Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jinghong Lin

dblp:215/5549 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 39% Information extraction and text analysis · 30% Graph learning · 30%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 38% Knowledge graphs · 38% Information retrieval · 23%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition › knowledge extraction
concept extraction
0.412019
A User-Centered Concept Mining System for Query and Document Understanding at Tencent · KDD 2019
Data mining › text mining › information extraction
concept mining
0.412019
A User-Centered Concept Mining System for Query and Document Understanding at Tencent · KDD 2019
Knowledge graphs
taxonomy construction
0.412019
A User-Centered Concept Mining System for Query and Document Understanding at Tencent · KDD 2019
Information retrieval › query understanding
query analysis
0.112019
A User-Centered Concept Mining System for Query and Document Understanding at Tencent · KDD 2019
Information retrieval
query understanding
0.112019
A User-Centered Concept Mining System for Query and Document Understanding at Tencent · KDD 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

concept mining · 0.8graph convolutional network · 0.4concept interaction graph · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Matching Article Pairs with Graphical Decomposition and Convolutions
abstract
Identifying the relationship between two articles, e.g., whether two articles published from different sources describe the same breaking news, is critical to many document understanding tasks.Existing approaches for modeling and matching sentence pairs do not perform well in matching longer documents, which embody more complex interactions between the enclosed entities than a sentence does.To model article pairs, we propose the Concept Interaction Graph to represent an article as a graph of concepts.We then match a pair of articles by comparing the sentences that enclose the same concept vertex through a series of encoding techniques, and aggregate the matching signals through a graph convolutional network.To facilitate the evaluation of long article matching, we have created two datasets, each consisting of about 30K pairs of breaking news articles covering diverse topics in the open domain.Extensive evaluations of the proposed methods on the two datasets demonstrate significant improvements over a wide range of state-of-the-art methods for natural language matching.
Bang Liu 0003, Di Niu 0002, Haojie Wei, Jinghong Lin, Yancheng He, Kunfeng Lai
ACL (1)4
2019 A User-Centered Concept Mining System for Query and Document Understanding at Tencent
abstract
Concepts embody the knowledge of the world and facilitate the cognitive processes of human beings. Mining concepts from web documents and constructing the corresponding taxonomy are core research problems in text understanding and support many downstream tasks such as query analysis, knowledge base construction, recommendation, and search. However, we argue that most prior studies extract formal and overly general concepts from Wikipedia or static web pages, which are not representing the user perspective.
Bang Liu 0003, Weidong Guo, Di Niu 0002, Shunnan Xu, Jinghong Lin, Kunfeng Lai
KDD6