Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Paritosh Bahirat

dblp:215/6510 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Usable security · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › privacy
privacy decision-making
0.512021
Overlooking Context: How do Defaults and Framing Reduce Deliberation in Smart Home Privacy Decision-Making? · CHI 2021
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › smart home
smart home privacy
0.512021
Overlooking Context: How do Defaults and Framing Reduce Deliberation in Smart Home Privacy Decision-Making? · CHI 2021
Usable security › usable privacy
privacy nudges
0.112021
Overlooking Context: How do Defaults and Framing Reduce Deliberation in Smart Home Privacy Decision-Making? · CHI 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

scenario-based study · 1.0cognitive appraisal analysis · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Overlooking Context: How do Defaults and Framing Reduce Deliberation in Smart Home Privacy Decision-Making?
abstract
Research has demonstrated that users’ heuristic decision-making processes cause external factors like defaults and framing to influence the outcome of privacy decisions. Proponents of “privacy nudging” have proposed leveraging these effects to guide users’ decisions. Our research shows that defaults and framing not only influence the outcome of privacy decisions, but also the process of evaluating the contextual factors associated with the decision, effectively making the decision-making process more heuristic. In our analysis of an existing dataset of scenario-based smart home privacy decisions, we demonstrate that defaults and framing not only have a direct effect on participants’ decisions; they also moderate the effect of their cognitive appraisals of the presented scenarios on the decision. These results suggest that nudges like defaults and framing exacerbate the well-researched problem that people often employ heuristics rather than making deliberate privacy decisions, and that privacy-setting interfaces should avoid the effects of heuristic decision-making.
Paritosh Bahirat, Martijn C. Willemsen, Yangyang He, Qizhang Sun, Bart P. Knijnenburg
CHI1
2020 Privacy at a Glance: The User-Centric Design of Glanceable Data Exposure Visualizations
abstract
Abstract Smartphone users are often unaware of mobile applications’ (“apps”) third-party data collection and sharing practices, which put them at higher risk of privacy breaches. One way to raise awareness of these practices is by providing unobtrusive but pervasive visualizations that can be presented in a glanceable manner. In this paper, we applied Wogalter et al.’s Communication-Human Information Processing model (C-HIP) to design and prototype eight different visualizations that depict smartphone apps’ data sharing activities. We varied the granularity and type (i.e., data-centric or app-centric) of information shown to users and used the screensaver/lock screen as a design probe. Through interview-based design probes with Android users (n=15), we investigated the aspects of the data exposure visualizations that influenced users’ comprehension and privacy awareness. Our results shed light on how users’ perceptions of privacy boundaries influence their preference regarding the information structure of these visualizations, and the tensions that exist in these visualizations between glanceability and granularity. We discuss how a pervasive, soft paternalistic approach to privacy-related visualization may raise awareness by enhancing the transparency of information flow, thereby, unobtrusively increasing users’ understanding of data sharing practices of mobile apps. We also discuss implications for privacy research and glanceable security.
Daricia Wilkinson, Paritosh Bahirat, Moses Namara, Jing Lyu, Arwa Alsubhi, Jessica Qiu, Pamela J. Wisniewski, Bart P. Knijnenburg
Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol.2
2020 A Data-Driven Approach to Designing for Privacy in Household IoT
abstract
In this article, we extend and improve upon a previously developed data-driven approach to design privacy-setting interfaces for users of household IoT devices. The essence of this approach is to gather users’ feedback on household IoT scenarios before developing the interface, which allows us to create a navigational structure that preemptively maximizes users’ efficiency in expressing their privacy preferences, and develop a series of ‘privacy profiles’ that allow users to express a complex set of privacy preferences with the single click of a button. We expand upon the existing approach by proposing a more sophisticated translation of statistical results into interface design, and by extensively discussing and analyzing the tradeoff between user-model parsimony and accuracy in developing privacy profiles and default settings.
Yangyang He, Paritosh Bahirat, Bart P. Knijnenburg, Abhilash Menon
ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst.2
2018 A Data-Driven Approach to Developing IoT Privacy-Setting Interfaces
abstract
User testing is often used to inform the development of user interfaces (UIs). But what if an interface needs to be developed for a system that does not yet exist? In that case, existing datasets can provide valuable input for UI development. We apply a data-driven approach to the development of a privacy-setting interface for Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices. Applying machine learning techniques to an existing dataset of users' sharing preferences in IoT scenarios, we develop a set of "smart" default profiles. Our resulting interface asks users to choose among these profiles, which capture their preferences with an accuracy of 82%---a 14% improvement over a naive default setting and a 12% improvement over a single smart default setting for all users.
Paritosh Bahirat, Yangyang He, Abhilash Menon, Bart P. Knijnenburg
IUI1