Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lorraine Hudson

dblp:216/2910 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-2420-9867ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Learning and educational technologies · 33% Collaborative and social computing · 33% Design research and methods · 25%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing › online communities
communities of practice
0.412020
Co-designing Digital Tools to Enhance Speech and Language Therapy Training in Ghana · CHI 2020
Computational social science and digital humanities › political science
civic participation
0.312018
Amplifying Quiet Voices: Challenges and Opportunities for Participatory Design at an Urban Scale · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2018
Design research and methods
participatory design
0.312018
Amplifying Quiet Voices: Challenges and Opportunities for Participatory Design at an Urban Scale · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2018
Health and well-being technologies
communication disability
0.112020
Co-designing Digital Tools to Enhance Speech and Language Therapy Training in Ghana · CHI 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative analysis · 0.7participatory design · 0.7co-design · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Co-designing Digital Tools to Enhance Speech and Language Therapy Training in Ghana
abstract
Ghana has a population of over 27 million people, of which 1 in 15 may have a communication disability. The number of speech and language therapists (SLTs) available to support these people remains remarkably small, presenting a major workforce challenge. As an emerging profession, there remain significant challenges around educating the first generation of SLTs. Ghana, however, has a healthy digital infrastructure which can be taken advantage of. We describe a comprehensive study which aimed to co-design a set of locally appropriate digital tools to enhance SLT training in Ghana. We contribute insights into how digital tools could support social learning and the transition from student to independent practitioner and future clinical supervisor. We offer a set of design recommendations for creating an online Community of Practice to enhance continuing professional development.
Lorraine Hudson, Clement Amponsah, Josephine Ohenewa Bampoe, Julie Marshall, Nana Akua Victoria Owusu, Khalid Hussein, Jess Linington, Zoe Banks Gross, Jane Stokes, Roisin McNaney
CHI1
2018 Amplifying Quiet Voices: Challenges and Opportunities for Participatory Design at an Urban Scale
abstract
Many Smart City projects are beginning to consider the role of citizens. However, current methods for engaging urban populations in participatory design (PD) activities are somewhat limited. In this article, we describe an approach taken to empower socially disadvantaged citizens, using a variety of both social and technological tools, in a Smart City project. Through analysing the nature of citizens’ concerns and proposed solutions, we explore the benefits of our approach, arguing that engaging citizens can uncover hyper-local concerns that provide a foundation for finding solutions to address citizen concerns. By reflecting on our approach, we identify four key challenges to utilising PD at an urban scale; balancing scale with the personal, who has control of the process, who is participating and integrating citizen-led work with local authorities. By addressing these challenges, we will be able to truly engage citizens as collaborators in co-designing their city.
Daniel Gooch, Matthew Barker, Lorraine Hudson, Ryan Kelly 0001, Gerd Kortuem, Janet van der Linden, Marian Petre, Rebecca Brown, Anna Klis-Davies, Hannah Forbes, Jessica Mackinnon, Robbie Macpherson, Clare Walton
ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact.3