Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aurelia Guy

dblp:217/2260 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 26% Efficient and distributed learning · 17% Reinforcement learning · 15%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scaling laws
1.122022
An empirical analysis of compute-optimal large language model training · NeurIPS 2022
Unified Scaling Laws for Routed Language Models · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › efficient training
compute-optimal training
0.612022
An empirical analysis of compute-optimal large language model training · NeurIPS 2022
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
knowledge-intensive tasks
0.612022
Improving Language Models by Retrieving from Trillions of Tokens · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
mixture of experts
0.612022
Unified Scaling Laws for Routed Language Models · ICML 2022
Robotics › Robot manipulation
mobile manipulation
0.612022
Intra-agent speech permits zero-shot task acquisition · NeurIPS 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented language models
0.612022
Improving Language Models by Retrieving from Trillions of Tokens · ICML 2022
Information retrieval
document retrieval
0.612022
Improving Language Models by Retrieving from Trillions of Tokens · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
continuous control
0.312018
Simple random search of static linear policies is competitive for reinforcement learning · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy search
0.312018
Simple random search of static linear policies is competitive for reinforcement learning · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › black-box optimization
random search
0.312018
Simple random search of static linear policies is competitive for reinforcement learning · NeurIPS 2018
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › autonomous agents
embodied agent
0.212022
Intra-agent speech permits zero-shot task acquisition · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

differentiable encoder · 1.1chunked cross-attention · 1.1semi-supervised learning · 0.6scaling law estimation · 0.6power-law scaling · 0.6intra-agent speech · 0.6effective parameter count · 0.6static linear policies · 0.3random search · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Improving Language Models by Retrieving from Trillions of Tokens
abstract
We enhance auto-regressive language models by conditioning on document chunks retrieved from a large corpus, based on local similarity with preceding tokens. With a 2 trillion token database, our Retrieval-Enhanced Transformer (RETRO) obtains comparable performance to GPT-3 and Jurassic-1 on the Pile, despite using 25{\texttimes} fewer parameters. After fine-tuning, RETRO performance translates to downstream knowledge-intensive tasks such as question answering. RETRO combines a frozen Bert retriever, a differentiable encoder and a chunked cross-attention mechanism to predict tokens based on an order of magnitude more data than what is typically consumed during training. We typically train RETRO from scratch, yet can also rapidly RETROfit pre-trained transformers with retrieval and still achieve good performance. Our work opens up new avenues for improving language models through explicit memory at unprecedented scale.
Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Jordan Hoffmann, Trevor Cai, Eliza Rutherford, Katie Millican, George van den Driessche 0002, Jean-Baptiste Lespiau, Bogdan Damoc, Aidan Clark, Diego de Las Casas, Aurelia Guy, Jacob Menick, Roman Ring, Tom Hennigan, Saffron Huang, Loren Maggiore, Albin Cassirer, Andrew Brock, Michela Paganini, Geoffrey Irving, Oriol Vinyals, Simon Osindero, Karen Simonyan, Jack W. Rae, Erich Elsen, Laurent Sifre
ICML12
2022 Unified Scaling Laws for Routed Language Models
abstract
The performance of a language model has been shown to be effectively modeled as a power-law in its parameter count. Here we study the scaling behaviors of Routing Networks: architectures that conditionally use only a subset of their parameters while processing an input. For these models, parameter count and computational requirement form two independent axes along which an increase leads to better performance. In this work we derive and justify scaling laws defined on these two variables which generalize those known for standard language models and describe the performance of a wide range of routing architectures trained via three different techniques. Afterwards we provide two applications of these laws: first deriving an Effective Parameter Count along which all models scale at the same rate, and then using the scaling coefficients to give a quantitative comparison of the three routing techniques considered. Our analysis derives from an extensive evaluation of Routing Networks across five orders of magnitude of size, including models with hundreds of experts and hundreds of billions of parameters.
Aidan Clark, Diego de Las Casas, Aurelia Guy, Arthur Mensch, Michela Paganini, Jordan Hoffmann, Bogdan Damoc, Blake A. Hechtman, Trevor Cai, Sebastian Borgeaud, George van den Driessche 0002, Eliza Rutherford, Tom Hennigan, Matthew J. Johnson 0002, Albin Cassirer, Elena Buchatskaya, David Budden, Laurent Sifre, Simon Osindero, Oriol Vinyals, Marc'Aurelio Ranzato, Jack W. Rae, Erich Elsen, Koray Kavukcuoglu, Karen Simonyan
ICML3
2022 An empirical analysis of compute-optimal large language model training
abstract
We investigate the optimal model size and number of tokens for training a transformer language model under a given compute budget. We find that current large language models are significantly undertrained, a consequence of the recent focus on scaling language models whilst keeping the amount of training data constant. By training over 400 language models ranging from 70 million to over 16 billion parameters on 5 to 500 billion tokens, we find that for compute-optimal training, the model size and the number of training tokens should be scaled equally: for every doubling of model size the number of training tokens should also be doubled. We test this hypothesis by training a predicted compute-optimal model, Chinchilla, that uses the same compute budget as Gopher but with 70B parameters and 4$\times$ more data. Chinchilla uniformly and significantly outperformsGopher (280B), GPT-3 (175B), Jurassic-1 (178B), and Megatron-Turing NLG (530B) on a large range of downstream evaluation tasks. This also means that Chinchilla uses substantially less compute for fine-tuning and inference, greatly facilitating downstream usage. As a highlight, Chinchilla reaches a state-of-the-art average accuracy of 67.5% on the MMLU benchmark, a 7% improvement over Gopher.
Jordan Hoffmann, Sebastian Borgeaud, Arthur Mensch, Elena Buchatskaya, Trevor Cai, Eliza Rutherford, Diego de Las Casas, Lisa Anne Hendricks, Johannes Welbl, Aidan Clark, Tom Hennigan, Eric Noland, Katherine Millican, George van den Driessche 0002, Bogdan Damoc, Aurelia Guy, Simon Osindero, Karen Simonyan, Erich Elsen, Oriol Vinyals, Jack W. Rae, Laurent Sifre
NeurIPS16
2022 Intra-agent speech permits zero-shot task acquisition
abstract
Human language learners are exposed to a trickle of informative, context-sensitive language, but a flood of raw sensory data. Through both social language use and internal processes of rehearsal and practice, language learners are able to build high-level, semantic representations that explain their perceptions. Here, we take inspiration from such processes of "inner speech" in humans (Vygotsky, 1934) to better understand the role of intra-agent speech in embodied behavior. First, we formally pose intra-agent speech as a semi-supervised problem and develop two algorithms that enable visually grounded captioning with little labeled language data. We then experimentally compute scaling curves over different amounts of labeled data and compare the data efficiency against a supervised learning baseline. Finally, we incorporate intra-agent speech into an embodied, mobile manipulator agent operating in a 3D virtual world, and show that with as few as 150 additional image captions, intra-agent speech endows the agent with the ability to manipulate and answer questions about a new object without any related task-directed experience (zero-shot). Taken together, our experiments suggest that modelling intra-agent speech is effective in enabling embodied agents to learn new tasks efficiently and without direct interaction experience.
Federico Carnevale, Petko Georgiev, Adam Santoro, Aurelia Guy, Alistair Muldal, Chia-Chun Hung, Josh Abramson, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Greg Wayne
NeurIPS5
2018 Simple random search of static linear policies is competitive for reinforcement learning
abstract
Model-free reinforcement learning aims to offer off-the-shelf solutions for controlling dynamical systems without requiring models of the system dynamics. We introduce a model-free random search algorithm for training static, linear policies for continuous control problems. Common evaluation methodology shows that our method matches state-of-the-art sample efficiency on the benchmark MuJoCo locomotion tasks. Nonetheless, more rigorous evaluation reveals that the assessment of performance on these benchmarks is optimistic. We evaluate the performance of our method over hundreds of random seeds and many different hyperparameter configurations for each benchmark task. This extensive evaluation is possible because of the small computational footprint of our method. Our simulations highlight a high variability in performance in these benchmark tasks, indicating that commonly used estimations of sample efficiency do not adequately evaluate the performance of RL algorithms. Our results stress the need for new baselines, benchmarks and evaluation methodology for RL algorithms.
Horia Mania, Aurelia Guy, Benjamin Recht
NeurIPS2