Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Siddhant M. Jayakumar
dblp:215/5448
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 39% Deep learning architectures and training · 25% Reinforcement learning · 18% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Powerpropagation: A sparsity inducing weight reparameterisation · NeurIPS 2021 Top-KAST: Top-K Always Sparse Training · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
sparse training |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Powerpropagation: A sparsity inducing weight reparameterisation · NeurIPS 2021 Top-KAST: Top-K Always Sparse Training · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.9 | 2 | 2020 | Stabilizing Transformers for Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2020 Compressive Transformers for Long-Range Sequence Modelling · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Powerpropagation: A sparsity inducing weight reparameterisation · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Stabilizing Transformers for Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › sparsity
dynamic sparsity |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Top-KAST: Top-K Always Sparse Training · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling
long sequence modeling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Compressive Transformers for Long-Range Sequence Modelling · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feature interaction
multiplicative interaction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Multiplicative Interactions and Where to Find Them · ICLR 2020 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
information asymmetry |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Information asymmetry in KL-regularized RL · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
KL-regularized RL |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Information asymmetry in KL-regularized RL · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
curriculum learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Mix & Match Agent Curricula for Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › meta-learning
memory-based meta-learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Been There, Done That: Meta-Learning with Episodic Recall · ICML 2018 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › adaptive control
parameter adaptation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Memory-based Parameter Adaptation · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation › representation learning for reinforcement learning
policy representation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Mix & Match Agent Curricula for Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward design
reward shaping |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Information asymmetry in KL-regularized RL · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-task reinforcement learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Mix & Match Agent Curricula for Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
LSTM · 0.8weight reparameterization · 0.5gradient descent · 0.5transformer · 0.4sparse gradient training · 0.4self-attention · 0.4multiplicative interactions · 0.4magnitude pruning · 0.4gated transformer · 0.4attention · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Powerpropagation: A sparsity inducing weight reparameterisationabstractThe training of sparse neural networks is becoming an increasingly important tool for reducing the computational footprint of models at training and evaluation, as well enabling the effective scaling up of models. Whereas much work over the years has been dedicated to specialised pruning techniques, little attention has been paid to the inherent effect of gradient based training on model sparsity. Inthis work, we introduce Powerpropagation, a new weight-parameterisation for neural networks that leads to inherently sparse models. Exploiting the behaviour of gradient descent, our method gives rise to weight updates exhibiting a “rich get richer” dynamic, leaving low-magnitude parameters largely unaffected by learning. Models trained in this manner exhibit similar performance, but have a distributionwith markedly higher density at zero, allowing more parameters to be pruned safely. Powerpropagation is general, intuitive, cheap and straight-forward to implement and can readily be combined with various other techniques. To highlight its versatility, we explore it in two very different settings: Firstly, following a recent line of work, we investigate its effect on sparse training for resource-constrained settings. Here, we combine Powerpropagation with a traditional weight-pruning technique as well as recent state-of-the-art sparse-to-sparse algorithms, showing superior performance on the ImageNet benchmark. Secondly, we advocate the useof sparsity in overcoming catastrophic forgetting, where compressed representations allow accommodating a large number of tasks at fixed model capacity. In all cases our reparameterisation considerably increases the efficacy of the off-the-shelf methods. Jonathan Schwarz, Siddhant M. Jayakumar, Razvan Pascanu, Peter E. Latham, Yee Whye Teh |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2020 | Multiplicative Interactions and Where to Find Them
Siddhant M. Jayakumar, Wojciech Czarnecki 0001, Jacob Menick, Jonathan Schwarz, Jack W. Rae, Simon Osindero, Yee Whye Teh, Tim Harley, Razvan Pascanu |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2020 | Compressive Transformers for Long-Range Sequence Modelling
Jack W. Rae, Anna Potapenko, Siddhant M. Jayakumar, Chloe Hillier, Timothy P. Lillicrap |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2020 | Stabilizing Transformers for Reinforcement LearningabstractOwing to their ability to both effectively integrate information over long time horizons and scale to massive amounts of data, self-attention architectures have recently shown breakthrough success in natural language processing (NLP). Harnessing the transformer’s ability to process long time horizons of information could provide a similar performance boost in partially observable reinforcement learning (RL) domains, but the large-scale transformers used in NLP have yet to be successfully applied to the RL setting. In this work we demonstrate that the standard transformer architecture is difficult to optimize, which was previously observed in the supervised learning setting but becomes especially pronounced with RL objectives. We propose architectural modifications that substantially improve the stability and learning speed of the original Transformer and XL variant. The proposed architecture, the Gated Transformer-XL (GTrXL), surpasses LSTMs on challenging memory environments and achieves state-of-the-art results on the multi-task DMLab-30 benchmark suite, exceeding the performance of an external memory architecture. We show that the GTrXL has stability and performance that consistently matches or exceeds a competitive LSTM baseline, including on more reactive tasks where memory is less critical. Emilio Parisotto, H. Francis Song, Jack W. Rae, Razvan Pascanu, Caglar Gulcehre, Siddhant M. Jayakumar, Max Jaderberg, Raphael Lopez Kaufman, Aidan Clark, Seb Noury, Matt M. Botvinick, Nicolas Heess, Raia Hadsell |
ICML | 6 |
| 2020 | Top-KAST: Top-K Always Sparse TrainingabstractSparse neural networks are becoming increasingly important as the field seeks to improve the performance of existing models by scaling them up, while simultaneously trying to reduce power consumption and computational footprint. Unfortunately, most existing methods for inducing performant sparse models still entail the instantiation of dense parameters, or dense gradients in the backward-pass, during training. For very large models this requirement can be prohibitive. In this work we propose Top-KAST, a method that preserves constant sparsity throughout training (in both the forward and backward-passes). We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach by showing that it performs comparably to or better than previous works when training models on the established ImageNet benchmark, whilst fully maintaining sparsity. In addition to our ImageNet results, we also demonstrate our approach in the domain of language modeling where the current best performing architectures tend to have tens of billions of parameters and scaling up does not yet seem to have saturated performance. Sparse versions of these architectures can be run with significantly fewer resources, making them more widely accessible and applicable. Furthermore, in addition to being effective, our approach is straightforward and can easily be implemented in a wide range of existing machine learning frameworks with only a few additional lines of code. We therefore hope that our contribution will help enable the broader community to explore the potential held by massive models, without incurring massive computational cost. Siddhant M. Jayakumar, Razvan Pascanu, Jack W. Rae, Simon Osindero, Erich Elsen |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2019 | Distilling Policy DistillationabstractThe transfer of knowledge from one policy to another is an important tool in Deep Reinforcement Learning. This process, referred to as distillation, has been used to great success, for example, by enhancing the optimisation of agents, leading to stronger performance faster, on harder domains. Despite the widespread use and conceptual simplicity of distillation, many different formulations are used in practice, and the subtle variations between them can often drastically change the performance and the resulting objective that is being optimised. In this work, we rigorously explore the entire landscape of policy distillation, comparing the motivations and strengths of each variant through theoretical and empirical analysis. Our results point to three distillation techniques, that are preferred depending on specifics of the task. Specifically a newly proposed expected entropy regularised distillation allows for quicker learning in a wide range of situations, while still guaranteeing convergence. Wojciech Czarnecki 0001, Razvan Pascanu, Simon Osindero, Siddhant M. Jayakumar, Grzegorz Swirszcz, Max Jaderberg |
AISTATS | 4 |
| 2019 | Information asymmetry in KL-regularized RL
Alexandre Galashov, Siddhant M. Jayakumar, Leonard Hasenclever, Dhruva Tirumala, Jonathan Schwarz, Guillaume Desjardins, Wojciech Czarnecki 0001, Yee Whye Teh, Razvan Pascanu, Nicolas Heess |
ICLR (Poster) | 2 |
| 2018 | Memory-based Parameter Adaptation
Pablo Sprechmann, Siddhant M. Jayakumar, Jack W. Rae, Alexander Pritzel, Adrià Puigdomènech Badia, Benigno Uria, Oriol Vinyals, Demis Hassabis, Razvan Pascanu, Charles Blundell |
ICLR (Poster) | 2 |
| 2018 | Mix & Match Agent Curricula for Reinforcement LearningabstractWe introduce Mix and match (M&M) – a training framework designed to facilitate rapid and effective learning in RL agents that would be too slow or too challenging to train otherwise.The key innovation is a procedure that allows us to automatically form a curriculum over agents. Through such a curriculum we can progressively train more complex agents by, effectively, bootstrapping from solutions found by simpler agents.In contradistinction to typical curriculum learning approaches, we do not gradually modify the tasks or environments presented, but instead use a process to gradually alter how the policy is represented internally.We show the broad applicability of our method by demonstrating significant performance gains in three different experimental setups: (1) We train an agent able to control more than 700 actions in a challenging 3D first-person task; using our method to progress through an action-space curriculum we achieve both faster training and better final performance than one obtains using traditional methods.(2) We further show that M&M can be used successfully to progress through a curriculum of architectural variants defining an agents internal state. (3) Finally, we illustrate how a variant of our method can be used to improve agent performance in a multitask setting. Wojciech Czarnecki 0001, Siddhant M. Jayakumar, Max Jaderberg, Leonard Hasenclever, Yee Whye Teh, Nicolas Heess, Simon Osindero, Razvan Pascanu |
ICML | 2 |
| 2018 | Been There, Done That: Meta-Learning with Episodic RecallabstractMeta-learning agents excel at rapidly learning new tasks from open-ended task distributions; yet, they forget what they learn about each task as soon as the next begins. When tasks reoccur {–} as they do in natural environments {–} meta-learning agents must explore again instead of immediately exploiting previously discovered solutions. We propose a formalism for generating open-ended yet repetitious environments, then develop a meta-learning architecture for solving these environments. This architecture melds the standard LSTM working memory with a differentiable neural episodic memory. We explore the capabilities of agents with this episodic LSTM in five meta-learning environments with reoccurring tasks, ranging from bandits to navigation and stochastic sequential decision problems. Samuel Ritter, Jane X. Wang, Zeb Kurth-Nelson, Siddhant M. Jayakumar, Charles Blundell, Razvan Pascanu, Matt M. Botvinick |
ICML | 4 |