Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Meenakshi Kansal

dblp:216/6146 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-7876-8736ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Hardware security and side channels · 70% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 30%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware security and side channels › fault attacks
differential fault analysis
0.712023
Differential Fault Attack on Rasta and $\text{FiLIP}_{\text{DSM}}$ · IEEE Trans. Computers 2023
Hardware security and side channels
fault attacks
0.712023
Differential Fault Attack on Rasta and $\text{FiLIP}_{\text{DSM}}$ · IEEE Trans. Computers 2023
Hardware security and side channels › fault attacks
fault injection attack
0.712023
Differential Fault Attack on Rasta and $\text{FiLIP}_{\text{DSM}}$ · IEEE Trans. Computers 2023
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
stream cipher cryptanalysis
0.712023
Differential Fault Attack on Rasta and $\text{FiLIP}_{\text{DSM}}$ · IEEE Trans. Computers 2023
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › homomorphic encryption
fully homomorphic encryption
0.212023
Differential Fault Attack on Rasta and $\text{FiLIP}_{\text{DSM}}$ · IEEE Trans. Computers 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

differential fault analysis · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Priority Arbiter PUF: Analysis
Meenakshi Kansal, Animesh Roy 0004, Dibyendu Roy 0001, Srinivasu Bodapati 0001, Anupam Chattopadhyay
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2023 Differential Fault Attack on Rasta and $\text{FiLIP}_{\text{DSM}}$
abstract
In this paper we propose Differential Fault Attack (DFA) on two Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) friendly stream ciphers Rasta and$\text{FiLIP}_{\text{DSM}}$. Design criteria of Rasta rely on affine layers and nonlinear layers, whereas$\text{FiLIP}_{\text{DSM}}$relies on permutations and a nonlinear filter function. Here we show that the secret key of these two ciphers can be recovered by injecting only 1 bit fault in the initial state. Our DFA on full round (# rounds$=6$) Rasta with 219 block size requires only one block (i.e., 219 bits) of normal and faulty keystream bits. In the case of our DFA on FiLIP-430 (one instance of$\text{FiLIP}_{\text{DSM}}$), we need 30000 normal and faulty keystream bits.
R. Radheshwar, Meenakshi Kansal, Pierrick Méaux, Dibyendu Roy 0001
IEEE Trans. Computers2
2022 Efficient Multi-Signature Scheme Using Lattice
abstract
Abstract With the help of a multi-signature scheme, we can reduce the cost of storage and bandwidth in case of many signers signing the same message. Therefore, multi-signature schemes can be used in bitcoin to reduce the size of a blockchain. In this paper, we propose a lattice-based multi-signature scheme with the following highlighted features. Our lattice-based multi-signature scheme supports signature compression and public key aggregation. The only existing lattice-based multi-signature scheme by Kansal and Dutta (Africacrypt, 2020) that supports both signature compression and public key aggregation has communication and storage cost $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^2)$, whereas our communication and storage cost is $\mathcal{O}(n)$. Our multi-signature scheme is in the plain public key model where the special registration of the public key is not necessary and it is secure under the rogue key attack. Our multi-signature scheme is secure under the hardness of ring short integer solution problem in the random oracle model.
Meenakshi Kansal, Ratna Dutta
Comput. J.1
2021 Lattice-based nominative signature using pseudorandom function
abstract
Abstract A nominative signature (NS) is a cryptographic primitive where two parties collude to produce a signature. It is a user certification system and has applications in a variety of sectors where nominee cannot trust heavily on the nominator to validate the nominee's certificate and only targeted entities are allowed to verify the signature on sensitive data. A new construction for NS from standard assumptions on lattice is provided. The authors’ construction relies on collision‐resistant preimage sampleable function and symmetric key primitives like collision‐resistant pseudorandom function and zero knowledge proof system ZKB ++ for Boolean circuits. The authors provide detailed security analysis and show that their construction achieves security under unforgeability , invisibility , impersonation , and non‐repudiation in the existing model. Furthermore, our construction exhibits non‐transferability . The security under non‐repudiation is achieved in the quantum random oracle model using Unruh transform to ZKB ++ .
Meenakshi Kansal, Ratna Dutta, Sourav Mukhopadhyay
IET Inf. Secur.1