Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel Wiebking

dblp:217/2235 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 8 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
8 papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 60% Computational complexity · 20% Algorithms and data structures · 15%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph isomorphism
2.862023
Isomorphism Testing for Graphs Excluding Small Minors · SIAM J. Comput. 2023
Deep Weisfeiler Leman · SODA 2021
An Improved Isomorphism Test for Bounded-tree-width Graphs · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2020
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph isomorphism
canonical labeling
0.822020
An Improved Isomorphism Test for Bounded-tree-width Graphs · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2020
A unifying method for the design of algorithms canonizing combinatorial objects · STOC 2019
Computational complexity › descriptive complexity
choiceless polynomial time
0.512021
Deep Weisfeiler Leman · SODA 2021
Computational complexity
circuit complexity
0.512021
Deep Weisfeiler Leman · SODA 2021
Computational complexity
descriptive complexity
0.512021
Deep Weisfeiler Leman · SODA 2021
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph isomorphism
weisfeiler-leman algorithm
0.512021
Deep Weisfeiler Leman · SODA 2021
Algorithms and data structures › symbolic computation › computational algebra
computational group theory
0.412020
Normalizers and permutational isomorphisms in simply-exponential time · SODA 2020
Algorithms and data structures
exact algorithms
0.412020
Normalizers and permutational isomorphisms in simply-exponential time · SODA 2020
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph minors
excluded minor
0.412020
Isomorphism Testing for Graphs Excluding Small Minors · FOCS 2020
Algorithms and data structures › symbolic computation
permutation group algorithms
0.412020
Normalizers and permutational isomorphisms in simply-exponential time · SODA 2020
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory › graph parameters › graph width parameters › treewidth
bounded treewidth
0.312018
An Improved Isomorphism Test for Bounded-Tree-Width Graphs · ICALP 2018
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph minors
0.212023
Isomorphism Testing for Graphs Excluding Small Minors · SIAM J. Comput. 2023
Computational complexity › parameterized complexity
fixed-parameter tractability
0.112020
An Improved Isomorphism Test for Bounded-tree-width Graphs · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2020
Computational complexity
parameterized complexity
0.112020
An Improved Isomorphism Test for Bounded-tree-width Graphs · ACM Trans. Algorithms 2020
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory › graph parameters › graph width parameters
treewidth
0.112020
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time Parameterized by Treewidth · ICALP 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

group theory · 0.9group-theoretic graph isomorphism machinery · 0.7graph isomorphism testing · 0.5canonisation · 0.5graph minor theory · 0.4graph decomposition · 0.4canonical form · 0.4babai's algorithm · 0.4treewidth · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Isomorphism Testing for Graphs Excluding Small Minors
abstract
Abstract. We prove that there is a graph isomorphism test running in time [Formula: see text] on [Formula: see text]-vertex graphs excluding some [Formula: see text]-vertex graph as a minor. Previously known bounds were [Formula: see text] [I. N. Ponomarenko, J. Soviet Math., 55 (1991), pp. 1621–1643] and [Formula: see text] [L. Babai, Proceedings of the 48 th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2016, pp. 684–697]. For the algorithm we combine recent advances in the group-theoretic graph isomorphism machinery with new graph-theoretic arguments.
Martin Grohe, Daniel Neuen, Daniel Wiebking
SIAM J. Comput.3
2021 Deep Weisfeiler Leman
abstract
We introduce the framework of Deep Weisfeiler Leman algorithms (DeepWL), which allows the design of purely combinatorial graph isomorphism tests that are more powerful than the well-known Weisfeiler-Leman algorithm. We prove that, as an abstract computational model, polynomial-time DeepWL-algorithms have exactly the same expressiveness as the logic Choiceless Polynomial Time (with counting) introduced by Blass, Gurevich, and Shelah (Ann. Pure Appl. Logic., 1999). It is a well-known open question whether the existence of a polynomial-time graph isomorphism test implies the existence of a polynomial-time canonisation algorithm. Our main technical result states that for each class of graphs (satisfying some mild closure condition), if there is a polynomial-time DeepWL isomorphism test, then there is a polynomial-time canonisation algorithm for this class. This implies that there is also a logic capturing polynomial time on this class.
Martin Grohe, Pascal Schweitzer, Daniel Wiebking
SODA3
2020 Isomorphism Testing for Graphs Excluding Small Minors
abstract
We prove that there is a graph isomorphism test running in time npolylog(h)on n-vertex graphs excluding some h-vertex graph as a minor. Previously known bounds were npoly(h)(Ponomarenko, 1988) and npolylog(n)(Babai, STOC 2016). For the algorithm we combine recent advances in the group-theoretic graph isomorphism machinery with new graph-theoretic arguments.
Martin Grohe, Daniel Wiebking, Daniel Neuen
FOCS2
2020 Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time Parameterized by Treewidth
abstract
We extend Babai's quasipolynomial-time graph isomorphism test (STOC 2016) and develop a quasipolynomial-time algorithm for the multiple-coset isomorphism problem. The algorithm for the multiple-coset isomorphism problem allows to exploit graph decompositions of the given input graphs within Babai's group-theoretic framework. We use it to develop a graph isomorphism test that runs in time $n^{\operatorname{polylog}(k)}$ where $n$ is the number of vertices and $k$ is the minimum treewidth of the given graphs and $\operatorname{polylog}(k)$ is some polynomial in $\operatorname{log}(k)$. Our result generalizes Babai's quasipolynomial-time graph isomorphism test.
Daniel Wiebking
ICALP1
2020 Normalizers and permutational isomorphisms in simply-exponential time
abstract
We show that normalizers and permutational isomorphisms of permutation groups given by generating sets can be computed in time simply exponential in the degree of the groups. The result is obtained by exploiting canonical forms for permutation groups (up to permutational isomorphism).
Daniel Wiebking
SODA1
2020 An Improved Isomorphism Test for Bounded-tree-width Graphs
abstract
We give a new FPT algorithm testing isomorphism of n -vertex graphs of tree-width k in time 2 kpolylog(k) n 3 , improving the FPT algorithm due to Lokshtanov, Pilipczuk, Pilipczuk, and Saurabh (FOCS 2014), which runs in time 2 O(k5 log k) n 5 . Based on an improved version of the isomorphism-invariant graph decomposition technique introduced by Lokshtanov et al., we prove restrictions on the structure of the automorphism groups of graphs of tree-width k . Our algorithm then makes heavy use of the group theoretic techniques introduced by Luks (JCSS 1982) in his isomorphism test for bounded degree graphs and Babai (STOC 2016) in his quasipolynomial isomorphism test. In fact, we even use Babai’s algorithm as a black box in one place. We also give a second algorithm that, at the price of a slightly worse running time 2 O(k2 log k) n 3 , avoids the use of Babai’s algorithm and, more importantly, has the additional benefit that it can also be used as a canonization algorithm.
Martin Grohe, Daniel Neuen, Pascal Schweitzer, Daniel Wiebking
ACM Trans. Algorithms4
2019 A unifying method for the design of algorithms canonizing combinatorial objects
abstract
We devise a unified framework for the design of canonization algorithms. Using hereditarily finite sets, we define a general notion of combinatorial objects that includes graphs, hypergraphs, relational structures, codes, permutation groups, tree decompositions, and so on.
Pascal Schweitzer, Daniel Wiebking
STOC2
2018 An Improved Isomorphism Test for Bounded-Tree-Width Graphs
Martin Grohe, Daniel Neuen, Pascal Schweitzer, Daniel Wiebking
ICALP4