compress the data losslessly even when taking the cost of encoding the parameters into account. Such a compression viewpoint originally motivated the use of variational methods in neural networks. However, we show that these variational methods provide surprisingly poor compression bounds, despite being explicitly built to minimize such bounds. This might explain the relatively poor practical performance of variational methods in deep learning. Better encoding methods, imported from the Minimum Description Length (MDL) toolbox, yield much better compression values on deep networks. Léonard Blier, Yann Ollivier |
NeurIPS | 1 |