Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Blaz Repas
dblp:215/5271
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Wireless sensing and localization · 44% Physical-layer communications · 44% Internet of things and sensor networks · 13% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical-layer communications
signal processing for communications |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Nanosecond-precision time-of-arrival estimation for aircraft signals with low-cost SDR receivers · IPSN 2018 |
Wireless sensing and localization › ranging
time-of-arrival estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Nanosecond-precision time-of-arrival estimation for aircraft signals with low-cost SDR receivers · IPSN 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
template matching · 0.3cross-correlation · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Nanosecond-precision time-of-arrival estimation for aircraft signals with low-cost SDR receiversabstractPrecise Time-of-Arrival (TOA) estimations of aircraft and drone signals are important for a wide set of applications including aircraft/drone tracking, air traffic data verification, or self-localization. Our focus in this work is on TOA estimation methods that can run on low-cost software-defined radio (SDR) receivers, as widely deployed in Mode S / ADS-B crowdsourced sensor networks such as the OpenSky Network. We evaluate experimentally classical TOA estimation methods which are based on a cross-correlation with a reconstructed message template and find that these methods are not optimal for such signals. We propose two alternative methods that provide superior results for real-world Mode S / ADS-B signals captured with low-cost SDR receivers. The best method achieves a standard deviation error of 1.5 ns. Roberto Calvo-Palomino, Fabio Ricciato, Blaz Repas, Domenico Giustiniano, Vincent Lenders |
IPSN | 3 |