Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Frank Shih

dblp:216/1770 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 33% Reinforcement learning · 31% Deep learning architectures and training · 18%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
1.622025
Uncertainty Quantification for Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Extended Fiducial Inference · NeurIPS 2025
Fast Value Tracking for Deep Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
physics-informed neural network
0.912025
Uncertainty Quantification for Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Extended Fiducial Inference · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning
0.812024
Fast Value Tracking for Deep Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value function estimation
0.812024
Fast Value Tracking for Deep Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hypernetwork · 0.9dropout · 0.9bayesian inference · 0.9stochastic gradient markov chain monte carlo · 0.8langevin dynamics · 0.8kalman filtering · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Uncertainty Quantification for Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Extended Fiducial Inference
abstract
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) in scientific machine learning is increasingly critical as neural networks are widely adopted to tackle complex problems across diverse scientific disciplines. For physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), a prominent model in scientific machine learning, uncertainty is typically quantified using Bayesian or dropout methods. However, both approaches suffer from a fundamental limitation: the prior distribution or dropout rate required to construct honest confidence sets cannot be determined without additional information. In this paper, we propose a novel method within the framework of extended fiducial inference (EFI) to provide rigorous uncertainty quantification for PINNs. The proposed method leverages a narrow-neck hyper-network to learn the parameters of the PINN and quantify their uncertainty based on imputed random errors in the observations. This approach overcomes the limitations of Bayesian and dropout methods, enabling the construction of honest confidence sets based solely on observed data. This advancement represents a significant breakthrough for PINNs, greatly enhancing their reliability, interpretability, and applicability to real-world scientific and engineering challenges. Moreover, it establishes a new theoretical framework for EFI, extending its application to large-scale models, eliminating the need for sparse hyper-networks, and significantly improving the automaticity and robustness of statistical inference.
Frank Shih, Zhenghao Jiang, Faming Liang
NeurIPS1
2024 Fast Value Tracking for Deep Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) tackles sequential decision-making problems by creating agents that interacts with their environment. However, existing algorithms often view these problem as static, focusing on point estimates for model parameters to maximize expected rewards, neglecting the stochastic dynamics of agent-environment interactions and the critical role of uncertainty quantification. Our research leverages the Kalman filtering paradigm to introduce a novel and scalable sampling algorithm called Langevinized Kalman Temporal-Difference (LKTD) for deep reinforcement learning. This algorithm, grounded in Stochastic Gradient Markov Chain Monte Carlo (SGMCMC), efficiently draws samples from the posterior distribution of deep neural network parameters. Under mild conditions, we prove that the posterior samples generated by the LKTD algorithm converge to a stationary distribution. This convergence not only enables us to quantify uncertainties associated with the value function and model parameters but also allows us to monitor these uncertainties during policy updates throughout the training phase. The LKTD algorithm paves the way for more robust and adaptable reinforcement learning approaches.
Frank Shih, Faming Liang
ICLR1