Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eric Mayeul O. Fafolahan

dblp:215/6377 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-8945-7597ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Cellular and mobile networks · 80% Internet architecture and protocols · 15% Wireless networking · 4%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cellular and mobile networks
5g
0.412020
A Seamless Mobility Management Protocol in 5G Locator Identificator Split Dense Small Cells · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2020
Cellular and mobile networks › mobility management
distributed mobility management
0.412020
A Seamless Mobility Management Protocol in 5G Locator Identificator Split Dense Small Cells · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2020
Cellular and mobile networks › mobility management
handover optimization
0.412020
A Seamless Mobility Management Protocol in 5G Locator Identificator Split Dense Small Cells · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2020
Internet architecture and protocols › naming and addressing
locator/identifier separation
0.412020
A Seamless Mobility Management Protocol in 5G Locator Identificator Split Dense Small Cells · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2020
Cellular and mobile networks
mobility management
0.412020
A Seamless Mobility Management Protocol in 5G Locator Identificator Split Dense Small Cells · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2020
Cellular and mobile networks › heterogeneous networks
small cells
0.412020
A Seamless Mobility Management Protocol in 5G Locator Identificator Split Dense Small Cells · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2020
Wireless networking › network deployment
network densification
0.112020
A Seamless Mobility Management Protocol in 5G Locator Identificator Split Dense Small Cells · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2020
Cellular and mobile networks
signaling overhead reduction
0.112020
A Seamless Mobility Management Protocol in 5G Locator Identificator Split Dense Small Cells · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.4analytical modeling · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 A Seamless Mobility Management Protocol in 5G Locator Identificator Split Dense Small Cells
abstract
Network densification with Small Cells (SCs) has emerged as a key technique to increase the 5G network capacity. However, in a densified network, fast mobile nodes will experience frequent handovers with a high signaling load, handover latency, and packet loss, due to the short cell radius. Indeed, Distributed Mobility Management (DMM) protocols aim to solve the shortcomings of centralized mobility management solutions such as poor scalability and non-optimal routing. However, when the cell residence time is short, DMM protocols might suffer from increased costs and limited performance. This paper proposes a localized mobility management protocol in 5G dense SCs, based on the locator identifier separation protocol, local mobility anchoring, and fast handovers concepts. The proposed scheme divides a local domain into several location service areas, each controlled by a local anchor. We provide the analytical models of several handover metrics, namely the average total signaling cost, the data delivery cost, the handover latency, and the packet loss. Numerical and simulation results show significant cost savings, up to 30 percent in signaling overhead, up to 53 percent of packet loss, and up to 90 percent of processing load reduction at the core of the network compared to the existing lisp mobile node protocol.
Eric Mayeul O. Fafolahan, Samuel Pierre
IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput.1