Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sebastian Schulze

dblp:217/2425 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Reinforcement learning · 70% Optimization for machine learning · 26% Deep learning architectures and training · 4%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
meta-reinforcement learning
0.922021
VariBAD: Variational Bayes-Adaptive Deep RL via Meta-Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
VariBAD: A Very Good Method for Bayes-Adaptive Deep RL via Meta-Learning · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
exploration-exploitation tradeoff
0.512021
VariBAD: Variational Bayes-Adaptive Deep RL via Meta-Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › meta-reinforcement learning
bayes-adaptive reinforcement learning
0.412020
VariBAD: A Very Good Method for Bayes-Adaptive Deep RL via Meta-Learning · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
0.412020
Bayesian Optimization for Iterative Learning · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization
0.412020
Bayesian Optimization for Iterative Learning · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network
0.112020
Bayesian Optimization for Iterative Learning · NeurIPS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variational inference · 0.9variational autoencoder · 0.5approximate inference · 0.5meta-learning · 0.4iterative learning progress modeling · 0.4bayesian optimization · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Marginalising over Stationary Kernels with Bayesian Quadrature
abstract
Marginalising over families of Gaussian Process kernels produces flexible model classes with well-calibrated uncertainty estimates. Existing approaches require likelihood evaluations of many kernels, rendering them prohibitively expensive for larger datasets. We propose a Bayesian Quadrature scheme to make this marginalisation more efficient and thereby more practical. Through use of maximum mean discrepancies between distributions, we define a kernel over kernels that captures invariances between Spectral Mixture (SM) Kernels. Kernel samples are selected by generalising an information-theoretic acquisition function for warped Bayesian Quadrature. We show that our framework achieves more accurate predictions with better calibrated uncertainty than state-of-the-art baselines, especially when given limited (wall-clock) time budgets.
Saad Hamid, Sebastian Schulze, Michael A. Osborne, Stephen J. Roberts
AISTATS2
2021 VariBAD: Variational Bayes-Adaptive Deep RL via Meta-Learning
abstract
Trading off exploration and exploitation in an unknown environment is key to maximising expected online return during learning. A Bayes-optimal policy, which does so optimally, conditions its actions not only on the environment state but also on the agent's uncertainty about the environment. Computing a Bayes-optimal policy is however intractable for all but the smallest tasks. In this paper, we introduce variational Bayes-Adaptive Deep RL (variBAD), a way to meta-learn approximately Bayes-optimal policies for complex tasks. VariBAD simultaneously meta-learns a variational auto-encoder to perform approximate inference, and a policy that incorporates task uncertainty directly during action selection by conditioning on both the environment state and the approximate belief. In two toy domains, we illustrate how variBAD performs structured online exploration as a function of task uncertainty. We further evaluate variBAD on MuJoCo tasks widely used in meta-RL and show that it achieves higher online return than existing methods. On the recently proposed Meta-World ML1 benchmark, variBAD achieves state of the art results by a large margin, fully solving two out of the three ML1 tasks for the first time.
Luisa M. Zintgraf, Sebastian Schulze, Cong Lu, Leo Feng, Maximilian Igl, Kyriacos Shiarlis, Yarin Gal, Katja Hofmann, Shimon Whiteson
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2020 VariBAD: A Very Good Method for Bayes-Adaptive Deep RL via Meta-Learning
Luisa M. Zintgraf, Kyriacos Shiarlis, Maximilian Igl, Sebastian Schulze, Yarin Gal, Katja Hofmann, Shimon Whiteson
ICLR4
2020 Bayesian Optimization for Iterative Learning
abstract
The performance of deep (reinforcement) learning systems crucially depends on the choice of hyperparameters. Their tuning is notoriously expensive, typically requiring an iterative training process to run for numerous steps to convergence. Traditional tuning algorithms only consider the final performance of hyperparameters acquired after many expensive iterations and ignore intermediate information from earlier training steps. In this paper, we present a Bayesian optimization(BO) approach which exploits the iterative structure of learning algorithms for efficient hyperparameter tuning. We propose to learn an evaluation function compressing learning progress at any stage of the training process into a single numeric score according to both training success and stability. Our BO framework is then trade-off the benefit of assessing a hyperparameter setting over additional training steps against their computation cost. We further increase model efficiency by selectively including scores from different training steps for any evaluated hyperparameter set. We demonstrate the efficiency of our algorithm by tuning hyperparameters for the training of deep reinforcement learning agents and convolutional neural networks. Our algorithm outperforms all existing baselines in identifying optimal hyperparameters in minimal time.
Sebastian Schulze, Michael A. Osborne
NeurIPS2