Alternative polyadenylation (APA) has been implicated to play an important role in post-transcriptional regulation by regulating mRNA abundance, stability, localization and translation, which contributes considerably to transcriptome diversity and gene expression regulation. RNA-seq has become a routine approach for transcriptome profiling, generating unprecedented data that could be used to identify and quantify APA site usage. A number of computational approaches for identifying APA sites and/or dynamic APA events from RNA-seq data have emerged in the literature, which provide valuable yet preliminary results that should be refined to yield credible guidelines for the scientific community. In this review, we provided a comprehensive overview of the status of currently available computational approaches. We also conducted objective benchmarking analysis using RNA-seq data sets from different species (human, mouse and Arabidopsis) and simulated data sets to present a systematic evaluation of 11 representative methods. Our benchmarking study showed that the overall performance of all tools investigated is moderate, reflecting that there is still lot of scope to improve the prediction of APA site or dynamic APA events from RNA-seq data. Particularly, prediction results from individual tools differ considerably, and only a limited number of predicted APA sites or genes are common among different tools. Accordingly, we attempted to give some advice on how to assess the reliability of the obtained results. We also proposed practical recommendations on the appropriate method applicable to diverse scenarios and discussed implications and future directions relevant to profiling APA from RNA-seq data.

SUMMARY: Alternative splicing (AS) is a well-established mechanism for increasing transcriptome and proteome diversity, however, detecting AS events and distinguishing among AS types in organisms without available reference genomes remains challenging. We developed a de novo approach called AStrap for AS analysis without using a reference genome. AStrap identifies AS events by extensive pair-wise alignments of transcript sequences and predicts AS types by a machine-learning model integrating more than 500 assembled features. We evaluated AStrap using collected AS events from reference genomes of rice and human as well as single-molecule real-time sequencing data from Amborella trichopoda. Results show that AStrap can identify much more AS events with comparable or higher accuracy than the competing method. AStrap also possesses a unique feature of predicting AS types, which achieves an overall accuracy of ∼0.87 for different species. Extensive evaluation of AStrap using different parameters, sample sizes and machine-learning models on different species also demonstrates the robustness and flexibility of AStrap. AStrap could be a valuable addition to the community for the study of AS in non-model organisms with limited genetic resources. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: AStrap is available for download at https://github.com/BMILAB/AStrap. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Motivation: In gene expression studies, differential expression (DE) analysis has been widely used to identify genes with shifted expression mean between groups. Recently, differential variability (DV) analysis has been increasingly applied as analyzing changed expression variability (e.g. the changes in expression variance) between groups may reveal underlying genetic heterogeneity and undetected interactions, which has great implications in many fields of biology. An easy-to-use tool for DV analysis is needed. Results: We develop AEGS for DV analysis, to identify aberrantly expressed gene sets in diseased cases but not in controls. AEGS can rank individual genes in an aberrantly expressed gene set by each gene's relative contribution to the total degree of aberrant expression, prioritizing top genes. AEGS can be used for discovering gene sets with disease-specific expression variability changes. Availability and implementation: AEGS web server is accessible at http://bmi.xmu.edu.cn:8003/AEGS, where a stand-alone AEGS application can also be downloaded. Contact: [email protected].

Summary: Alternative polyadenylation (APA) is now emerging as a widespread mechanism modulated tissue-specifically, which highlights the need to define tissue-specific poly(A) sites for profiling APA dynamics across tissues. We have developed an R package called TSAPA based on the machine learning model for identifying tissue-specific poly(A) sites in plants. A feature space including more than 200 features was assembled to specifically characterize poly(A) sites in plants. The classification model in TSAPA can be customized by selecting desirable features or classifiers. TSAPA is also capable of predicting tissue-specific poly(A) sites in unannotated intergenic regions. TSAPA will be a valuable addition to the community for studying dynamics of APA in plants. Availability and implementation: https://github.com/BMILAB/TSAPA. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.