Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lizhen Nie
dblp:216/9659
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 46% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 36% Deep learning architectures and training · 18% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › time series analysis
change point detection |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Detection and Localization of Changes in Conditional Distributions · NeurIPS 2022 A nonparametric method for gradual change problems with statistical guarantees · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | VCNet and Functional Targeted Regularization For Learning Causal Effects of Continuous Treatments · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal effect estimation › treatment effect estimation
continuous treatment effect estimation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | VCNet and Functional Targeted Regularization For Learning Causal Effects of Continuous Treatments · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
targeted regularization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | VCNet and Functional Targeted Regularization For Learning Causal Effects of Continuous Treatments · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Good Subnetworks Provably Exist: Pruning via Greedy Forward Selection · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Good Subnetworks Provably Exist: Pruning via Greedy Forward Selection · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
subnetwork discovery |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Good Subnetworks Provably Exist: Pruning via Greedy Forward Selection · ICML 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large sample properties · 0.6conditional expectation analysis · 0.6statistical guarantees · 0.5nonparametric methods · 0.5functional targeted regularization · 0.5VCNet · 0.5greedy selection · 0.4gradient descent · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Detection and Localization of Changes in Conditional DistributionsabstractWe study the change point problem that considers alterations in the conditional distribution of an inferential target on a set of covariates. This paired data scenario is in contrast to the standard setting where a sequentially observed variable is analyzed for potential changes in the marginal distribution. We propose new methodology for solving this problem, by starting from a simpler task that analyzes changes in conditional expectation, and generalizing the tools developed for that task to conditional distributions. Large sample properties of the proposed statistics are derived. In empirical studies, we illustrate the performance of the proposed method against baselines adapted from existing tools. Two real data applications are presented to demonstrate its potential. Lizhen Nie, Dan Nicolae |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | VCNet and Functional Targeted Regularization For Learning Causal Effects of Continuous Treatments
Lizhen Nie, Mao Ye 0006, Qiang Liu 0001, Dan Nicolae |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2021 | A nonparametric method for gradual change problems with statistical guaranteesabstractWe consider the detection and localization of gradual changes in the distribution of a sequence of time-ordered observations. Existing literature focuses mostly on the simpler abrupt setting which assumes a discontinuity jump in distribution, and is unrealistic for some applied settings. We propose a general method for detecting and localizing gradual changes that does not require any specific data generating model, any particular data type, or any prior knowledge about which features of the distribution are subject to change. Despite relaxed assumptions, the proposed method possesses proven theoretical guarantees for both detection and localization. Lizhen Nie, Dan Nicolae |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Good Subnetworks Provably Exist: Pruning via Greedy Forward SelectionabstractRecent empirical works show that large deep neural networks are often highly redundant and one can find much smaller subnetworks without a significant drop of accuracy. However, most existing methods of network pruning are empirical and heuristic, leaving it open whether good subnetworks provably exist, how to find them efficiently, and if network pruning can be provably better than direct training using gradient descent. We answer these problems positively by proposing a simple greedy selection approach for finding good subnetworks, which starts from an empty network and greedily adds important neurons from the large network. This differs from the existing methods based on backward elimination, which remove redundant neurons from the large network. Theoretically, applying the greedy selection strategy on sufficiently large {pre-trained} networks guarantees to find small subnetworks with lower loss than networks directly trained with gradient descent. Our results also apply to pruning randomly weighted networks. Practically, we improve prior arts of network pruning on learning compact neural architectures on ImageNet, including ResNet, MobilenetV2/V3, and ProxylessNet. Our theory and empirical results on MobileNet suggest that we should fine-tune the pruned subnetworks to leverage the information from the large model, instead of re-training from new random initialization as suggested in \citet{liu2018rethinking}. Mao Ye 0006, Chengyue Gong, Lizhen Nie, Denny Zhou, Adam R. Klivans, Qiang Liu 0001 |
ICML | 3 |