EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Antoine Maillard
dblp:215/5029
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-1078-4553ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Learning theory · 59% Deep learning architectures and training · 11% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 9% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 29% Information theory · 23% Computational geometry · 16% |
Topics — the 24 heaviest of 27, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional statistics |
1.3 | 2 | 2025 | Fundamental Limits of Matrix Sensing: Exact Asymptotics, Universality, and Applications · COLT 2025 Phase retrieval in high dimensions: Statistical and computational phase transitions · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional statistics › matrix estimation
spiked matrix model |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | The Spiked Matrix Model With Generative Priors · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021 The spiked matrix model with generative priors · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory
asymptotic analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fundamental Limits of Matrix Sensing: Exact Asymptotics, Universality, and Applications · COLT 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › low-rank optimization
matrix sensing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fundamental Limits of Matrix Sensing: Exact Asymptotics, Universality, and Applications · COLT 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Fundamental Limits of Matrix Sensing: Exact Asymptotics, Universality, and Applications · COLT 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
neural network theory |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Bayes-optimal learning of an extensive-width neural network from quadratically many samples · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › overparameterized neural network
wide neural networks |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Bayes-optimal learning of an extensive-width neural network from quadratically many samples · NeurIPS 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Fitting an Ellipsoid to Random Points: Predictions Using the Replica Method · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Computational geometry › geometric modeling and processing › point cloud analysis › geometric reconstruction
ellipsoid fitting |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Fitting an Ellipsoid to Random Points: Predictions Using the Replica Method · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Information theory
replica method |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Fitting an Ellipsoid to Random Points: Predictions Using the Replica Method · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics
statistical physics models |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Fitting an Ellipsoid to Random Points: Predictions Using the Replica Method · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative prior |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The Spiked Matrix Model With Generative Priors · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical estimation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | The Spiked Matrix Model With Generative Priors · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
phase retrieval |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Phase retrieval in high dimensions: Statistical and computational phase transitions · NeurIPS 2020 |
Computational complexity
statistical-computational gaps |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Phase retrieval in high dimensions: Statistical and computational phase transitions · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
statistical inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | The spiked matrix model with generative priors · NeurIPS 2019 |
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
approximate message passing |
0.4 | 2 | 2024 | Bayes-optimal learning of an extensive-width neural network from quadratically many samples · NeurIPS 2024 Phase retrieval in high dimensions: Statistical and computational phase transitions · NeurIPS 2020 |
Distributed computing theory
message passing |
0.4 | 2 | 2024 | Bayes-optimal learning of an extensive-width neural network from quadratically many samples · NeurIPS 2024 Phase retrieval in high dimensions: Statistical and computational phase transitions · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › model ensemble
committee machine |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | The committee machine: Computational to statistical gaps in learning a two-layers neural network · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization error |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | The committee machine: Computational to statistical gaps in learning a two-layers neural network · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
two-layer neural network training |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | The committee machine: Computational to statistical gaps in learning a two-layers neural network · NeurIPS 2018 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › norm optimization
nuclear norm minimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Fitting an Ellipsoid to Random Points: Predictions Using the Replica Method · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
message passing |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | The Spiked Matrix Model With Generative Priors · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
spectral methods |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | The Spiked Matrix Model With Generative Priors · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
approximate message passing · 3.1random matrix theory · 2.0rotationally invariant matrix denoising · 1.5gradient descent · 1.5replica method · 1.2matrix denoising · 0.9generalized linear model analysis · 0.9gaussian equivalence · 0.9HCIZ integral · 0.8spectral methods · 0.5message passing · 0.5bayes-optimal estimator · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Fundamental Limits of Matrix Sensing: Exact Asymptotics, Universality, and ApplicationsabstractIn the matrix sensing problem, one wishes to reconstruct a matrix from (possibly noisy) observations of its linear projections along given directions. We consider this model in the high-dimensional limit: while previous works on this model primarily focused on the recovery of low-rank matrices, we consider in this work more general classes of structured signal matrices with potentially large rank, e.g. a product of two matrices of sizes proportional to the dimension. We provide rigorous asymptotic equations characterizing the Bayes-optimal learning performance from a number of samples which is proportional to the number of entries in the matrix. Our proof is composed of three key ingredients: $(i)$ we prove universality properties to handle structured sensing matrices, related to the “Gaussian equivalence” phenomenon in statistical learning, $(ii)$ we provide a sharp characterization of Bayes-optimal learning in generalized linear models with Gaussian data and structured matrix priors, generalizing previously studied settings, and $(iii)$ we leverage previous works on the problem of matrix denoising. The generality of our results allow for a variety of applications: notably, we mathematically establish predictions obtained via non-rigorous methods from statistical physics in Erba et al. (2024) regarding Bilinear Sequence Regression, a benchmark model for learning from sequences of tokens, and in Maillard et al. (2024) on Bayes-optimal learning in neural networks with quadratic activation function, and width proportional to the dimension. Antoine Maillard, Lenka Zdeborová, Florent Krzakala |
COLT | 2 |
| 2024 | Bayes-optimal learning of an extensive-width neural network from quadratically many samplesabstractWe consider the problem of learning a target function corresponding to a single
hidden layer neural network, with a quadratic activation function after the first layer,
and random weights. We consider the asymptotic limit where the input dimension
and the network width are proportionally large. Recent work [Cui et al., 2023]
established that linear regression provides Bayes-optimal test error to learn such
a function when the number of available samples is only linear in the dimension.
That work stressed the open challenge of theoretically analyzing the optimal test
error in the more interesting regime where the number of samples is quadratic in
the dimension. In this paper, we solve this challenge for quadratic activations and
derive a closed-form expression for the Bayes-optimal test error. We also provide an
algorithm, that we call GAMP-RIE, which combines approximate message passing
with rotationally invariant matrix denoising, and that asymptotically achieves the
optimal performance. Technically, our result is enabled by establishing a link
with recent works on optimal denoising of extensive-rank matrices and on the
ellipsoid fitting problem. We further show empirically that, in the absence of
noise, randomly-initialized gradient descent seems to sample the space of weights,
leading to zero training loss, and averaging over initialization leads to a test error
equal to the Bayes-optimal one. Antoine Maillard, Emanuele Troiani, Simon Martin 0008, Florent Krzakala, Lenka Zdeborová |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Fitting an Ellipsoid to Random Points: Predictions Using the Replica MethodabstractWe consider the problem of fitting a centered ellipsoid to n standard Gaussian random vectors in${\mathbb {R}} ^{d}$, as$n, d \to \infty $with$n/d^{2} \to \alpha \gt 0$. It has been conjectured that this problem is, with high probability, satisfiable (SAT; that is, there exists an ellipsoid passing through all n points) for$\alpha \lt 1/4$, and unsatisfiable (UNSAT) for$\alpha \gt 1/4$. In this work we give a precise analytical argument, based on the non-rigorous replica method of statistical physics, that indeed predicts a SAT/UNSAT transition at$\alpha = 1/4$, as well as the shape of a typical fitting ellipsoid in the SAT phase (i.e., the lengths of its principal axes). Besides the replica method, our main tool is the dilute limit of extensive-rank “HCIZ integrals” of random matrix theory. We further study different explicit algorithmic constructions of the matrix characterizing the ellipsoid. In particular, we show that a procedure based on minimizing its nuclear norm yields a solution in the whole SAT phase. Finally, we characterize the SAT/UNSAT transition for ellipsoid fitting of a large class of rotationally-invariant random vectors. Our work suggests mathematically rigorous ways to analyze fitting ellipsoids to random vectors, which is the topic of a companion work. Antoine Maillard, Dmitriy Kunisky |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2021 | The Spiked Matrix Model With Generative PriorsabstractWe investigate the statistical and algorithmic properties of random neural-network generative priors in a simple inference problem: spiked-matrix estimation. We establish a rigorous expression for the performance of the Bayes-optimal estimator in the high-dimensional regime, and identify the statistical threshold for weak-recovery of the spike. Next, we derive a message-passing algorithm taking into account the latent structure of the spike, and show that its performance is asymptotically optimal for natural choices of the generative network architecture. The absence of an algorithmic gap in this case is in stark contrast to known results for sparse spikes, another popular prior for modelling low-dimensional signals, and for which no algorithm is known to achieve the optimal statistical threshold. Finally, we show that linearising our message passing algorithm yields a simple spectral method also achieving the optimal threshold for reconstruction. We conclude with an experiment on a real data set showing that our bespoke spectral method outperforms vanilla PCA. Benjamin Aubin, Bruno Loureiro, Antoine Maillard, Florent Krzakala, Lenka Zdeborová |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 3 |
| 2020 | Phase retrieval in high dimensions: Statistical and computational phase transitionsabstractWe consider the phase retrieval problem of reconstructing a $n$-dimensional real or complex signal $\mathbf{X}^\star$ from $m$ (possibly noisy) observations $Y_\mu = | \sum_{i=1}^n \Phi_{\mu i} X^{\star}_i/\sqrt{n}|$, for a large class of correlated real and complex random sensing matrices $\mathbf{\Phi}$, in a high-dimensional setting where $m,n\to\infty$ while $\alpha = m/n=\Theta(1)$. First, we derive sharp asymptotics for the lowest possible estimation error achievable statistically and we unveil the existence of sharp phase transitions for the weak- and full-recovery thresholds as a function of the singular values of the matrix $\mathbf{\Phi}$. This is achieved by providing a rigorous proof of a result first obtained by the replica method from statistical mechanics. In particular, the information-theoretic transition to perfect recovery for full-rank matrices appears at $\alpha=1$ (real case) and $\alpha=2$ (complex case). Secondly, we analyze the performance of the best-known polynomial time algorithm for this problem --- approximate message-passing--- establishing the existence of statistical-to-algorithmic gap depending, again, on the spectral properties of $\mathbf{\Phi}$. Our work provides an extensive classification of the statistical and algorithmic thresholds in high-dimensional phase retrieval for a broad class of random matrices. Antoine Maillard, Bruno Loureiro, Florent Krzakala, Lenka Zdeborová |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | The spiked matrix model with generative priorsabstractUsing a low-dimensional parametrization of signals is a generic and powerful way to enhance performance in signal processing and statistical inference. A very popular and widely explored type of dimensionality reduction is sparsity; another type is generative modelling of signal distributions. Generative models based on neural networks, such as GANs or variational auto-encoders, are particularly performant and are gaining on applicability. In this paper we study spiked matrix models, where a low-rank matrix is observed through a noisy channel. This problem with sparse structure of the spikes has attracted broad attention in the past literature. Here, we replace the sparsity assumption by generative modelling, and investigate the consequences on statistical and algorithmic properties. We analyze the Bayes-optimal performance under specific generative models for the spike. In contrast with the sparsity assumption, we do not observe regions of parameters where statistical performance is superior to the best known algorithmic performance. We show that in the analyzed cases the approximate message passing algorithm is able to reach optimal performance. We also design enhanced spectral algorithms and analyze their performance and thresholds using random matrix theory, showing their superiority to the classical principal component analysis. We complement our theoretical results by illustrating the performance of the spectral algorithms when the spikes come from real datasets. Benjamin Aubin, Bruno Loureiro, Antoine Maillard, Florent Krzakala, Lenka Zdeborová |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2018 | The Mutual Information in Random Linear Estimation Beyond i.i.d. MatricesabstractThere has been definite progress recently in proving the variational single-letter formula given by the heuristic replica method for various estimation problems. In particular, the replica formula for the mutual information in the case of noisy linear estimation with random i.i.d. matrices, a problem with applications ranging from compressed sensing to statistics, has been proven rigorously. In this contribution we go beyond the restrictive i.i.d. matrix assumption and discuss the formula proposed by Takeda, Uda, Kabashima and later by Tulino, Verdu, Caire and Shamai who used the replica method. Using the recently introduced adaptive interpolation method and random matrix theory, we prove this formula for a relevant large sub-class of rotationally invariant matrices. Jean Barbier, Nicolas Macris, Antoine Maillard, Florent Krzakala |
ISIT | 3 |
| 2018 | The committee machine: Computational to statistical gaps in learning a two-layers neural networkabstractHeuristic tools from statistical physics have been used in the past to compute the optimal learning and generalization errors in the teacher-student scenario in multi- layer neural networks. In this contribution, we provide a rigorous justification of these approaches for a two-layers neural network model called the committee machine. We also introduce a version of the approximate message passing (AMP) algorithm for the committee machine that allows to perform optimal learning in polynomial time for a large set of parameters. We find that there are regimes in which a low generalization error is information-theoretically achievable while the AMP algorithm fails to deliver it; strongly suggesting that no efficient algorithm exists for those cases, and unveiling a large computational gap. Benjamin Aubin, Antoine Maillard, Jean Barbier, Florent Krzakala, Nicolas Macris, Lenka Zdeborová |
NeurIPS | 2 |